METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Fernando França da
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Magalhães, Fernando Fagner, Castro, Marco Aurélio de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Engenharia na Agricultura
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/313
Resumo: One of the parameters of greatest uncertainty related to water and irrigation management is evapotranspiration. Before selecting the determined method to estimate the reference evapotranspiraton (ETo) in a region, it is extremely important to evaluate the degree of precision of the model. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of 30 methods to estimate the ETo for Chapadão do Sul, Brazil. Meteorological data was obtained from the National Institute of Meteorology during a four year period (2008 to 2011). The standard method was Penman-Monteith-FAO56 and comparison of the results was performed by means of the determination coefficient (r2), the coefficients “a” and “b” of the linear regressions, the estimated standard error (ESE), the Willmott concordance index (d), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and confidence coefficient (c). The best methods for estimating ETo were obtained by the Penman, Stephens-Stewart, Radiation-Temperature, Turc, Hargreaves, Penman-FAO24, Thornthwaite, Abtew, Blaney-Criddle-FAO24, McCloud, Radiation, Garcia-Lopez, Modify-Thornthwaite, Global-Radiation, Hargreaves-Samani and Jensen-Haise methods. The McCloud method is recommended when only temperature data is used. The Hargreaves-Samani method can be used after calibrating its equation for the region of study. The Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Camargo, Linacre, Hamon, Ivanov, Kharrufa, Blaney-Morin, McGuiness-Bordne, Romanenko, Lungeon, Hicks-Hess, Liquid-Radiation and Tanner-Pelton methods cannot be applied to estimate the ETo in Chapadão do Sul, Brazil.
id UFV-2_71b70ca0d29cef48d4e9d0300a7135a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/313
network_acronym_str UFV-2
network_name_str Engenharia na Agricultura
repository_id_str
spelling METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MSMÉTODOS PARA ESTIMATIVA DA EVAPOTRANSPIRAÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIA PARA CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MSagrometeorologiaEToevaporaçãoirrigaçãoPenman-Monteith-FAO56One of the parameters of greatest uncertainty related to water and irrigation management is evapotranspiration. Before selecting the determined method to estimate the reference evapotranspiraton (ETo) in a region, it is extremely important to evaluate the degree of precision of the model. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of 30 methods to estimate the ETo for Chapadão do Sul, Brazil. Meteorological data was obtained from the National Institute of Meteorology during a four year period (2008 to 2011). The standard method was Penman-Monteith-FAO56 and comparison of the results was performed by means of the determination coefficient (r2), the coefficients “a” and “b” of the linear regressions, the estimated standard error (ESE), the Willmott concordance index (d), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and confidence coefficient (c). The best methods for estimating ETo were obtained by the Penman, Stephens-Stewart, Radiation-Temperature, Turc, Hargreaves, Penman-FAO24, Thornthwaite, Abtew, Blaney-Criddle-FAO24, McCloud, Radiation, Garcia-Lopez, Modify-Thornthwaite, Global-Radiation, Hargreaves-Samani and Jensen-Haise methods. The McCloud method is recommended when only temperature data is used. The Hargreaves-Samani method can be used after calibrating its equation for the region of study. The Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Camargo, Linacre, Hamon, Ivanov, Kharrufa, Blaney-Morin, McGuiness-Bordne, Romanenko, Lungeon, Hicks-Hess, Liquid-Radiation and Tanner-Pelton methods cannot be applied to estimate the ETo in Chapadão do Sul, Brazil.A evapotranspiração é um dos parâmetros de maior incerteza no gerenciamento de recursos hídricos e manejo da irrigação. Antes da escolha de determinado método para estimativa da evapotranspiração de referência (ETo) em uma região, é de extrema importância avaliar o grau de exatidão do modelo. A presente pesquisa objetivou avaliar o desempenho de 30 métodos para estimativa da ETo para Chapadão do Sul, MS. Os dados meteorológicos foram retirados do Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia no período de quatro anos (2008 a 2011). O método tomado como padrão foi o Penman-Monteith-FAO56; e a comparação dos resultados foi por meio do coeficiente de determinação (r2), dos coeficientes “a” e “b” das regressões lineares, erro-padrão da estimativa (EPE), índice de concordância de Willmott (d), coeficiente de correlação de Pearson (r) e do coeficiente de confiança (c). Os melhores métodos para estimativa da ETo foram: Penman-Original, Stephens-Stewart, Radiação-Temperatura, Turc, Hargreaves-Original, Penman-FAO24, Thornthwaite, Abtew, Blaney-Criddle-FAO24, McCloud, Radiação-FAO24, Garcia-Lopez, Thornthwaite-Modificado, Radiação-Global, Hargreaves-Samani e Jensen-Haise. Quando se tem apenas dados de temperatura, recomenda-se utilizar o método de McCloud. O método de Hargreaves-Samani poderá ser utilizado depois de sua equação receber calibração para a região de estudo. Os métodos Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Camargo, Linacre, Hamon, Ivanov, Kharrufa, Blaney-Morin, McGuiness-Bordne, Romanenko, Lungeon, Hicks-Hess, Radiação-Líquida e Tanner-Pelton não devem ser utilizados para a estimativa da ETo em Chapadão do Sul.Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV2013-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/31310.13083/reveng.v21i2.346Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2013); 159-172Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 21 n. 2 (2013); 159-1722175-68131414-398410.13083/reveng.v21i2reponame:Engenharia na Agriculturainstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/313/235Cunha, Fernando França daMagalhães, Fernando FagnerCastro, Marco Aurélio deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-19T13:08:25Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/313Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revengPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/oairevistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br2175-68131414-3984opendoar:2023-01-19T13:08:25Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
MÉTODOS PARA ESTIMATIVA DA EVAPOTRANSPIRAÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIA PARA CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
title METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
spellingShingle METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
Cunha, Fernando França da
agrometeorologia
ETo
evaporação
irrigação
Penman-Monteith-FAO56
title_short METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
title_full METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
title_fullStr METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
title_full_unstemmed METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
title_sort METHODS FOR ESTIMATING REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION FOR CHAPADÃO DO SUL - MS
author Cunha, Fernando França da
author_facet Cunha, Fernando França da
Magalhães, Fernando Fagner
Castro, Marco Aurélio de
author_role author
author2 Magalhães, Fernando Fagner
Castro, Marco Aurélio de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Fernando França da
Magalhães, Fernando Fagner
Castro, Marco Aurélio de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv agrometeorologia
ETo
evaporação
irrigação
Penman-Monteith-FAO56
topic agrometeorologia
ETo
evaporação
irrigação
Penman-Monteith-FAO56
description One of the parameters of greatest uncertainty related to water and irrigation management is evapotranspiration. Before selecting the determined method to estimate the reference evapotranspiraton (ETo) in a region, it is extremely important to evaluate the degree of precision of the model. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of 30 methods to estimate the ETo for Chapadão do Sul, Brazil. Meteorological data was obtained from the National Institute of Meteorology during a four year period (2008 to 2011). The standard method was Penman-Monteith-FAO56 and comparison of the results was performed by means of the determination coefficient (r2), the coefficients “a” and “b” of the linear regressions, the estimated standard error (ESE), the Willmott concordance index (d), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and confidence coefficient (c). The best methods for estimating ETo were obtained by the Penman, Stephens-Stewart, Radiation-Temperature, Turc, Hargreaves, Penman-FAO24, Thornthwaite, Abtew, Blaney-Criddle-FAO24, McCloud, Radiation, Garcia-Lopez, Modify-Thornthwaite, Global-Radiation, Hargreaves-Samani and Jensen-Haise methods. The McCloud method is recommended when only temperature data is used. The Hargreaves-Samani method can be used after calibrating its equation for the region of study. The Makkink, Priestley-Taylor, Camargo, Linacre, Hamon, Ivanov, Kharrufa, Blaney-Morin, McGuiness-Bordne, Romanenko, Lungeon, Hicks-Hess, Liquid-Radiation and Tanner-Pelton methods cannot be applied to estimate the ETo in Chapadão do Sul, Brazil.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/313
10.13083/reveng.v21i2.346
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/313
identifier_str_mv 10.13083/reveng.v21i2.346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/reveng/article/view/313/235
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa - UFV
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engineering in Agriculture; Vol. 21 No. 2 (2013); 159-172
Revista Engenharia na Agricultura - REVENG; v. 21 n. 2 (2013); 159-172
2175-6813
1414-3984
10.13083/reveng.v21i2
reponame:Engenharia na Agricultura
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Engenharia na Agricultura
collection Engenharia na Agricultura
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia na Agricultura - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaengenharianagricultura@gmail.com||andrerosa@ufv.br||tramitacao.reveng@gmail.com|| reveng@ufv.br
_version_ 1788355357837361152