Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Câmara, Priscila Fernandes Meireles
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ferreira Júnior, Marcos Antonio, Vitor, Allyne Fortes, Frota, Oleci Pereira, Santos, Viviane Euzébia Pereira, Cruz, Giovanna Karinny Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Bioscience journal (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54047
Resumo: Fibrinolytic Therapy (FT) is an important form of treatment for cases of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), especially in those places where Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is not available, which is the main form of treatment and can be used even in the prehospital care. Aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of the use of FT in prehospital care for treating patients with AMI. This research covered a total of 53 patients and was carried out from march to october 2017, referring to the care provided from january 2015 to december 2016 in two stages, in which the first occurred with the Mobile Emergency Service (SAMU) and Walk-in Emergency Care Units (UPA), and the second in the referenced hospital services as gateways to those units. Data were collected from secondary sources. The clinical outcomes of FT considered in the form of absolute and relative frequencies and measures of central tendency were considered. The main signs and symptoms at admission were chest pain (84.62%), sweating (36.54%), dyspnea (26.92%), hypertension (19.23%), nausea (17.31%), malaise (17.31%) and emesis (13.46%). The main characteristic of chest discomfort was chest pain (70.45%). The FT drug administered in all patients was tenecteplase. The median time from symptom-to-door was 180 minutes, while symptom-reperfusion was 300 minutes and door-to-needle 160 minutes. Regarding the outcome, 74.47% had clinical improvement, 19.15% died, 4.25% had refractory AMI and 2.13% had reinfarction. The main characteristic of clinical improvement was the reversal of chest pain (68.57%), characterized as myocardial reperfusion criteria. The present study presented the main outcomes of FT use with improvement of those patients who were treated with it, and shorter times related to chest discomfort and the administration of FT were responsible for increasing the outcomes of clinical improvement and decreasing the outcome of death.
id UFU-14_cbe7a9570a720e61576dafa8797a1d1d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/54047
network_acronym_str UFU-14
network_name_str Bioscience journal (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarctionDESFECHOS CLÍNICOS DO USO DA TERAPIA FIBRINOLÍTICA PARA TRATAMENTO PRÉ-HOSPITALAR DO INFARTO AGUDO DO MIOCÁRDIO Emergency Medical ServicesFibrinolyticsMyocardial infarctionThrombolytic therapy.Fibrinolytic Therapy (FT) is an important form of treatment for cases of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), especially in those places where Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is not available, which is the main form of treatment and can be used even in the prehospital care. Aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of the use of FT in prehospital care for treating patients with AMI. This research covered a total of 53 patients and was carried out from march to october 2017, referring to the care provided from january 2015 to december 2016 in two stages, in which the first occurred with the Mobile Emergency Service (SAMU) and Walk-in Emergency Care Units (UPA), and the second in the referenced hospital services as gateways to those units. Data were collected from secondary sources. The clinical outcomes of FT considered in the form of absolute and relative frequencies and measures of central tendency were considered. The main signs and symptoms at admission were chest pain (84.62%), sweating (36.54%), dyspnea (26.92%), hypertension (19.23%), nausea (17.31%), malaise (17.31%) and emesis (13.46%). The main characteristic of chest discomfort was chest pain (70.45%). The FT drug administered in all patients was tenecteplase. The median time from symptom-to-door was 180 minutes, while symptom-reperfusion was 300 minutes and door-to-needle 160 minutes. Regarding the outcome, 74.47% had clinical improvement, 19.15% died, 4.25% had refractory AMI and 2.13% had reinfarction. The main characteristic of clinical improvement was the reversal of chest pain (68.57%), characterized as myocardial reperfusion criteria. The present study presented the main outcomes of FT use with improvement of those patients who were treated with it, and shorter times related to chest discomfort and the administration of FT were responsible for increasing the outcomes of clinical improvement and decreasing the outcome of death.A terapia fibrinolítica (TF) consiste numa importante forma de tratamento para casos de infarto agudo do miocárdio (IAM), especialmente nos locais em que não está disponível a intervenção coronária percutânea primária (ICPP), que trata da principal forma de tratamento e pode ser usada mesmo em pacientes com infarto agudo do miocárdio no atendimento pré-hospitalar. Objetivou-se descrever os resultados clínicos do uso da TF no atendimento pré-hospitalar no tratamento de pacientes com IAM. Esta pesquisa foi realizada em duas etapas, nas quais a primeira ocorreu com o Serviço Móvel de Urgência (SAMU) e as Unidades de Pronto Atendimento (UPA), e a segunda nos serviços hospitalares referenciados como porta de entrada para essas unidades. Os dados foram coletados de fontes secundárias. Foram considerados os desfechos clínicos da TF considerados na forma de frequências absolutas e relativas e medidas de tendência central. Os principais sinais e sintomas na admissão foram dor no peito (84,62%), sudorese (36,54%), dispneia (26,92%), hipertensão (19,23%), náusea (17,31%), mal-estar (17,31%) e êmese (13,46%). A principal característica do desconforto no peito foi a dor no peito (70,45%). O medicamento fibrinolítico administrado em todos os pacientes foi a tenecteplase. O tempo médio entre o sintoma e a porta foi de 180 minutos, enquanto a reperfusão de sintomas foi de 300 minutos e o de porta-agulha foi de 160 minutos. Quanto ao desfecho, 74,47% apresentaram melhora clínica, 19,15% faleceram, 4,25% IAM refratário e 2,13% reinfarto. A principal característica da melhora clínica foi a reversão da precordialgia (68,57%), caracterizada como critério de reperfusão miocárdica. O presente estudo apresentou os principais desfechos do uso da TF com melhora clínica daqueles pacientes que a utilizaram e os menores tempos relacionados ao desconforto torácico e à administração da TF foram responsáveis por aumentar os desfechos de melhora clínica e diminuir o desfecho óbito.EDUFU2021-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/5404710.