Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations made with two different glass-ionomer cements (GICs) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in permanent teeth. Material and methods: A total of 60 restorations were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two dentists using standard ART procedures. The restorations were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cavities were filled with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar-3M ESPE) and 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Two calibrated independent examiners carried out the evaluation according to ART criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using multiple logistic regression models to evaluate the variables associated with the success (GIC, operator, Class type). The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for success were based on the binomial distribution. A difference was statistically significant if p<0.05. Results:In a 3-year follow-up, 57 restorations were evaluated. In the Ketac Molar group, 3 restorations were not evaluated, 21 were considered successful and 6 unsuccessful. In the Fuji VIII group, 28 restorations were considered successful and 2 unsuccessful. The logistic regression model showed that the combination of the variables was only statistically significant in relation to survival of the ART restorations (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups taking each variable into account. The best performance included the combination: Fuji VIII, operator B and Class I involving two or more tooth surfaces. Conclusion: The clinical performance of the multiple-surface ART restorations of both materials was considered satisfactory with a high success rate after 3 years. |
id |
UNESP-20_5f81cceec6e673568925bcecb8a276b2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/872 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-upObjective: To evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations made with two different glass-ionomer cements (GICs) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in permanent teeth. Material and methods: A total of 60 restorations were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two dentists using standard ART procedures. The restorations were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cavities were filled with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar-3M ESPE) and 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Two calibrated independent examiners carried out the evaluation according to ART criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using multiple logistic regression models to evaluate the variables associated with the success (GIC, operator, Class type). The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for success were based on the binomial distribution. A difference was statistically significant if p<0.05. Results:In a 3-year follow-up, 57 restorations were evaluated. In the Ketac Molar group, 3 restorations were not evaluated, 21 were considered successful and 6 unsuccessful. In the Fuji VIII group, 28 restorations were considered successful and 2 unsuccessful. The logistic regression model showed that the combination of the variables was only statistically significant in relation to survival of the ART restorations (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups taking each variable into account. The best performance included the combination: Fuji VIII, operator B and Class I involving two or more tooth surfaces. Conclusion: The clinical performance of the multiple-surface ART restorations of both materials was considered satisfactory with a high success rate after 3 years.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2013-05-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/87210.14295/bds.2013.v16i1.872Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2013): Jan. - Mar. / 2013 - Published March 2013; 33-40Brazilian Dental Science; v. 16 n. 1 (2013): Jan. - Mar. / 2013 - Published March 2013; 33-402178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/794https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/1829https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/1830Cefaly, Daniela Francisca GigoBarata, Terezinha de Jesus EstevesBresciani, EduardoFagundes, Ticiane CestariNavarro, Maria Fidela de Limainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-28T12:37:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/872Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:29:53.088837Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
title |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
spellingShingle |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo |
title_short |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
title_full |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
title_fullStr |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
title_sort |
Clinical Evaluation of Multiple-surface ART Restorations: Three-Year Follow-up |
author |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo |
author_facet |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Bresciani, Eduardo Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Bresciani, Eduardo Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Bresciani, Eduardo Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations made with two different glass-ionomer cements (GICs) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in permanent teeth. Material and methods: A total of 60 restorations were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two dentists using standard ART procedures. The restorations were randomly divided into two groups. Thirty cavities were filled with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar-3M ESPE) and 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC (Fuji VIII-GC Corp.). Two calibrated independent examiners carried out the evaluation according to ART criteria. Data were statistically analyzed using multiple logistic regression models to evaluate the variables associated with the success (GIC, operator, Class type). The 95% confidence intervals (CI) for success were based on the binomial distribution. A difference was statistically significant if p<0.05. Results:In a 3-year follow-up, 57 restorations were evaluated. In the Ketac Molar group, 3 restorations were not evaluated, 21 were considered successful and 6 unsuccessful. In the Fuji VIII group, 28 restorations were considered successful and 2 unsuccessful. The logistic regression model showed that the combination of the variables was only statistically significant in relation to survival of the ART restorations (p=0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups taking each variable into account. The best performance included the combination: Fuji VIII, operator B and Class I involving two or more tooth surfaces. Conclusion: The clinical performance of the multiple-surface ART restorations of both materials was considered satisfactory with a high success rate after 3 years. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-05-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872 10.14295/bds.2013.v16i1.872 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14295/bds.2013.v16i1.872 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/794 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/1829 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/872/1830 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 16 No. 1 (2013): Jan. - Mar. / 2013 - Published March 2013; 33-40 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 16 n. 1 (2013): Jan. - Mar. / 2013 - Published March 2013; 33-40 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346898525978624 |