Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Cristovam, Priscila Cardoso [UNIFESP], Martins, Caio Marques [UNIFESP], Covre, Joyce Luciana [UNIFESP], Sobrinho, Juliana Aparecida [UNIFESP], Ricardo, José Reinaldo da Silva [UNIFESP], Hazarbassanov, Rossen Myhailov [UNIFESP], Hoefling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP], Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP], Nishi, Mauro [UNIFESP], Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44939
http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v19/69/
Resumo: Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three culture media for growth, proliferation, differentiation, and viability of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial progenitor cells.Methods: Limbal epithelial progenitor cell cultures were established from ten human corneal rims and grew on plastic wells in three culture media: supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM), keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM), and Epilife. The performance of culturing limbal epithelial progenitor cells in each medium was evaluated according to the following parameters: growth area of epithelial migration; immunocytochemistry for adenosine 5'-triphosphate-binding cassette member 2 (ABCG2), p63, Ki67, cytokeratin 3 (CK3), and vimentin (VMT) and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for CK3, ABCG2, and p63, and cell viability using Hoechst staining.Results: Limbal epithelial progenitor cells cultivated in SHEM showed a tendency to faster migration, compared to KSFM and Epilife. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that proliferated cells in the SHEM had lower expression for markers related to progenitor epithelial cells (ABCG2) and putative progenitor cells (p63), and a higher percentage of positive cells for differentiated epithelium (CK3) when compared to KSFM and Epilife. In PCR analysis, ABCG2 expression was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM. Expression of p63 was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM and KSFM. However, CK3 expression was statistically lower for KSFM compared to SHEM.Conclusions: Based on our findings, we concluded that cells cultured in KSFM and Epilife media presented a higher percentage of limbal epithelial progenitor cells, compared to SHEM.
id UFSP_e7fbd15aebc9a7de26f86cbfd7e82c0a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/44939
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]Cristovam, Priscila Cardoso [UNIFESP]Martins, Caio Marques [UNIFESP]Covre, Joyce Luciana [UNIFESP]Sobrinho, Juliana Aparecida [UNIFESP]Ricardo, José Reinaldo da Silva [UNIFESP]Hazarbassanov, Rossen Myhailov [UNIFESP]Hoefling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP]Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP]Nishi, Mauro [UNIFESP]Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)2018-06-18T11:04:12Z2018-06-18T11:04:12Z2013-01-17Molecular Vision. Atlanta: Molecular Vision, v. 19, p. 69-77, 2013.1090-0535http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44939http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v19/69/WOS:000314909100001Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three culture media for growth, proliferation, differentiation, and viability of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial progenitor cells.Methods: Limbal epithelial progenitor cell cultures were established from ten human corneal rims and grew on plastic wells in three culture media: supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM), keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM), and Epilife. The performance of culturing limbal epithelial progenitor cells in each medium was evaluated according to the following parameters: growth area of epithelial migration; immunocytochemistry for adenosine 5'-triphosphate-binding cassette member 2 (ABCG2), p63, Ki67, cytokeratin 3 (CK3), and vimentin (VMT) and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for CK3, ABCG2, and p63, and cell viability using Hoechst staining.Results: Limbal epithelial progenitor cells cultivated in SHEM showed a tendency to faster migration, compared to KSFM and Epilife. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that proliferated cells in the SHEM had lower expression for markers related to progenitor epithelial cells (ABCG2) and putative progenitor cells (p63), and a higher percentage of positive cells for differentiated epithelium (CK3) when compared to KSFM and Epilife. In PCR analysis, ABCG2 expression was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM. Expression of p63 was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM and KSFM. However, CK3 expression was statistically lower for KSFM compared to SHEM.Conclusions: Based on our findings, we concluded that cells cultured in KSFM and Epilife media presented a higher percentage of limbal epithelial progenitor cells, compared to SHEM.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, CASO, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Cornea & External Dis Serv, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, CASO, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Cornea & External Dis Serv, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Science69-77engMolecular VisionMolecular VisionComparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cellsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP11600/449392021-10-05 22:10:48.961metadata only accessoai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/44939Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:34652023-05-25T12:13:22.589560Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
title Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
spellingShingle Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]
title_short Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
title_full Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
title_fullStr Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
title_sort Comparison of culture media for ex vivo cultivation of limbal epithelial progenitor cells
author Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]
author_facet Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]
Cristovam, Priscila Cardoso [UNIFESP]
Martins, Caio Marques [UNIFESP]
Covre, Joyce Luciana [UNIFESP]
Sobrinho, Juliana Aparecida [UNIFESP]
Ricardo, José Reinaldo da Silva [UNIFESP]
Hazarbassanov, Rossen Myhailov [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP]
Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP]
Nishi, Mauro [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Cristovam, Priscila Cardoso [UNIFESP]
Martins, Caio Marques [UNIFESP]
Covre, Joyce Luciana [UNIFESP]
Sobrinho, Juliana Aparecida [UNIFESP]
Ricardo, José Reinaldo da Silva [UNIFESP]
Hazarbassanov, Rossen Myhailov [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP]
Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP]
Nishi, Mauro [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.institution.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro, Renata Ruoco [UNIFESP]
Cristovam, Priscila Cardoso [UNIFESP]
Martins, Caio Marques [UNIFESP]
Covre, Joyce Luciana [UNIFESP]
Sobrinho, Juliana Aparecida [UNIFESP]
Ricardo, José Reinaldo da Silva [UNIFESP]
Hazarbassanov, Rossen Myhailov [UNIFESP]
Hoefling-Lima, Ana Luisa [UNIFESP]
Belfort, Rubens Junior [UNIFESP]
Nishi, Mauro [UNIFESP]
Gomes, José Álvaro Pereira [UNIFESP]
description Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three culture media for growth, proliferation, differentiation, and viability of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial progenitor cells.Methods: Limbal epithelial progenitor cell cultures were established from ten human corneal rims and grew on plastic wells in three culture media: supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM), keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM), and Epilife. The performance of culturing limbal epithelial progenitor cells in each medium was evaluated according to the following parameters: growth area of epithelial migration; immunocytochemistry for adenosine 5'-triphosphate-binding cassette member 2 (ABCG2), p63, Ki67, cytokeratin 3 (CK3), and vimentin (VMT) and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for CK3, ABCG2, and p63, and cell viability using Hoechst staining.Results: Limbal epithelial progenitor cells cultivated in SHEM showed a tendency to faster migration, compared to KSFM and Epilife. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that proliferated cells in the SHEM had lower expression for markers related to progenitor epithelial cells (ABCG2) and putative progenitor cells (p63), and a higher percentage of positive cells for differentiated epithelium (CK3) when compared to KSFM and Epilife. In PCR analysis, ABCG2 expression was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM. Expression of p63 was statistically higher for Epilife compared to SHEM and KSFM. However, CK3 expression was statistically lower for KSFM compared to SHEM.Conclusions: Based on our findings, we concluded that cells cultured in KSFM and Epilife media presented a higher percentage of limbal epithelial progenitor cells, compared to SHEM.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-01-17
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-06-18T11:04:12Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2018-06-18T11:04:12Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv Molecular Vision. Atlanta: Molecular Vision, v. 19, p. 69-77, 2013.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44939
http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v19/69/
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1090-0535
dc.identifier.wos.none.fl_str_mv WOS:000314909100001
identifier_str_mv Molecular Vision. Atlanta: Molecular Vision, v. 19, p. 69-77, 2013.
1090-0535
WOS:000314909100001
url http://repositorio.unifesp.br/11600/44939
http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v19/69/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Vision
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 69-77
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Vision
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Molecular Vision
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1783460264231829504