The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pro-Posições (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-73072020000100529 |
Resumo: | Abstract This paper discusses the adaptation of the iPIPS assessment for use in research with Brazilian children between the ages of four and seven. It debates the importance of having a baseline measure to assess early childhood education policy as well as the advantages of collecting high-quality information about children’s development. Not knowing how children are progressing could harm disadvantaged children and increase school inequality. The data used in the analysis was based on the pre-test of the iPIPS 2016 for mathematics and language in a total of 560 cases collected in three Brazilian cities. The preliminary analyses indicate that the items of both tests present adequate behavior, suggesting the theoretical adequacy of the items and a good adaptation and application protocol. |
id |
UNICAMP-18_eace1d4b5cc15bddf41a3f3f41df4167 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-73072020000100529 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-18 |
network_name_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian contextmonitoringchildhood educationassessmentliteracyAbstract This paper discusses the adaptation of the iPIPS assessment for use in research with Brazilian children between the ages of four and seven. It debates the importance of having a baseline measure to assess early childhood education policy as well as the advantages of collecting high-quality information about children’s development. Not knowing how children are progressing could harm disadvantaged children and increase school inequality. The data used in the analysis was based on the pre-test of the iPIPS 2016 for mathematics and language in a total of 560 cases collected in three Brazilian cities. The preliminary analyses indicate that the items of both tests present adequate behavior, suggesting the theoretical adequacy of the items and a good adaptation and application protocol.UNICAMP - Faculdade de Educação2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-73072020000100529Pro-Posições v.31 2020reponame:Pro-Posições (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMP10.1590/1980-6248-2018-0036info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBartholo,Tiago LisboaKoslinski,Mariane CampeloCosta,Márcio daTymms,PeterMerrell,ChristineBarcellos,Thaís Mendonçaeng2020-08-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-73072020000100529Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ppPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||proposic@unicamp.br1980-62480103-7307opendoar:2020-08-06T00:00Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
title |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
spellingShingle |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context Bartholo,Tiago Lisboa monitoring childhood education assessment literacy |
title_short |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
title_full |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
title_fullStr |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
title_sort |
The use of cognitive instruments for research in early childhood education: constraints and possibilities in the Brazilian context |
author |
Bartholo,Tiago Lisboa |
author_facet |
Bartholo,Tiago Lisboa Koslinski,Mariane Campelo Costa,Márcio da Tymms,Peter Merrell,Christine Barcellos,Thaís Mendonça |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Koslinski,Mariane Campelo Costa,Márcio da Tymms,Peter Merrell,Christine Barcellos,Thaís Mendonça |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bartholo,Tiago Lisboa Koslinski,Mariane Campelo Costa,Márcio da Tymms,Peter Merrell,Christine Barcellos,Thaís Mendonça |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
monitoring childhood education assessment literacy |
topic |
monitoring childhood education assessment literacy |
description |
Abstract This paper discusses the adaptation of the iPIPS assessment for use in research with Brazilian children between the ages of four and seven. It debates the importance of having a baseline measure to assess early childhood education policy as well as the advantages of collecting high-quality information about children’s development. Not knowing how children are progressing could harm disadvantaged children and increase school inequality. The data used in the analysis was based on the pre-test of the iPIPS 2016 for mathematics and language in a total of 560 cases collected in three Brazilian cities. The preliminary analyses indicate that the items of both tests present adequate behavior, suggesting the theoretical adequacy of the items and a good adaptation and application protocol. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-73072020000100529 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-73072020000100529 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-6248-2018-0036 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Faculdade de Educação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNICAMP - Faculdade de Educação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições v.31 2020 reponame:Pro-Posições (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
collection |
Pro-Posições (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pro-Posições (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||proposic@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1748950195480035328 |