Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ciência Rural |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000300930 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT: The paper examined dominant discourses in the debate about live animal transport and trade before reviewing trade figures from the UN Comtrade database. Between 1998 and 2015, the trade in cattle increased slightly, the trade in pigs increased by 76%, while the trade in poultry increased more than doubled. It is shown that an increased division of work is the driving force behind animal trade and that not even animal advocacy groups are effective in reducing the amount of trade. Largely independent of the ethical framework applied, in an environment that pays increasingly tribute to animal welfare, this is problematic. The paper concluded that animal trade results in externalities that should be internalized by governments. |
id |
UFSM-2_a5693ad142935ac72dcdcd7738ca2577 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782019000300930 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal tradelive animal tradetransport stressanimal welfareABSTRACT: The paper examined dominant discourses in the debate about live animal transport and trade before reviewing trade figures from the UN Comtrade database. Between 1998 and 2015, the trade in cattle increased slightly, the trade in pigs increased by 76%, while the trade in poultry increased more than doubled. It is shown that an increased division of work is the driving force behind animal trade and that not even animal advocacy groups are effective in reducing the amount of trade. Largely independent of the ethical framework applied, in an environment that pays increasingly tribute to animal welfare, this is problematic. The paper concluded that animal trade results in externalities that should be internalized by governments.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000300930Ciência Rural v.49 n.3 2019reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20180567info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMann,StefanBeciu,SilviuArghiroiu,Georgiana Armenitaeng2019-06-04T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
title |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
spellingShingle |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade Mann,Stefan live animal trade transport stress animal welfare |
title_short |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
title_full |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
title_fullStr |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
title_full_unstemmed |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
title_sort |
Farm animals against open borders: uncovering discrepancies between narratives and evidence regarding actors and motives in the animal trade |
author |
Mann,Stefan |
author_facet |
Mann,Stefan Beciu,Silviu Arghiroiu,Georgiana Armenita |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Beciu,Silviu Arghiroiu,Georgiana Armenita |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mann,Stefan Beciu,Silviu Arghiroiu,Georgiana Armenita |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
live animal trade transport stress animal welfare |
topic |
live animal trade transport stress animal welfare |
description |
ABSTRACT: The paper examined dominant discourses in the debate about live animal transport and trade before reviewing trade figures from the UN Comtrade database. Between 1998 and 2015, the trade in cattle increased slightly, the trade in pigs increased by 76%, while the trade in poultry increased more than doubled. It is shown that an increased division of work is the driving force behind animal trade and that not even animal advocacy groups are effective in reducing the amount of trade. Largely independent of the ethical framework applied, in an environment that pays increasingly tribute to animal welfare, this is problematic. The paper concluded that animal trade results in externalities that should be internalized by governments. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000300930 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782019000300930 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20180567 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.49 n.3 2019 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140553495216128 |