Arroz tolerante a imidazolinonas: controle do arroz vermelho, persistência de herbicidas e fluxo gênico

• Autor(a) principal: Villa, Silvio Carlos Cazarotto
• Data de Publicação: 2006
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
• dARK ID: ark:/26339/0013000015nx8
• Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/5081
• topic: Sistema clearfield; Imazapic; Imazethapyr; IRGA 422 CL; Only®; Tuno CL; Clearfield system; Imazapic; Imazethapyr; IRGA 422 CL; Only®; Tuno CL; CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA

Red rice (Oryza spp.) is one of the main limiting factors to rice (O. sativa L.) yield. After several decades searching for red rice control tools, it was developed imidazolinone tolerant rice, to selectively control red rice. To better understand this technology it were conducted two experiments in 2004/05, in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. The first experiment (Chapter I) had the objective of: 1) evaluate red rice control by imidazolinone herbicides in Clearfield rice; 2) evaluate the imidazolinone herbicide carryover effect on rygrass and non-tolerant rice (IRGA 417) and 3) evaluate the outcrossing rates between Clearfield rice and red rice. The herbicides tested control red rice. Although injury to Clearfield rice was observed, the herbicide did not affected yield. It was observed herbicide carryover to non-tolerant rice, reducing plant stand. There was natural outcrossing between Clearfield rice and red rice, at rates of 0.065%. The second experiment (Chapter II) had the objective of evaluate the herbicide Only® (imazethapyr 75 g L-1 + imazapic 25 g L-1) in different application rates and timing on two genotypes, IRGA 422 CL and Tuno CL, to the imidazolinones herbicides. When compared with the cultivar, the hybrid was more tolerant to the herbicide Only®. It was possible to apply rates of up to 2.0 L ha-1 in the hybrid, without affecting rice yield. Red rice control was total with split application of Only® in PRE and POST, with rates above 1.25 L ha-1. The most efficient treatment was with application of 0.75 L ha-1 in PRE followed by 0.5 L ha-1 in POS, because, it was the lowest rate that promoted 100% control, with relatively low toxicity to the cultivar and without affecting rice yield.