Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borges Junior, Edson
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Braga, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira [UNIFESP], Setti, Amanda Souza, Vingris, Livia S., Figueira, Rita Cássia Savio, Iaconelli Junior, Assumpto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49232
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160003
Resumo: Objective: To compare the use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) or hCG trigger in potential OHSS patients undergoing freeze-all programs. We also compared the clinical outcomes when fresh versus freeze-thawed embryo transfers were performed in cycles with a high number of retrieved oocytes. Methods: The study included potential OHSS patients who received GnRHa (n= 74) or hCG (n= 49) trigger. The protocols were compared with respect to the clinical outcomes. We also compared the clinical outcomes of cycles in which hCG trigger was used and more than 20 MII oocytes were retrieved when: fresh embryo transfer protocol (n= 153) or freeze-all protocol (n= 123) were performed. Results: A decreased serum estradiol level, a decreased number of retrieved oocytes, an increased MII retrieved rate, and decreased fertilization rate was observed in the hCG when compared with the GnRHa group. No significant differences were noted concerning clinical outcomes. When fresh cycles were compared with frozen-thawed cycles, the estradiol serum level and the number of cryopreserved embryos were higher in the frozen-thawed cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher among freeze-all cycles, as well as the implantation and cumulative pregnancy rates, when compared with fresh embryo transfer cycles. Conclusion: The use of GnRHa trigger may be a good alternative to prevent the OHSS in patients presenting an extreme ovarian response to COS, leading to similar clinical outcomes, when compared with the traditional hCG trigger. Moreover, our findings demonstrated that the strategy of freezing-all embryos not only decreases the risk of OHSS but also leads to a better pregnancy rate.
id UFSP_ce5bc5b7aa5a16371ed577b1ab0f5176
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/49232
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Borges Junior, EdsonBraga, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira [UNIFESP]Setti, Amanda SouzaVingris, Livia S.Figueira, Rita Cássia SavioIaconelli Junior, Assumpto2019-01-21T10:29:28Z2019-01-21T10:29:28Z2016Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 20, n. 1, p. 8-12, 2016.1517-5693http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49232http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.2016000310.5935/1518-0557.20160003WOS:000405249100003Objective: To compare the use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) or hCG trigger in potential OHSS patients undergoing freeze-all programs. We also compared the clinical outcomes when fresh versus freeze-thawed embryo transfers were performed in cycles with a high number of retrieved oocytes. Methods: The study included potential OHSS patients who received GnRHa (n= 74) or hCG (n= 49) trigger. The protocols were compared with respect to the clinical outcomes. We also compared the clinical outcomes of cycles in which hCG trigger was used and more than 20 MII oocytes were retrieved when: fresh embryo transfer protocol (n= 153) or freeze-all protocol (n= 123) were performed. Results: A decreased serum estradiol level, a decreased number of retrieved oocytes, an increased MII retrieved rate, and decreased fertilization rate was observed in the hCG when compared with the GnRHa group. No significant differences were noted concerning clinical outcomes. When fresh cycles were compared with frozen-thawed cycles, the estradiol serum level and the number of cryopreserved embryos were higher in the frozen-thawed cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher among freeze-all cycles, as well as the implantation and cumulative pregnancy rates, when compared with fresh embryo transfer cycles. Conclusion: The use of GnRHa trigger may be a good alternative to prevent the OHSS in patients presenting an extreme ovarian response to COS, leading to similar clinical outcomes, when compared with the traditional hCG trigger. Moreover, our findings demonstrated that the strategy of freezing-all embryos not only decreases the risk of OHSS but also leads to a better pregnancy rate.Fertility – Medical Group - Sao Paulo – Brazil[Borges, Edson, Jr.Sapientiae Institute – Centro de Estudos e Pesquisa em Reprodução AssistidaDisciplina de Urologia, Área de Reprodução Humana, Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de São PauloDisciplina de Urologia, Área de Reprodução Humana, Departamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de São PauloWeb of Science8-12engRevista De Saude PublicaJornal Brasileiro De Reproducao AssistidaOhssFreezingThawingHcgGnrhaTriggerOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeFinal Oocyte MaturationIn-Vitro FertilizationLow-Dose HcgGnrh AgonistEmbryo-TransferInjectionFreshCombinationPreventionStrategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cyclesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/492322021-09-30 11:04:49.202metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/49232Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:13:20.028225Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
title Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
spellingShingle Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
Borges Junior, Edson
Ohss
Freezing
Thawing
Hcg
Gnrha
TriggerOvarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Final Oocyte Maturation
In-Vitro Fertilization
Low-Dose Hcg
Gnrh Agonist
Embryo-Transfer
Injection
Fresh
Combination
Prevention
title_short Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
title_full Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
title_fullStr Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
title_sort Strategies for the management of ohss: results from freezing-all cycles
author Borges Junior, Edson
author_facet Borges Junior, Edson
Braga, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Setti, Amanda Souza
Vingris, Livia S.
