Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maciel, Andressa de Oliveira Melo
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Cruz, Silvia Regina Stuchi, Paulino, Sonia Regina
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
Download full: http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/773
Summary: The article aims to understand how REDD is shaped in Brazil analysing similarities and distinctions of REDD+ initiatives in two different financing modalities: public fund and voluntary carbon market. The analysis of different financing modalities is justified by promoting a better understanding of the structures (private and public) adopted in the design and execution of environmental economic instruments. In the Brazilian context, is also highlighted the National Strategy for REDD+ (ENREDD+), a document that formalizes the strategies adopted by the federal government for REDD+.  Data was consulted in public access databases, 129 REDD+ projects were identified and, applying the criteria status and location, 44 projects were selected. The analysis of the selected projects characteristics was based on eleven variables, based on the REDD+ literature - grouped into the categories 'project description', 'actors' and 'goals'. A small number of voluntary market projects were identified in comparison to publicly funded projects. Regarding the similarities, we can highlight the category project description - status, since few or no projects reached the period scheduled for completion of activities. In both modalities, little is demonstrated about the effective involvement of the actors, especially when it comes to local communities, an extremely relevant aspect in REDD+ discussions. Regarding the distinctions, public funds projects have greater territorial coverage (project description) and greater diversity of proponents (actors involved). Private fund projects demonstrates non-effective compliance with aspects related to Monitoring, Reporting and Verification and the delivery of co-benefits (objectives).
id UNIARA_6ad242ee63e6f651fcc64d2fa340b8eb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/773
network_acronym_str UNIARA
network_name_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository_id_str
spelling Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public fundsAnálise de iniciativas de REDD+ com financiamento de fundo público e do mercado voluntário de carbono REDD mudanças climáticasfinanciamentoThe article aims to understand how REDD is shaped in Brazil analysing similarities and distinctions of REDD+ initiatives in two different financing modalities: public fund and voluntary carbon market. The analysis of different financing modalities is justified by promoting a better understanding of the structures (private and public) adopted in the design and execution of environmental economic instruments. In the Brazilian context, is also highlighted the National Strategy for REDD+ (ENREDD+), a document that formalizes the strategies adopted by the federal government for REDD+.  Data was consulted in public access databases, 129 REDD+ projects were identified and, applying the criteria status and location, 44 projects were selected. The analysis of the selected projects characteristics was based on eleven variables, based on the REDD+ literature - grouped into the categories 'project description', 'actors' and 'goals'. A small number of voluntary market projects were identified in comparison to publicly funded projects. Regarding the similarities, we can highlight the category project description - status, since few or no projects reached the period scheduled for completion of activities. In both modalities, little is demonstrated about the effective involvement of the actors, especially when it comes to local communities, an extremely relevant aspect in REDD+ discussions. Regarding the distinctions, public funds projects have greater territorial coverage (project description) and greater diversity of proponents (actors involved). Private fund projects demonstrates non-effective compliance with aspects related to Monitoring, Reporting and Verification and the delivery of co-benefits (objectives).O trabalho objetiva entender como o REDD+ configura-se no Brasil a partir da análise de semelhanças e distinções de iniciativas de REDD+ segundo duas modalidades de financiamento: fundo público e mercado voluntário de carbono. Essa análise justifica-se para melhor compreensão das estruturas (privadas e públicas) que podem ser adotadas na concepção e execução de instrumentos econômicos ambientais. No Brasil, ressalta-se o alinhamento com a Estratégia Nacional para REDD+ (ENREDD+), documento que formaliza as estratégias adotadas pelo governo federal para a adoção de medidas de REDD+. Em consulta a bases de acesso público, foram identificados 129 projetos de REDD+ e, aplicando-se os critérios de status e localização, foram selecionados 44 projetos. A análise das características dos projetos foi feita utilizando onze variáveis, definidas com base na literatura sobre REDD+, e agrupadas nas categorias ‘descrição do projeto’, ‘atores’ e ‘objetivos’. Identificou-se número reduzido de projetos do mercado voluntário em comparação com os de financiamento público. Com relação às semelhanças, pode-se destacar a categoria descrição do projeto - status, pois poucos ou nenhum projeto atingiu o período previsto para conclusão das atividades. Em ambas as modalidades pouco é demonstrado sobre o efetivo envolvimento dos atores, em especial quando se trata das comunidades locais, aspecto extremamente relevante nas discussões do REDD+. Sobre as distinções, os de fundo público possuem maior abrangência territorial (descrição do projeto) e maior diversidade de proponentes (atores envolvidos). Dificilmente os projetos de fundo privado demonstram cumprir efetivamente os aspectos referentesRevista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM2020-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/77310.