Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alvarenga, Paula Batista de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Danilo, Santos, Thaisa Reis, Rezende, Soraia Rage, Ramos, Oglênia Pereira, Troncha, Paula Mara Ribeiro, Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida, Noleto, Pablo Gomes, Headley, Selwyn Arlington, Santos, Ricarda Maria dos, Saut, João Paulo Elsen
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37263
Resumo: This study evaluated the prevalence of cervicitis and endometritis and their interrelations in crossbred dairy cows that were more than 60 days in milk (DIM), and the efficiency of the cytology technique (cytobrush) and histology as diagnostic methods for these diseases. The reproductive tracts (n=149) derived from cows were collected from a slaughterhouse and grossly evaluated to determine uterine involution and the phase of the estrous cycle. Subsequently, cervical and uterine cytological evaluations were done to characterize the inflammatory response as cervicitis (with a neutrophilic count greater than 5%) or endometritis (with more than 6% neutrophils). Additionally, randomly obtained samples from the cervix and uterus were collected for histological evaluation. Cytological evaluation revealed that the frequency of cervicitis was 6% (9/149), and endometritis was diagnosed in 8.1% (12/149) of the samples; both inflammatory reactions were diagnosed 2.1% (3/149) in three of these. Histological evaluation revealed that of the cows diagnosed with cervicitis by cytology, 66.6% (6/9) had no inflammatory reaction in the cervical mucosa, and 33.3% (3/9) had mild inflammation in this region. Histological evaluation of the uterine horn revealed that of the 12 cows diagnosed with endometritis by cytology, 50% (6/12) of these had a histological diagnosis of mild and moderate inflammatory responses, 8.3% (1/12) of these demonstrated a severe inflammatory response, while no inflammatory reaction was identified in 41.7% (5/12) of the endometrial biopsies evaluated. In conclusion, the endometrial and cervical inflammatory response diagnosed by the cytobrush technique persisted in 12.1% of the cows. Comparatively, the frequency of the inflammatory responses at the cervix and uterus was reduced by histological analysis relative to cytological evaluation with the cytobrush technique.
id UFU-14_be5e392765dfa832550b07e3b1c4f001
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/37263
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows Prevalência de processos inflamatórios no sistema reprodutivo de vacas leiteiras mestiçasCervicitisCytologyCytobrushEndometritisHistologyAgricultural Sciences This study evaluated the prevalence of cervicitis and endometritis and their interrelations in crossbred dairy cows that were more than 60 days in milk (DIM), and the efficiency of the cytology technique (cytobrush) and histology as diagnostic methods for these diseases. The reproductive tracts (n=149) derived from cows were collected from a slaughterhouse and grossly evaluated to determine uterine involution and the phase of the estrous cycle. Subsequently, cervical and uterine cytological evaluations were done to characterize the inflammatory response as cervicitis (with a neutrophilic count greater than 5%) or endometritis (with more than 6% neutrophils). Additionally, randomly obtained samples from the cervix and uterus were collected for histological evaluation. Cytological evaluation revealed that the frequency of cervicitis was 6% (9/149), and endometritis was diagnosed in 8.1% (12/149) of the samples; both inflammatory reactions were diagnosed 2.1% (3/149) in three of these. Histological evaluation revealed that of the cows diagnosed with cervicitis by cytology, 66.6% (6/9) had no inflammatory reaction in the cervical mucosa, and 33.3% (3/9) had mild inflammation in this region. Histological evaluation of the uterine horn revealed that of the 12 cows diagnosed with endometritis by cytology, 50% (6/12) of these had a histological diagnosis of mild and moderate inflammatory responses, 8.3% (1/12) of these demonstrated a severe inflammatory response, while no inflammatory reaction was identified in 41.7% (5/12) of the endometrial biopsies evaluated. In conclusion, the endometrial and cervical inflammatory response diagnosed by the cytobrush technique persisted in 12.1% of the cows. Comparatively, the frequency of the inflammatory responses at the cervix and uterus was reduced by histological analysis relative to cytological evaluation with the cytobrush technique.O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a prevalência de cervicite e endometrite citológicas e suas inter-relações em vacas leiteiras mestiças com mais de 60 dias pós-parto (DPP), bem como avaliar as técnicas de citologia (cytobrush) e histologia como métodos diagnósticos para estas doenças. Foram utilizados 149 tratos reprodutivos de vacas com mais de 60 DPP de abatedouro e avaliados macroscopicamente para determinar a involução uterina e a fase do ciclo estral. Posteriormente, realizou-se citologia cervical e uterina para o diagnóstico de inflamação utilizando como ponto de corte, contagem de polimorfonucleares (PMN) superior a 5% e 6%, respectivamente, para cervicite e endometrite citológica. Também foram coletadas amostras de cérvix e útero para histologia. Do total de vacas, identificaram-se 6% (9/149) com cervicite e 8,1% (12/149) com endometrite citológica, sendo três destes animais (2,1%) com ambas asinflamações. Histologicamente, dos animais com cervicite citológica, 66,6% (6/9) não apresentaram infiltrado inflamatório na mucosa cervical e 33,3% (3/9) apresentaram inflamação leve. A histologia uterina mostrou que de 12 vacas com endometrite citológica, 50% (6/12) apresentaram infiltrados