A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ali,Abid
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Parizi,Luís Fernando, Ferreira,Beatriz Rossetti, Vaz Junior,Itabajara da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701240
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) species are monoxenous ticks with seasonal distribution in tropical and subtropical regions. For many years, Rhipicephalus micropluswas considered as a single species; however, further analysis split these ticks into two distinct species. Because R. microplusand R. australisshare similar attributes, it is hard to discriminate these two species and explain the changes in the classification of these parasites over the past decades. The reappearance of R. australisis an outcome of new research, which has afforded to better characterize these probably cryptic species. Evidence based on morphological features, the lack of conspecificity, microsatellite markers, mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal DNA, and mitochondrial genome supports the re-classification of R. microplusas different species. Therefore, populations of R. microplusfrom Australia, Cambodia, Philippines, Indonesia, New Caledonia, Borneo, New Guinea, Tahiti and parts of Southeast Asia were recently reinstated as R. australis. Moreover, a better knowledge on the speciation between these two species could pave the way to important advances in tick control strategies.
id UFSM-2_31825c9f2939dc0f371f1017d3789631
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782016000701240
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australisRhipicephalusBoophilusmicroplusaustralistaxonomy.ABSTRACT: Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) species are monoxenous ticks with seasonal distribution in tropical and subtropical regions. For many years, Rhipicephalus micropluswas considered as a single species; however, further analysis split these ticks into two distinct species. Because R. microplusand R. australisshare similar attributes, it is hard to discriminate these two species and explain the changes in the classification of these parasites over the past decades. The reappearance of R. australisis an outcome of new research, which has afforded to better characterize these probably cryptic species. Evidence based on morphological features, the lack of conspecificity, microsatellite markers, mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal DNA, and mitochondrial genome supports the re-classification of R. microplusas different species. Therefore, populations of R. microplusfrom Australia, Cambodia, Philippines, Indonesia, New Caledonia, Borneo, New Guinea, Tahiti and parts of Southeast Asia were recently reinstated as R. australis. Moreover, a better knowledge on the speciation between these two species could pave the way to important advances in tick control strategies.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701240Ciência Rural v.46 n.7 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20151416info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAli,AbidParizi,Luís FernandoFerreira,Beatriz RossettiVaz Junior,Itabajara da Silvaeng2016-05-03T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
title A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
spellingShingle A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
Ali,Abid
Rhipicephalus
Boophilus
microplus
australis
taxonomy.
title_short A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
title_full A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
title_fullStr A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
title_full_unstemmed A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
title_sort A revision of two distinct species of Rhipicephalus: R. microplus and R. australis
author Ali,Abid
author_facet Ali,Abid
Parizi,Luís Fernando
Ferreira,Beatriz Rossetti
Vaz Junior,Itabajara da Silva
author_role author
author2 Parizi,Luís Fernando
Ferreira,Beatriz Rossetti
Vaz Junior,Itabajara da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ali,Abid
Parizi,Luís Fernando
Ferreira,Beatriz Rossetti
Vaz Junior,Itabajara da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rhipicephalus
Boophilus
microplus
australis
taxonomy.
topic Rhipicephalus
Boophilus
microplus
australis
taxonomy.
description ABSTRACT: Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) species are monoxenous ticks with seasonal distribution in tropical and subtropical regions. For many years, Rhipicephalus micropluswas considered as a single species; however, further analysis split these ticks into two distinct species. Because R. microplusand R. australisshare similar attributes, it is hard to discriminate these two species and explain the changes in the classification of these parasites over the past decades. The reappearance of R. australisis an outcome of new research, which has afforded to better characterize these probably cryptic species. Evidence based on morphological features, the lack of conspecificity, microsatellite markers, mitochondrial 12S and 16S ribosomal DNA, and mitochondrial genome supports the re-classification of R. microplusas different species. Therefore, populations of R. microplusfrom Australia, Cambodia, Philippines, Indonesia, New Caledonia, Borneo, New Guinea, Tahiti and parts of Southeast Asia were recently reinstated as R. australis. Moreover, a better knowledge on the speciation between these two species could pave the way to important advances in tick control strategies.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701240
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701240
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.46 n.7 2016
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140550437568512