The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simões, João José Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Ahn, Heinz, de Souza, Antônio Artur
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
Texto Completo: https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2657
Resumo: Objective: ANEEL, the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency, regularly renews its tariff model to remunerate the electricity transmission service operators. This study focuses on the conceded rate of return of the operators’ regulatory capital. We aim to contribute to the methodological improvement of the regulator’s approach in future tariff reviews by focusing on issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Method: We critically review ANEEL’s concept of the regulatory rate of return, stressing issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Originality/Relevance: We are not aware of any research that analyzes ANEEL’s actual model for calculating the regulatory rate of return. In line with ANEEL’s search for support, we intend that our considerations will help improve the regulator’s approach and serve as stimuli to search for answers to open questions.Results: We revealed five aspects that give rise to deeper reflections. Our findings suggest that the concept for determining the regulatory rate of return could be adapted to better reflect the Brazilian financial market conditions.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: As a main finding, the sample of US electric energy companies involved in calculating the so-called ߠfactor should be reconsidered. Furthermore, to compute the weights of these companies to calculate the sample’s unleveraged ß, companies with missing data should be excluded. Moreover, instead of gathering the data for the WACC calculation from quite different periods, these periods should be aligned on a theoretical basis.
id UNB-21_779d8e8c551056a785095c68b10db76c
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/2657
network_acronym_str UNB-21
network_name_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository_id_str
spelling The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian CaseO Desafio para Determinar o WACC das Operadoras de Transmissão de Eletricidade: O Caso BrasileiroRegulationElectricity Transmission OperatorWACCCAPMRate of Return.RegulaçãoOperador de Transmissão de EletricidadeWACCCAPMTaxa de Retorno.Objective: ANEEL, the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency, regularly renews its tariff model to remunerate the electricity transmission service operators. This study focuses on the conceded rate of return of the operators’ regulatory capital. We aim to contribute to the methodological improvement of the regulator’s approach in future tariff reviews by focusing on issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Method: We critically review ANEEL’s concept of the regulatory rate of return, stressing issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Originality/Relevance: We are not aware of any research that analyzes ANEEL’s actual model for calculating the regulatory rate of return. In line with ANEEL’s search for support, we intend that our considerations will help improve the regulator’s approach and serve as stimuli to search for answers to open questions.Results: We revealed five aspects that give rise to deeper reflections. Our findings suggest that the concept for determining the regulatory rate of return could be adapted to better reflect the Brazilian financial market conditions.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: As a main finding, the sample of US electric energy companies involved in calculating the so-called ߠfactor should be reconsidered. Furthermore, to compute the weights of these companies to calculate the sample’s unleveraged ß, companies with missing data should be excluded. Moreover, instead of gathering the data for the WACC calculation from quite different periods, these periods should be aligned on a theoretical basis.Objetivo: A ANEEL, Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, regularmente renova seu modelo tarifário para remunerar as operadoras de serviços de transmissão de energia elétrica. Como um componente da abordagem atual, estamos nos concentrando na taxa de retorno regulatória concedida às operadoras. Ao enfatizar as questões relativas ao cálculo deste índice, pretendemos contribuir para a melhoria metodológica da abordagem do regulador em futuras revisões tarifárias.Método: Revisamos criticamente o conceito da ANEEL de taxa de retorno regulatória, destacando questões relativas ao cálculo deste índice.Originalidade/Relevância: Não temos conhecimento de nenhuma pesquisa que analise o modelo atual da ANEEL para cálculo da taxa regulatória de retorno. Em linha com a busca da ANEEL por respaldo, nossa intenção é que nossas considerações ajudem a aprimorar a abordagem do regulador e sirvam de estímulo para a busca de respostas às questões em aberto.Resultados: Encontramos cinco aspectos que suscitam reflexões mais profundas. Nossas considerações sugerem que o conceito de determinação da taxa regulatória de retorno poderia ser adaptado para melhor refletir as condições do mercado financeiro brasileiro.Contribuições teóricas/metodológicas: Como principal achado, deve-se reconsiderar a amostra de empresas norte-americanas de energia elétrica envolvidas no cálculo do chamado fator ß. Além disso, para calcular os pesos dessas empresas para incorporar ao cálculo do ß desalavancado da amostra, as empresas com dados ausentes devem ser excluídas. Também foi observado que, em vez de reunir os dados para o cálculo do WACC de períodos bastante diferentes, esses períodos devem ser alinhados a uma base teórica.Contabilidade Gestão e Governança2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/265710.