Drip loss assessment by different analytical methods and their relationships with pork quality classification

• Autor(a) principal: Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Outros Autores: Cazedey, Henrique Pereira, Fontes, Paulo Rogério, Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza, Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9170768; http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/16882
• topic: Different analytical methods; Quality classification

We analyzed drip loss in pork by comparing the standard bag (DL), filter-paper wetness (FPW), and EZ-DripLoss methods by weighing the meat juice container and dabbed sample after 24 h and 48 h. Samples were classified into quality categories based on pH, color, and drip loss. The relationship between DL and FPW revealed the cut-off of 5% DL as corresponding to FPW of 139 mg; 1.89% when analyzed by weighing meat juice container or dabbed sample after 24 h; and 3.18% and 3.74% for those analyzed by weighing both meat juice container and dabbed sample after 48 h, respectively. Highest correlations were observed between DL and EZ when the meat juice container was weighed after 48 h (). The EZ-DripLoss method in which the meat juice container was weighed after 24 h was able to distinguish drip loss into meat-quality categories in accordance with the bag method. Therefore, this method is recommended for meat categorization because of its greater standardization and ease of application.