ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Conceição, Paulo Cesar, Böck, Valídio, Port, Odair, Silva, Danni Maisa da, Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ciência Florestal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922
Resumo: Study of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used.  However,  to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index.  As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as  efficient as  the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed.
id UFSM-6_be6ec195195f42bd5dce33c4bd9dc712
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1922
network_acronym_str UFSM-6
network_name_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNAMétodo alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo.biological diversitymesofaunapitfall tramp.diversidade biológicamesofaunaarmadilhaStudy of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used.  However,  to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index.  As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as  efficient as  the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed.Os levantamentos realizados sobre populações da fauna edáfica podem não mostrar diferenças de abundância de organismos por esbarrarem na dificuldade de instalação das armadilhas de coleta, rotineiramente utilizadas. Contudo, para uma maior praticidade de implantação e de determinação do nível populacional de organismos edáficos, foi avaliada uma metodologia alternativa à armadilha de Tretzel (modificada), o método Provid, para a coleta da fauna edáfica, proposto pelos autores deste trabalho. Os dois métodos foram instalados em nove diferentes áreas, com três repetições por método. As áreas diferiram quanto à localização, tipo de solo e cobertura vegetal. Os parâmetros avaliados para a população da fauna edáfica foram riqueza: abundância e índice de diversidade de Simpson. Diferenças estatísticas significativas não foram encontradas para os dois métodos de coleta de organismos edáficos entre as nove áreas analisadas para os parâmetros avaliados. Portanto, pode-se concluir que a metodologia de coleta da fauna edáfica pelo método Provid pode ser utilizada de uma forma tão eficiente quanto à armadilha de Tretzel modificada. O método Provid é prático e fácil de usar.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2006-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/192210.5902/198050981922Ciência Florestal; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2006); 407-417Ciência Florestal; v. 16 n. 4 (2006); 407-4171980-50980103-9954reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMporhttps://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922/1164Antoniolli, Zaida InêsConceição, Paulo CesarBöck, ValídioPort, OdairSilva, Danni Maisa daSilva, Rodrigo Ferreira dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-05-15T11:51:16Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1922Revistahttp://www.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br1980-50980103-9954opendoar:2017-05-15T11:51:16Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
Método alternativo para estudar a fauna do solo.
title ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
spellingShingle ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
biological diversity
mesofauna
pitfall tramp.
diversidade biológica
mesofauna
armadilha
title_short ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
title_full ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
title_fullStr ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
title_full_unstemmed ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
title_sort ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO STUDY SOIL EDAPHIC FAUNA
author Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
author_facet Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
Conceição, Paulo Cesar
Böck, Valídio
Port, Odair
Silva, Danni Maisa da
Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da
author_role author
author2 Conceição, Paulo Cesar
Böck, Valídio
Port, Odair
Silva, Danni Maisa da
Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Antoniolli, Zaida Inês
Conceição, Paulo Cesar
Böck, Valídio
Port, Odair
Silva, Danni Maisa da
Silva, Rodrigo Ferreira da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv biological diversity
mesofauna
pitfall tramp.
diversidade biológica
mesofauna
armadilha
topic biological diversity
mesofauna
pitfall tramp.
diversidade biológica
mesofauna
armadilha
description Study of soil organisms population may not detect differences of organisms number due to the difficulty of pitfall installation methods routinely used.  However,  to a better practice and determination of population level of soil organisms, it was evaluated an alternative methodology to the pitfall Tretzel (modified). The method is called Provid, for the collection of the soil organisms, proposed by the authors of this work. The two methods were installed in nine different areas, with three replication for each method. The areas differed in terms of location, soil type and vegetable covering. The appraised parameters were richeness, abundance and Simpson´s index.  As results, it was not found significant statistical differences for the two methods of collection of organism´s edaphios among the nine analyzed areas, for the appraised parameters. Therefore, that the methodology of collection of the soil organisms for the Provid method can be used as  efficient as  the pitfall Tretzel modified method. The Provid method is practical and easy to be managed.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922
10.5902/198050981922
url https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922
identifier_str_mv 10.5902/198050981922
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/1922/1164
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2006); 407-417
Ciência Florestal; v. 16 n. 4 (2006); 407-417
1980-5098
0103-9954
reponame:Ciência Florestal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Florestal (Online)
collection Ciência Florestal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência Florestal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciaflorestal@ufsm.br|| cienciaflorestal@gmail.com|| cf@smail.ufsm.br
_version_ 1789434744117657600