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-54047Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37071Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e370711981-3163reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)instacron:UFUenghttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54047/32920Brazil; Contemporary Copyright (c) 2021 Priscila Fernandes Meireles Câmara, Marcos Antonio Ferreira Júnior, Allyne Fortes Vitor, Oleci Pereira Frota, Viviane Euzébia Pereira Santos, Giovanna Karinny Pereira Cruzhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCâmara, Priscila Fernandes MeirelesFerreira Júnior, Marcos AntonioVitor, Allyne FortesFrota, Oleci Pereira Santos, Viviane Euzébia Pereira Cruz, Giovanna Karinny Pereira2022-02-12T14:34:56Zoai:ojs.www.seer.ufu.br:article/54047Revistahttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournalPUBhttps://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/oaibiosciencej@ufu.br||1981-31631516-3725opendoar:2022-02-12T14:34:56Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
DESFECHOS CLÍNICOS DO USO DA TERAPIA FIBRINOLÍTICA PARA TRATAMENTO PRÉ-HOSPITALAR DO INFARTO AGUDO DO MIOCÁRDIO
title Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
spellingShingle Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
Câmara, Priscila Fernandes Meireles
Emergency Medical Services
Fibrinolytics
Myocardial infarction
Thrombolytic therapy.
title_short Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
title_full Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
title_sort Clinical outcomes of fibrinolytic therapy for prehospital treatment of acute myocardial infarction
author Câmara, Priscila Fernandes Meireles
author_facet Câmara, Priscila Fernandes Meireles
Ferreira Júnior, Marcos Antonio
Vitor, Allyne Fortes
Frota, Oleci Pereira
Santos, Viviane Euzébia Pereira
Cruz, Giovanna Karinny Pereira
author_role author
author2 Ferreira Júnior, Marcos Antonio
Vitor, Allyne Fortes
Frota, Oleci Pereira
Santos, Viviane Euzébia Pereira
Cruz, Giovanna Karinny Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Câmara, Priscila Fernandes Meireles
Ferreira Júnior, Marcos Antonio
Vitor, Allyne Fortes
Frota, Oleci Pereira
Santos, Viviane Euzébia Pereira
Cruz, Giovanna Karinny Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Emergency Medical Services
Fibrinolytics
Myocardial infarction
Thrombolytic therapy.
topic Emergency Medical Services
Fibrinolytics
Myocardial infarction
Thrombolytic therapy.
description Fibrinolytic Therapy (FT) is an important form of treatment for cases of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), especially in those places where Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) is not available, which is the main form of treatment and can be used even in the prehospital care. Aimed to describe the clinical outcomes of the use of FT in prehospital care for treating patients with AMI. This research covered a total of 53 patients and was carried out from march to october 2017, referring to the care provided from january 2015 to december 2016 in two stages, in which the first occurred with the Mobile Emergency Service (SAMU) and Walk-in Emergency Care Units (UPA), and the second in the referenced hospital services as gateways to those units. Data were collected from secondary sources. The clinical outcomes of FT considered in the form of absolute and relative frequencies and measures of central tendency were considered. The main signs and symptoms at admission were chest pain (84.62%), sweating (36.54%), dyspnea (26.92%), hypertension (19.23%), nausea (17.31%), malaise (17.31%) and emesis (13.46%). The main characteristic of chest discomfort was chest pain (70.45%). The FT drug administered in all patients was tenecteplase. The median time from symptom-to-door was 180 minutes, while symptom-reperfusion was 300 minutes and door-to-needle 160 minutes. Regarding the outcome, 74.47% had clinical improvement, 19.15% died, 4.25% had refractory AMI and 2.13% had reinfarction. The main characteristic of clinical improvement was the reversal of chest pain (68.57%), characterized as myocardial reperfusion criteria. The present study presented the main outcomes of FT use with improvement of those patients who were treated with it, and shorter times related to chest discomfort and the administration of FT were responsible for increasing the outcomes of clinical improvement and decreasing the outcome of death.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54047
10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-54047
url https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54047
identifier_str_mv 10.14393/BJ-v37n0a2021-54047
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/54047/32920
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFU
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioscience Journal ; Vol. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37071
Bioscience Journal ; v. 37 (2021): Continuous Publication; e37071
1981-3163
reponame:Bioscience journal (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron:UFU
instname_str Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
instacron_str UFU
institution UFU
reponame_str Bioscience journal (Online)
collection Bioscience journal (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Bioscience journal (Online) - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biosciencej@ufu.br||
_version_ 1797069082791510016