THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Observatório |
Texto Completo: | https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976 |
Resumo: | The article analyzes the trial of the action of habeas corpus 126,292 / SP by the Supreme Court, occurred on February 17, 2016, in which, from the examination of the concept and limits of the principle of the state of innocence presumption, it is now admitted the execution of the penalty after the confirmatory decision about the conviction pronounced by the second degree Court. The present study takes as reference the theory of argumentation by Neil MacCormick, especially considering that the judgment meets the essential elements to be contained in a judicial decision, which are consistency, coherence and universality. Initially, it is lectured about the concept of the principle of presumption of innocence and its legal nature. The second topic of the article seeks to summarize the content of the decision under study, to then analyze the arguments contained in the votes of ministers, to then review the terms of the judgment from the perspective of the proposed by Neil MacCormick. It is concluded that the decision attends to the universality required, but does not fulfill the requisites of coherence and consistency, especially considering it was taken by a majority vote and with the analysis of the arguments contained therein. The methodology used is literature, doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential. |
id |
UFT-7_94a8b5d6902073313634d097c7a958f3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/4976 |
network_acronym_str |
UFT-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista Observatório |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISIONEL JUICIO DEL HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP POR EL SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL BAJO LA ÓPTICA DEL PENSAMIENTO DE NEIL MACCORMICK SOBRE ARGUMENTACIÓN DE LA DECISIÓN JUDICIALO JULGAMENTO DO HABEAS CORPUS 126.292/SP PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL SOB A ÓPTICA DO PENSAMENTO DE NEIL MACCORMICK SOBRE ARGUMENTAÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIALPresumption of innocenceExecution PenaltyCriminal convictionPresumption of innocenceExecution PenaltyCriminal convictionPresunción de inocenciaEjecución PenaCondenación penalPresunción de inocenciaEjecución PenaCondenación penalPresunção de inocênciaExecução PenalCondenação PenalPresunção de inocênciaExecução PenalCondenação PenalThe article analyzes the trial of the action of habeas corpus 126,292 / SP by the Supreme Court, occurred on February 17, 2016, in which, from the examination of the concept and limits of the principle of the state of innocence presumption, it is now admitted the execution of the penalty after the confirmatory decision about the conviction pronounced by the second degree Court. The present study takes as reference the theory of argumentation by Neil MacCormick, especially considering that the judgment meets the essential elements to be contained in a judicial decision, which are consistency, coherence and universality. Initially, it is lectured about the concept of the principle of presumption of innocence and its legal nature. The second topic of the article seeks to summarize the content of the decision under study, to then analyze the arguments contained in the votes of ministers, to then review the terms of the judgment from the perspective of the proposed by Neil MacCormick. It is concluded that the decision attends to the universality required, but does not fulfill the requisites of coherence and consistency, especially considering it was taken by a majority vote and with the analysis of the arguments contained therein. The methodology used is literature, doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential. El artículo analiza el juicio de la acción de habeas corpus 126.292 / SP por el Supremo Tribunal Federal, ocurrido el 17 de febrero de 2016, en el cual, a partir del examen del concepto y de los límites del principio de la presunción del estado de inocencia, se pasó a admitir la ejecución de la pena tras la decisión confirmatoria de la condena por el juicio de segundo grado. El estudio presentado toma como referencia la teoría de argumentación de Neil MacCormick, especialmente considerando que la sentencia atiende a los elementos esenciales que deben constar en una decisión judicial, cuáles son, consistencia, coherencia y universalidad. Inicialmente, se disculpó sobre el concepto del principio de la presunción de inocencia, así como su naturaleza jurídica. En el segundo tópico del artículo, se busca resumir el contenido de la decisión en estudio, para luego ponderar sobre los argumentos contenidos en los votos de los ministros, para posteriormente analizar los términos de la sentencia bajo el prisma de lo propuesto por Neil MacCormick. Se concluye que la decisión cumple el requisito de la universalidad, pero no satisface plenamente los requisitos de coherencia y consistencia, especialmente considerando haber sido adoptada por mayoría de votos así como con el análisis de los argumentos en ella contenidos. La metodología utilizada es bibliográfica, doctrinal, legislativa y jurisprudencial. O artigo analisa o julgamento da ação de habeas corpus 126.292/SP pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, ocorrido em 17 de fevereiro de 2016, no qual, a partir do exame do conceito e dos limites do princípio da presunção do estado de inocência, passou-se a admitir a execução da pena após a decisão confirmatória da condenação pelo juízo de segundo grau. O estudo apresentado toma como referência a teoria de argumentação de Neil MacCormick, especialmente considerando que o acórdão atende aos elementos essenciais que devem constar em uma decisão judicial, quais sejam, consistência, coerência e universalidade. Inicialmente, disserta-se sobre o conceito do princípio da presunção de inocência, bem como sua natureza jurídica. No segundo tópico do artigo, busca-se resumir o teor da decisão em estudo, para a seguir ponderar acerca dos argumentos contidos nos votos dos ministros, para posteriormente analisar os termos do acórdão sob o prisma do proposto por Neil MacCormick. Conclui-se que a decisão atende ao requisito da universalidade, porém não satisfaz plenamente aos requisitos da coerência e consistência, especialmente considerando ter sido tomada por maioria de votos bem como com a análise dos argumentos nela contidos. A metodologia utilizada é bibliográfica, doutrinária, legislativa e jurisprudencial.Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfapplication/epub+zipapplication/octet-streamapplication/zipapplication/x-gzipapplication/ziphttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/497610.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n5p750Observatory Journal; Vol. 4 No. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787Observatorio Magazine; Vol. 4 Núm. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787Observatoire Journal; Vol. 4 No. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787Revista Observatório ; v. 4 n. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-7872447-426610.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n5reponame:Revista Observatórioinstname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)instacron:UFTporhttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13722https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13883https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13903https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13914https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13925https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13936Século XX/XXICopyright (c) 2018 Revista Observatórioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Martonio Mont’Alverne BarretoMota, Rafael Gonçalves2022-03-04T13:10:10Zoai:ojs.revista.uft.edu.br:article/4976Revistahttps://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/oai2447-42662447-4266opendoar:2022-03-04T13:10:10Revista Observatório - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION EL JUICIO DEL HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP POR EL SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL BAJO LA ÓPTICA DEL PENSAMIENTO DE NEIL MACCORMICK SOBRE ARGUMENTACIÓN DE LA DECISIÓN JUDICIAL O JULGAMENTO DO HABEAS CORPUS 126.292/SP PELO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL SOB A ÓPTICA DO PENSAMENTO DE NEIL MACCORMICK SOBRE ARGUMENTAÇÃO DA DECISÃO JUDICIAL |
title |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
spellingShingle |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION Lima, Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal |
title_short |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
title_full |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
title_fullStr |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
title_sort |
THE TRIAL OF HABEAS CORPUS 126.292 / SP THE SUPREME FEDERAL COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF NEIL MACCORMICK THINKING ABOUT ARGUMENT OF JUDICIAL DECISION |
author |
Lima, Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto |
author_facet |
Lima, Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto Mota, Rafael Gonçalves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mota, Rafael Gonçalves |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Martonio Mont’Alverne Barreto Mota, Rafael Gonçalves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal |
topic |
Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presumption of innocence Execution Penalty Criminal conviction Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunción de inocencia Ejecución Pena Condenación penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal Presunção de inocência Execução Penal Condenação Penal |
description |
The article analyzes the trial of the action of habeas corpus 126,292 / SP by the Supreme Court, occurred on February 17, 2016, in which, from the examination of the concept and limits of the principle of the state of innocence presumption, it is now admitted the execution of the penalty after the confirmatory decision about the conviction pronounced by the second degree Court. The present study takes as reference the theory of argumentation by Neil MacCormick, especially considering that the judgment meets the essential elements to be contained in a judicial decision, which are consistency, coherence and universality. Initially, it is lectured about the concept of the principle of presumption of innocence and its legal nature. The second topic of the article seeks to summarize the content of the decision under study, to then analyze the arguments contained in the votes of ministers, to then review the terms of the judgment from the perspective of the proposed by Neil MacCormick. It is concluded that the decision attends to the universality required, but does not fulfill the requisites of coherence and consistency, especially considering it was taken by a majority vote and with the analysis of the arguments contained therein. The methodology used is literature, doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976 10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n5p750 |
url |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n5p750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13722 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13883 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13903 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13914 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13925 https://sistemas.uft.edu.br/periodicos/index.php/observatorio/article/view/4976/13936 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Observatório info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Observatório |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/epub+zip application/octet-stream application/zip application/x-gzip application/zip |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Século XX/XXI |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Observatory Journal; Vol. 4 No. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787 Observatorio Magazine; Vol. 4 Núm. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787 Observatoire Journal; Vol. 4 No. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787 Revista Observatório ; v. 4 n. 5 (2018): Vol. 4 N. 5 (Multi)letramentos, Formação de Professor e Tecnologias na Cibercultura Ago 2018; 750-787 2447-4266 10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n5 reponame:Revista Observatório instname:Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) instacron:UFT |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) |
instacron_str |
UFT |
institution |
UFT |
reponame_str |
Revista Observatório |
collection |
Revista Observatório |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Observatório - Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798313247059738624 |