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n2a5Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 24 n. 2 (2021); 222-2381984-39251984-3925reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainstname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBenghttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2657/691Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governançainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimões, João José FerreiraAhn, Heinzde Souza, Antônio Artur2022-09-22T08:48:45Zoai:oai.jamg.cloud:article/2657Revistahttp://www.revistacgg.org/index.php/contabilPUBhttps://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/oaijamg.cgg@gmail.com1516-70111984-3925opendoar:2022-09-22T08:48:45Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
O Desafio para Determinar o WACC das Operadoras de Transmissão de Eletricidade: O Caso Brasileiro
title The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
spellingShingle The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
Simões, João José Ferreira
Regulation
Electricity Transmission Operator
WACC
CAPM
Rate of Return.
Regulação
Operador de Transmissão de Eletricidade
WACC
CAPM
Taxa de Retorno.
title_short The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
title_full The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
title_fullStr The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
title_full_unstemmed The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
title_sort The Challenge of Determining the WACC of Electricity Transmission Service Operators: The Brazilian Case
author Simões, João José Ferreira
author_facet Simões, João José Ferreira
Ahn, Heinz
de Souza, Antônio Artur
author_role author
author2 Ahn, Heinz
de Souza, Antônio Artur
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simões, João José Ferreira
Ahn, Heinz
de Souza, Antônio Artur
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Regulation
Electricity Transmission Operator
WACC
CAPM
Rate of Return.
Regulação
Operador de Transmissão de Eletricidade
WACC
CAPM
Taxa de Retorno.
topic Regulation
Electricity Transmission Operator
WACC
CAPM
Rate of Return.
Regulação
Operador de Transmissão de Eletricidade
WACC
CAPM
Taxa de Retorno.
description Objective: ANEEL, the Brazilian National Electric Energy Agency, regularly renews its tariff model to remunerate the electricity transmission service operators. This study focuses on the conceded rate of return of the operators’ regulatory capital. We aim to contribute to the methodological improvement of the regulator’s approach in future tariff reviews by focusing on issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Method: We critically review ANEEL’s concept of the regulatory rate of return, stressing issues concerning the calculation of this key figure.Originality/Relevance: We are not aware of any research that analyzes ANEEL’s actual model for calculating the regulatory rate of return. In line with ANEEL’s search for support, we intend that our considerations will help improve the regulator’s approach and serve as stimuli to search for answers to open questions.Results: We revealed five aspects that give rise to deeper reflections. Our findings suggest that the concept for determining the regulatory rate of return could be adapted to better reflect the Brazilian financial market conditions.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: As a main finding, the sample of US electric energy companies involved in calculating the so-called ߠfactor should be reconsidered. Furthermore, to compute the weights of these companies to calculate the sample’s unleveraged ß, companies with missing data should be excluded. Moreover, instead of gathering the data for the WACC calculation from quite different periods, these periods should be aligned on a theoretical basis.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2657
10.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n2a5
url https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2657
identifier_str_mv 10.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n2a5
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistacgg.org/index.php/contabil/article/view/2657/691
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contabilidade Gestão e Governança; v. 24 n. 2 (2021); 222-238
1984-3925
1984-3925
reponame:Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
collection Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv jamg.cgg@gmail.com
_version_ 1798315268266524672