Figueira, Rita Cássia Savio
Iaconelli Junior, Assumpto
author_role author
author2 Braga, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Setti, Amanda Souza
Vingris, Livia S.
Figueira, Rita Cássia Savio
Iaconelli Junior, Assumpto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borges Junior, Edson
Braga, Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira [UNIFESP]
Setti, Amanda Souza
Vingris, Livia S.
Figueira, Rita Cássia Savio
Iaconelli Junior, Assumpto
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ohss
Freezing
Thawing
Hcg
Gnrha
TriggerOvarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Final Oocyte Maturation
In-Vitro Fertilization
Low-Dose Hcg
Gnrh Agonist
Embryo-Transfer
Injection
Fresh
Combination
Prevention
topic Ohss
Freezing
Thawing
Hcg
Gnrha
TriggerOvarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome
Final Oocyte Maturation
In-Vitro Fertilization
Low-Dose Hcg
Gnrh Agonist
Embryo-Transfer
Injection
Fresh
Combination
Prevention
description Objective: To compare the use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) or hCG trigger in potential OHSS patients undergoing freeze-all programs. We also compared the clinical outcomes when fresh versus freeze-thawed embryo transfers were performed in cycles with a high number of retrieved oocytes. Methods: The study included potential OHSS patients who received GnRHa (n= 74) or hCG (n= 49) trigger. The protocols were compared with respect to the clinical outcomes. We also compared the clinical outcomes of cycles in which hCG trigger was used and more than 20 MII oocytes were retrieved when: fresh embryo transfer protocol (n= 153) or freeze-all protocol (n= 123) were performed. Results: A decreased serum estradiol level, a decreased number of retrieved oocytes, an increased MII retrieved rate, and decreased fertilization rate was observed in the hCG when compared with the GnRHa group. No significant differences were noted concerning clinical outcomes. When fresh cycles were compared with frozen-thawed cycles, the estradiol serum level and the number of cryopreserved embryos were higher in the frozen-thawed cycles. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher among freeze-all cycles, as well as the implantation and cumulative pregnancy rates, when compared with fresh embryo transfer cycles. Conclusion: The use of GnRHa trigger may be a good alternative to prevent the OHSS in patients presenting an extreme ovarian response to COS, leading to similar clinical outcomes, when compared with the traditional hCG trigger. Moreover, our findings demonstrated that the strategy of freezing-all embryos not only decreases the risk of OHSS but also leads to a better pregnancy rate.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-01-21T10:29:28Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-01-21T10:29:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 20, n. 1, p. 8-12, 2016.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49232
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160003
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1517-5693
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.5935/1518-0557.20160003
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000405249100003
identifier_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida. Ribeirao, v. 20, n. 1, p. 8-12, 2016.
1517-5693
10.5935/1518-0557.20160003
WOS:000405249100003
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49232
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20160003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Brasileiro De Reproducao Assistida
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 8-12
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista De Saude Publica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista De Saude Publica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460264184643584