inflamatórios leves a moderados, 8,3% (1/12) grave e 41,7% (5/12) não tinham Inflamação endometrial. Concluiu-se que a inflamação endometrial e cervical, por meio da técnica de citologia, persistiu em 12,1% das vacas com mais de 60 DPP. Quando se utiliza a histologia como método de diagnóstico, a detecção de inflamação cervical e uterina é inferior ao detectado pela técnica de citologia por meio do esfregaço endometrial (cytobrush).EDUFU2018-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/3726310.14393/BJ-v34n3a2018-37263Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018): May/June; 703-708Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 3 (2018): MAI/JUNE; 703-7081981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUporhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37263/22233Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2018 Paula Batista de Alvarenga, Danilo Oliveira, Thaisa Reis Santos, Soraia Rage Rezende, Oglênia Pereira Ramos, Paula Mara Ribeiro Troncha, Alessandra Aparecida Medeiros, Pablo Gomes Noleto, Selwyn Arlington Headley, Ricarda Maria dos Santos, João Paulo Elsen Sauthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlvarenga, Paula Batista deOliveira, DaniloSantos, Thaisa ReisRezende, Soraia RageRamos, Oglênia PereiraTroncha, Paula Mara RibeiroMedeiros, Alessandra AparecidaNoleto, Pablo Gomes Headley, Selwyn ArlingtonSantos, Ricarda Maria dosSaut, João Paulo Elsen2022-02-15T01:17:46Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/37263Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-15T01:17:46Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
Prevalência de processos inflamatórios no sistema reprodutivo de vacas leiteiras mestiças
title Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
spellingShingle Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
Alvarenga, Paula Batista de
Cervicitis
Cytology
Cytobrush
Endometritis
Histology
Agricultural Sciences
title_short Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
title_full Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
title_fullStr Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
title_sort Prevalence of inflamatory processes in the reproductive tracts of crossbred dairy cows
author Alvarenga, Paula Batista de
author_facet Alvarenga, Paula Batista de
Oliveira, Danilo
Santos, Thaisa Reis
Rezende, Soraia Rage
Ramos, Oglênia Pereira
Troncha, Paula Mara Ribeiro
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Noleto, Pablo Gomes
Headley, Selwyn Arlington
Santos, Ricarda Maria dos
Saut, João Paulo Elsen
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Danilo
Santos, Thaisa Reis
Rezende, Soraia Rage
Ramos, Oglênia Pereira
Troncha, Paula Mara Ribeiro
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Noleto, Pablo Gomes
Headley, Selwyn Arlington
Santos, Ricarda Maria dos
Saut, João Paulo Elsen
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alvarenga, Paula Batista de
Oliveira, Danilo
Santos, Thaisa Reis
Rezende, Soraia Rage
Ramos, Oglênia Pereira
Troncha, Paula Mara Ribeiro
Medeiros, Alessandra Aparecida
Noleto, Pablo Gomes
Headley, Selwyn Arlington
Santos, Ricarda Maria dos
Saut, João Paulo Elsen
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cervicitis
Cytology
Cytobrush
Endometritis
Histology
Agricultural Sciences
topic Cervicitis
Cytology
Cytobrush
Endometritis
Histology
Agricultural Sciences
description This study evaluated the prevalence of cervicitis and endometritis and their interrelations in crossbred dairy cows that were more than 60 days in milk (DIM), and the efficiency of the cytology technique (cytobrush) and histology as diagnostic methods for these diseases. The reproductive tracts (n=149) derived from cows were collected from a slaughterhouse and grossly evaluated to determine uterine involution and the phase of the estrous cycle. Subsequently, cervical and uterine cytological evaluations were done to characterize the inflammatory response as cervicitis (with a neutrophilic count greater than 5%) or endometritis (with more than 6% neutrophils). Additionally, randomly obtained samples from the cervix and uterus were collected for histological evaluation. Cytological evaluation revealed that the frequency of cervicitis was 6% (9/149), and endometritis was diagnosed in 8.1% (12/149) of the samples; both inflammatory reactions were diagnosed 2.1% (3/149) in three of these. Histological evaluation revealed that of the cows diagnosed with cervicitis by cytology, 66.6% (6/9) had no inflammatory reaction in the cervical mucosa, and 33.3% (3/9) had mild inflammation in this region. Histological evaluation of the uterine horn revealed that of the 12 cows diagnosed with endometritis by cytology, 50% (6/12) of these had a histological diagnosis of mild and moderate inflammatory responses, 8.3% (1/12) of these demonstrated a severe inflammatory response, while no inflammatory reaction was identified in 41.7% (5/12) of the endometrial biopsies evaluated. In conclusion, the endometrial and cervical inflammatory response diagnosed by the cytobrush technique persisted in 12.1% of the cows. Comparatively, the frequency of the inflammatory responses at the cervix and uterus was reduced by histological analysis relative to cytological evaluation with the cytobrush technique.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37263
10.14393/BJ-v34n3a2018-37263
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37263
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v34n3a2018-37263
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/37263/22233
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 34 No. 3 (2018): May/June; 703-708
Bioscience Journal ; v. 34 n. 3 (2018): MAI/JUNE; 703-708
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069077826502656