Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cazedey,Henrique Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Torres Filho,Robledo de Almeida, Fontes,Paulo Rogério, Ramos,Alcinéia de Lemos Souza, Ramos,Eduardo Mendes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência Rural
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241
Resumo: ABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.
id UFSM-2_f2bafcb707a4abf7cf4e783cee2e2eae
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782016001202241
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of porkPSEDFD meatcolorexudationpHABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241Ciência Rural v.46 n.12 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20160013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCazedey,Henrique PereiraTorres Filho,Robledo de AlmeidaFontes,Paulo RogérioRamos,Alcinéia de Lemos SouzaRamos,Eduardo Mendeseng2016-10-20T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
spellingShingle Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
Cazedey,Henrique Pereira
PSE
DFD meat
color
exudation
pH
title_short Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_fullStr Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
title_sort Comparison of different criteria used to categorize technological quality of pork
author Cazedey,Henrique Pereira
author_facet Cazedey,Henrique Pereira
Torres Filho,Robledo de Almeida
Fontes,Paulo Rogério
Ramos,Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos,Eduardo Mendes
author_role author
author2 Torres Filho,Robledo de Almeida
Fontes,Paulo Rogério
Ramos,Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos,Eduardo Mendes
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cazedey,Henrique Pereira
Torres Filho,Robledo de Almeida
Fontes,Paulo Rogério
Ramos,Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos,Eduardo Mendes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv PSE
DFD meat
color
exudation
pH
topic PSE
DFD meat
color
exudation
pH
description ABSTRACT: Pork may be classified into quality categories according to its color, texture and exudation, though no international consensus criterion has been reached yet. Thus, the aim of the present paper was to examine the relation between important meat quality traits, evaluating pork quality classification of a same data by different criteria proposed in the literature. In 60 pork loins (Longissimus thoracis muscle), initial pH (pH45min) and R-value were evaluated after 45min post mortem between the 9th and 10th ribs, and ultimate pH (pH24h), objective color and water-holding capacity were evaluated 24h post mortem in two 2.54cm thick steaks cut between the 9th and 11th ribs to be classified into PSE (pale, soft and exudative), RSE (reddish-pink, soft and exudative), RFN (reddish-pink, firm and non-exudative) or DFD (dark, firm and dry) quality. Frequency distributions of quality categories differed (P<0.001) among criteria, which resulted in large variations: 3 to 68% PSE; 0 to 73% RSE; 5 to 68% RFN; 0 to 22% DFD; and 0 to 33% unclassified samples. A same sample may be classified into different quality categories according to the criterion utilized, which results in large variations in frequency distributions and also in quality attributes. Therefore, the classification of pork quality depends on the adopted criterion, which indicated the need for international standardization, so that pork quality can be determined efficiently and effectively.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016001202241
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20160013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.46 n.12 2016
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140550823444480