Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vellozo, Fernanda Freitas
Publication Date: 2019
Format: Doctoral thesis
Language: por
Source: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000qqpd
Download full: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20952
Summary: Objective: Check the difference between tonal averages in two groups of subjects with descending audiometric configuration and analyze which one best represents the degree of hearing impairment. Furthermore, to study the Speech Recognition Percentage Index (SRPI) and its relation with the time of auditory sensory deprivation of these subjects. Method: Participated in the study 28 subjects, with descending audiometric configuration, divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) - average frequencies of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz (TTM) equal to or less than 25 dB and Group 2 (G2) - hearing thresholds above 25 dB in TTM. The average of frequencies from: 250 Hz to 8000 Hz (8M) was compared with TTM; and with frequencies from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz (QTTM). The different tonal averages were correlated with the hearing disadvantage obtained through the HHIA/HHIE-S questionnaires. Moreover, the influence of the time of auditory sensory deprivation on the SRPI between the groups was analyzed. Results: For G1, one 8M showed a result superior to others, statistically significant, while for G2, this result was observed only in TTM. When correlating the different tonal averages with the degree of hearing impairment, the correlation strength was more expressive for 8M. The subjects in G2 had the longest time of auditory sensory deprivation and the worst scores in the SRPI. It was also observed that the longer the time of auditory sensory deprivation the worse the scores on the SRPI, being more expressive for the G2. Conclusion: For the hearing losses of descending audiometric configuration, the M8 better represented the hearing disadvantage presented by the subjects of G1. The time of auditory sensory deprivation influenced the performance of speech perception, especially when TTM was altered.
id UFSM_5b9d49e70b848fecc1b2b64024aa7327
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/20952
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorialDescending audiometric configuration: analysis of different tonal averages, hearing disadvantage, speech recognition and effect of sensory deprivationAudiçãoPerda auditivaAudiometria da falaQuestionáriosPrivação sensorialHearingHearing lossSpeech audiometryQuestionnairesSensory deprivationCNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIAObjective: Check the difference between tonal averages in two groups of subjects with descending audiometric configuration and analyze which one best represents the degree of hearing impairment. Furthermore, to study the Speech Recognition Percentage Index (SRPI) and its relation with the time of auditory sensory deprivation of these subjects. Method: Participated in the study 28 subjects, with descending audiometric configuration, divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) - average frequencies of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz (TTM) equal to or less than 25 dB and Group 2 (G2) - hearing thresholds above 25 dB in TTM. The average of frequencies from: 250 Hz to 8000 Hz (8M) was compared with TTM; and with frequencies from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz (QTTM). The different tonal averages were correlated with the hearing disadvantage obtained through the HHIA/HHIE-S questionnaires. Moreover, the influence of the time of auditory sensory deprivation on the SRPI between the groups was analyzed. Results: For G1, one 8M showed a result superior to others, statistically significant, while for G2, this result was observed only in TTM. When correlating the different tonal averages with the degree of hearing impairment, the correlation strength was more expressive for 8M. The subjects in G2 had the longest time of auditory sensory deprivation and the worst scores in the SRPI. It was also observed that the longer the time of auditory sensory deprivation the worse the scores on the SRPI, being more expressive for the G2. Conclusion: For the hearing losses of descending audiometric configuration, the M8 better represented the hearing disadvantage presented by the subjects of G1. The time of auditory sensory deprivation influenced the performance of speech perception, especially when TTM was altered.Objetivo: Verificar a diferença entre médias tonais em dois grupos de sujeitos com configuração audiométrica descendente, e analisar qual delas representa melhor o grau de desvantagem auditiva. Ainda, estudar o Índice Percentual de Reconhecimento de Fala (IPRF) e sua relação com o tempo de privação sensorial auditiva desses sujeitos. Método: Participaram 28 sujeitos, com configuração audiométrica descendente, divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1 (G1) – média das frequências de 500 Hz, 1000 Hz e 2000 Hz (MTT) igual ou inferior a 25 dB e Grupo 2 (G2) - limiares auditivos superiores a 25 dB na MTT. Comparou-se a média das frequências de: 250 Hz a 8000 Hz (M8), com a MTT; e com as frequências de 500 Hz a 4000 Hz (MQT). Correlacionou-se as diferentes médias tonais com a desvantagem auditiva obtida por meio dos questionários HHIA/HHIE-S. Ainda, analisou-se a influência do tempo de privação sensorial auditiva no IPRF entre os grupos. Resultados: para o G1, a M8 apresentou resultado superior as demais, estatisticamente significante, já para o G2, esse resultado foi observado apenas comparado a MTT. Ao correlacionar as diferentes médias tonais com o grau de desvantagem auditiva, a força de correlação mostrou-se mais expressiva para a M8. Os sujeitos do G2 apresentaram o maior tempo de privação sensorial auditiva e os piores escores no IPRF. Observou-se, também, que quanto maior o tempo de privação sensorial auditiva piores foram os escores no IPRF, sendo mais expressiva para o G2. Conclusão: para as perdas auditivas de configuração audiométrica descendente a M8 representou melhor a desvantagem auditiva apresentada pelos sujeitos do G1. O tempo de privação sensorial auditiva influenciou no desempenho da percepção de fala, principalmente quando a MTT encontrou-se alterada.