Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Renata
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lins, Rodrigo Barros Esteves, Rodrigues, Victória Castelan, Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite, Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes, Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657508
Resumo: Aim: Glass fiber posts are indicated in the rehabilitation of extensively damaged teeth; their cementation represents a critical step in restorative dentistry. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts cemented by conventional technique, two-step technique with luting agent and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite and luting agent. Methods: Eighty maxillary bovine incisors were endodontically treated and divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the luting agent (Rely X ARC and Duo-link) and cementation technique (conventional technique; two-step technique with luting agent; and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite – Filtek Bulk-fill flow or Surefil SDR flow – and luting agent). Samples were submitted to pushout bond strength test, and the fracture pattern was evaluated through scanning electron microscope. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: When Rely X ARC was used, the conventional cementation technique obtained higher bond strength values than the twostep technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow. When Duolink was used, the two-step technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow presented higher bond strength values than the conventional technique. The most prevalent fracture patterns were adhesive between luting agent and dentin, and adhesive between bulk-fill composite and dentin. Conclusion: Two-step cementation technique associated with bulk-fill composite may be promising depending on the luting agent used.
id UNICAMP-8_1ec4384bd8f3a4753cde1bfd6b444546
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657508
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strengthCementationComposite resinsDental cementsAim: Glass fiber posts are indicated in the rehabilitation of extensively damaged teeth; their cementation represents a critical step in restorative dentistry. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts cemented by conventional technique, two-step technique with luting agent and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite and luting agent. Methods: Eighty maxillary bovine incisors were endodontically treated and divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the luting agent (Rely X ARC and Duo-link) and cementation technique (conventional technique; two-step technique with luting agent; and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite – Filtek Bulk-fill flow or Surefil SDR flow – and luting agent). Samples were submitted to pushout bond strength test, and the fracture pattern was evaluated through scanning electron microscope. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: When Rely X ARC was used, the conventional cementation technique obtained higher bond strength values than the twostep technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow. When Duolink was used, the two-step technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow presented higher bond strength values than the conventional technique. The most prevalent fracture patterns were adhesive between luting agent and dentin, and adhesive between bulk-fill composite and dentin. Conclusion: Two-step cementation technique associated with bulk-fill composite may be promising depending on the luting agent used.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-05-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865750810.20396/bjos.v19i0.8657508Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e207508Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e2075081677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657508/22416Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, RenataLins, Rodrigo Barros Esteves Rodrigues, Victória CastelanLima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio 2021-02-08T13:06:05Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8657508Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-08T13:06:05Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
title Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
spellingShingle Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
Pereira, Renata
Cementation
Composite resins
Dental cements
title_short Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
title_full Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
title_fullStr Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
title_full_unstemmed Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
title_sort Glass fiber posts: influence of cementation techniques on push-out bond strength
author Pereira, Renata
author_facet Pereira, Renata
Lins, Rodrigo Barros Esteves
Rodrigues, Victória Castelan
Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite
Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes
Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio
author_role author
author2 Lins, Rodrigo Barros Esteves
Rodrigues, Victória Castelan
Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite
Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes
Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Renata
Lins, Rodrigo Barros Esteves
Rodrigues, Victória Castelan
Lima, Débora Alves Nunes Leite
Martins, Luís Roberto Marcondes
Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cementation
Composite resins
Dental cements
topic Cementation
Composite resins
Dental cements
description Aim: Glass fiber posts are indicated in the rehabilitation of extensively damaged teeth; their cementation represents a critical step in restorative dentistry. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts cemented by conventional technique, two-step technique with luting agent and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite and luting agent. Methods: Eighty maxillary bovine incisors were endodontically treated and divided into eight groups (n = 10) according to the luting agent (Rely X ARC and Duo-link) and cementation technique (conventional technique; two-step technique with luting agent; and two-step technique associating bulk-fill composite – Filtek Bulk-fill flow or Surefil SDR flow – and luting agent). Samples were submitted to pushout bond strength test, and the fracture pattern was evaluated through scanning electron microscope. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Results: When Rely X ARC was used, the conventional cementation technique obtained higher bond strength values than the twostep technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow. When Duolink was used, the two-step technique associated with Filtek Bulk-fill flow presented higher bond strength values than the conventional technique. The most prevalent fracture patterns were adhesive between luting agent and dentin, and adhesive between bulk-fill composite and dentin. Conclusion: Two-step cementation technique associated with bulk-fill composite may be promising depending on the luting agent used.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-05-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657508
10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8657508
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657508
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v19i0.8657508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657508/22416
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporany
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e207508
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 19 (2020): Continuous Publication; e207508
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1788167624125841408