EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Koller, Silvia Helena
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Vinas, Angela, Biaggio, Angela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144
Resumo: Kohlbergian methodology for assessment of moraljudgment has been repeatedly accused of sexism. This bias is attributed in part to the male protagonists in the assessment of moral judgment. Onthe other hand, critics of Kohlberg neglect to consider gender roles playedby the subjects in society. These variables together reveal the subjectsgender: androgynous, typified or undifferentiated. This study aims atverifying the influence of sex of protagonist of the dilemma upon moraljudgment of subjects of different sex and gender. The subjects were 180university students, 90 of each sex, 60 of each gender, between 18 and25 years of age. The materiais are: the BSRI and the MJI, in two forms:with male and female protagonist. Half answered the MJI with thesame-sex form, and the other half with the opposite-sex form. An ANOVArevealed that sex of protagonist does not produce significant differencesin levei of moral judgment among genders or between sexes. Weconclude that accusations of sex bias are not supported by these data.
id UNB-4_2245054fc43a5c8b851121e8a7aab471
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17144
network_acronym_str UNB-4
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONINGEfeitos do sexo do protagonista na avaliação de diferenças e o gênero no julgamento moralGêneroMoralidadeJulgamento moralGenderMoralityMoral judgmentKohlbergian methodology for assessment of moraljudgment has been repeatedly accused of sexism. This bias is attributed in part to the male protagonists in the assessment of moral judgment. Onthe other hand, critics of Kohlberg neglect to consider gender roles playedby the subjects in society. These variables together reveal the subjectsgender: androgynous, typified or undifferentiated. This study aims atverifying the influence of sex of protagonist of the dilemma upon moraljudgment of subjects of different sex and gender. The subjects were 180university students, 90 of each sex, 60 of each gender, between 18 and25 years of age. The materiais are: the BSRI and the MJI, in two forms:with male and female protagonist. Half answered the MJI with thesame-sex form, and the other half with the opposite-sex form. An ANOVArevealed that sex of protagonist does not produce significant differencesin levei of moral judgment among genders or between sexes. Weconclude that accusations of sex bias are not supported by these data.A metodologia kohlbergiana para avaliar o raciocínio moral foi repetidamente acusada de sexismo, porque os protagonistas dos dilemas eram homens. Essas críticas não consideram o género dos sujeitos. Este estudo verifica a influência do sexo do protagonista do dilema no julgamento moral de homens e mulheres andróginos, tipificados e indiferenciados. Foram testados 180 estudantes universitários, 90 de cada sexo, 60 de cada gênero, entre 18 e 25 anos de idade, com o BSRI e o MJI em duas formas: protagonista masculino e feminino (metade com o sexo igual ao seu e o restante diferente). Uma ANOVA revelou que o sexo do protagonistado dilema não produz diferenças significativas no julgamento moral entre os gêneros, ou entre os sexos. A falta de um efeito significativo indica que quando o raciocínio moral é avaliado pelo MJI, o sexo do protagonista não contribui para estabelecer diferenças entre os sexos ou entre os gêneros.Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília2012-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 Núm. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 8 n. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-3391806-34460102-3772reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)instacron:UNBporhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144/15453https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144/15667Koller, Silvia HelenaVinas, AngelaBiaggio, Angelainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-17T14:35:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17144Revistahttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/oairevistaptp@gmail.com1806-34460102-3772opendoar:2018-10-17T14:35:42Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
Efeitos do sexo do protagonista na avaliação de diferenças e o gênero no julgamento moral
title EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
spellingShingle EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
Koller, Silvia Helena
Gênero
Moralidade
Julgamento moral
Gender
Morality
Moral judgment
title_short EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
title_full EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
title_fullStr EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
title_sort EFFECT OF PROTAGONIST'S SEX ON ASSESSING GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MORAL REASONING
author Koller, Silvia Helena
author_facet Koller, Silvia Helena
Vinas, Angela
Biaggio, Angela
author_role author
author2 Vinas, Angela
Biaggio, Angela
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Koller, Silvia Helena
Vinas, Angela
Biaggio, Angela
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gênero
Moralidade
Julgamento moral
Gender
Morality
Moral judgment
topic Gênero
Moralidade
Julgamento moral
Gender
Morality
Moral judgment
description Kohlbergian methodology for assessment of moraljudgment has been repeatedly accused of sexism. This bias is attributed in part to the male protagonists in the assessment of moral judgment. Onthe other hand, critics of Kohlberg neglect to consider gender roles playedby the subjects in society. These variables together reveal the subjectsgender: androgynous, typified or undifferentiated. This study aims atverifying the influence of sex of protagonist of the dilemma upon moraljudgment of subjects of different sex and gender. The subjects were 180university students, 90 of each sex, 60 of each gender, between 18 and25 years of age. The materiais are: the BSRI and the MJI, in two forms:with male and female protagonist. Half answered the MJI with thesame-sex form, and the other half with the opposite-sex form. An ANOVArevealed that sex of protagonist does not produce significant differencesin levei of moral judgment among genders or between sexes. Weconclude that accusations of sex bias are not supported by these data.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144
url https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144/15453
https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17144/15667
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Psicologia - Universidade de Brasília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 Núm. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; Vol. 8 No. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339
Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa; v. 8 n. 3: Revista Psicologia: teoria e pesquisa; 327-339
1806-3446
0102-3772
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
instname:Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron:UNB
instname_str Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
instacron_str UNB
institution UNB
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade de Brasília. Online) - Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistaptp@gmail.com
_version_ 1800211710911447040

Registros relacionados