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilFonoaudiologiaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação HumanaCentro de Ciências da SaúdeGarcia, Michele Vargashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8921088842000990Lessa, Alexandre HundertmarkXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVaucher, Ana Valéria de AlmeidaXXXXXXXXXXXXXXSalgado, Márcia MachadoXXXXXXXXXXXXCosta, Maristela JulioXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVellozo, Fernanda Freitas2021-05-21T12:00:36Z2021-05-21T12:00:36Z2019-12-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20952ark:/26339/001300000qqpdporAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-05-22T06:02:43Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/20952Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2024-07-29T10:50:44.843092Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
Descending audiometric configuration: analysis of different tonal averages, hearing disadvantage, speech recognition and effect of sensory deprivation
title Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
spellingShingle Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
Vellozo, Fernanda Freitas
Audição
Perda auditiva
Audiometria da fala
Questionários
Privação sensorial
Hearing
Hearing loss
Speech audiometry
Questionnaires
Sensory deprivation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
title_short Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
title_full Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
title_fullStr Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
title_full_unstemmed Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
title_sort Configuração audiométrica descendente: análise de diferentes médias tonais, desvantagem auditiva, reconhecimento de fala e efeito da privação sensorial
author Vellozo, Fernanda Freitas
author_facet Vellozo, Fernanda Freitas
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Garcia, Michele Vargas
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8921088842000990
Lessa, Alexandre Hundertmark
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Vaucher, Ana Valéria de Almeida
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Salgado, Márcia Machado
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Costa, Maristela Julio
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vellozo, Fernanda Freitas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Audição
Perda auditiva
Audiometria da fala
Questionários
Privação sensorial
Hearing
Hearing loss
Speech audiometry
Questionnaires
Sensory deprivation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
topic Audição
Perda auditiva
Audiometria da fala
Questionários
Privação sensorial
Hearing
Hearing loss
Speech audiometry
Questionnaires
Sensory deprivation
CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::FONOAUDIOLOGIA
description Objective: Check the difference between tonal averages in two groups of subjects with descending audiometric configuration and analyze which one best represents the degree of hearing impairment. Furthermore, to study the Speech Recognition Percentage Index (SRPI) and its relation with the time of auditory sensory deprivation of these subjects. Method: Participated in the study 28 subjects, with descending audiometric configuration, divided into two groups: Group 1 (G1) - average frequencies of 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz (TTM) equal to or less than 25 dB and Group 2 (G2) - hearing thresholds above 25 dB in TTM. The average of frequencies from: 250 Hz to 8000 Hz (8M) was compared with TTM; and with frequencies from 500 Hz to 4000 Hz (QTTM). The different tonal averages were correlated with the hearing disadvantage obtained through the HHIA/HHIE-S questionnaires. Moreover, the influence of the time of auditory sensory deprivation on the SRPI between the groups was analyzed. Results: For G1, one 8M showed a result superior to others, statistically significant, while for G2, this result was observed only in TTM. When correlating the different tonal averages with the degree of hearing impairment, the correlation strength was more expressive for 8M. The subjects in G2 had the longest time of auditory sensory deprivation and the worst scores in the SRPI. It was also observed that the longer the time of auditory sensory deprivation the worse the scores on the SRPI, being more expressive for the G2. Conclusion: For the hearing losses of descending audiometric configuration, the M8 better represented the hearing disadvantage presented by the subjects of G1. The time of auditory sensory deprivation influenced the performance of speech perception, especially when TTM was altered.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-09
2021-05-21T12:00:36Z
2021-05-21T12:00:36Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20952
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000qqpd
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/20952
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000qqpd
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Fonoaudiologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana
Centro de Ciências da Saúde
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Fonoaudiologia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana
Centro de Ciências da Saúde
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com
_version_ 1814439829819097088