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.773Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): Maio-Agosto; 61-782527-26751415-3580reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinstname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)instacron:UNIARAporhttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/773/590Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaciel, Andressa de Oliveira MeloCruz, Silvia Regina StuchiPaulino, Sonia Regina2020-10-05T03:34:04Zoai:ojs.revistarebram.com:article/773Revistahttp://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniaraPRIhttps://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/oairevistauniara@uniara.com||2527-26752527-2675opendoar:2020-10-05T03:34:04Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
Análise de iniciativas de REDD+ com financiamento de fundo público e do mercado voluntário de carbono
title Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
spellingShingle Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
Maciel, Andressa de Oliveira Melo
REDD
mudanças climáticas
financiamento
title_short Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
title_full Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
title_fullStr Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
title_sort Analyzing REDD+ initiatives financed by market and public funds
author Maciel, Andressa de Oliveira Melo
author_facet Maciel, Andressa de Oliveira Melo
Cruz, Silvia Regina Stuchi
Paulino, Sonia Regina
author_role author
author2 Cruz, Silvia Regina Stuchi
Paulino, Sonia Regina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maciel, Andressa de Oliveira Melo
Cruz, Silvia Regina Stuchi
Paulino, Sonia Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv REDD
mudanças climáticas
financiamento
topic REDD
mudanças climáticas
financiamento
description The article aims to understand how REDD is shaped in Brazil analysing similarities and distinctions of REDD+ initiatives in two different financing modalities: public fund and voluntary carbon market. The analysis of different financing modalities is justified by promoting a better understanding of the structures (private and public) adopted in the design and execution of environmental economic instruments. In the Brazilian context, is also highlighted the National Strategy for REDD+ (ENREDD+), a document that formalizes the strategies adopted by the federal government for REDD+.  Data was consulted in public access databases, 129 REDD+ projects were identified and, applying the criteria status and location, 44 projects were selected. The analysis of the selected projects characteristics was based on eleven variables, based on the REDD+ literature - grouped into the categories 'project description', 'actors' and 'goals'. A small number of voluntary market projects were identified in comparison to publicly funded projects. Regarding the similarities, we can highlight the category project description - status, since few or no projects reached the period scheduled for completion of activities. In both modalities, little is demonstrated about the effective involvement of the actors, especially when it comes to local communities, an extremely relevant aspect in REDD+ discussions. Regarding the distinctions, public funds projects have greater territorial coverage (project description) and greater diversity of proponents (actors involved). Private fund projects demonstrates non-effective compliance with aspects related to Monitoring, Reporting and Verification and the delivery of co-benefits (objectives).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/773
10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.773
url http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/773
identifier_str_mv 10.25061/2527-2675/ReBraM/2020.v23i2.773
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistarebram.com/index.php/revistauniara/article/view/773/590
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - ReBraM; v. 23 n. 2 (2020): Maio-Agosto; 61-78
2527-2675
1415-3580
reponame:Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
instname:Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron:UNIARA
instname_str Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
instacron_str UNIARA
institution UNIARA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
collection Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira Multidisciplinar - Universidade de Araraquara (UNIARA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistauniara@uniara.com||
_version_ 1797174606788820992