Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8647092 |
Resumo: | Aim: To evaluate the influence of ultrasonic activation (US) with different irrigant regimens in smear layer removal. Methods: One hundred bovine incisors were instrumented and divided into ten groups (n=10) according to final irrigation protocols: distilled water (DW); DW+US; 17% EDTA; QMix; 10% citric acid; 37% phosphoric acid; 17% EDTA+US; QMix+US; 10% citric acid+US; 37% phosphoric acid+US. The samples were then submitted to scanning electron microscopy where a score system was used to evaluate the images and effectiveness of proposed treatments. The data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for intergroup comparisons as well as the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests for intragroup comparisons at 5% significance level. Results: In the cervical third, groups 17% EDTA, QMix, 10% citric acid, 17% EDTA+US, QMix+US and 10% citric acid+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the middle third, groups 17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the apical third, groups 17% EDTA,17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05). Conclusions: US can aid 17% EDTA and QMix in smear layer removal at the middle third and QMix at the apical third, contributing to the cleaning of root canal system. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_847770b0d1e0cbbff6baff8411b04957 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8647092 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removalRoot Canal Irrigants. Smear Layer. Ultrasonics.Aim: To evaluate the influence of ultrasonic activation (US) with different irrigant regimens in smear layer removal. Methods: One hundred bovine incisors were instrumented and divided into ten groups (n=10) according to final irrigation protocols: distilled water (DW); DW+US; 17% EDTA; QMix; 10% citric acid; 37% phosphoric acid; 17% EDTA+US; QMix+US; 10% citric acid+US; 37% phosphoric acid+US. The samples were then submitted to scanning electron microscopy where a score system was used to evaluate the images and effectiveness of proposed treatments. The data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for intergroup comparisons as well as the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests for intragroup comparisons at 5% significance level. Results: In the cervical third, groups 17% EDTA, QMix, 10% citric acid, 17% EDTA+US, QMix+US and 10% citric acid+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the middle third, groups 17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the apical third, groups 17% EDTA,17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05). Conclusions: US can aid 17% EDTA and QMix in smear layer removal at the middle third and QMix at the apical third, contributing to the cleaning of root canal system.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-10-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal Articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864709210.20396/bjos.v15i1.8647092Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Mar.; 16-20Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Mar.; 16-201677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8647092/14128Souza, Matheus AlbinoMotter, Felipe TrentinFontana, Tobias PitonRibeiro, Marlos BarbosaMiyagaki, Daniela CristinaCecchin, Doglasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-04-03T11:20:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8647092Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2018-04-03T11:20:35Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
title |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
spellingShingle |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal Souza, Matheus Albino Root Canal Irrigants. Smear Layer. Ultrasonics. |
title_short |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
title_full |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
title_fullStr |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
title_sort |
Influence of ultrasonic activation in association with different final irrigants on intracanal smear layer removal |
author |
Souza, Matheus Albino |
author_facet |
Souza, Matheus Albino Motter, Felipe Trentin Fontana, Tobias Piton Ribeiro, Marlos Barbosa Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina Cecchin, Doglas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Motter, Felipe Trentin Fontana, Tobias Piton Ribeiro, Marlos Barbosa Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina Cecchin, Doglas |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Matheus Albino Motter, Felipe Trentin Fontana, Tobias Piton Ribeiro, Marlos Barbosa Miyagaki, Daniela Cristina Cecchin, Doglas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Root Canal Irrigants. Smear Layer. Ultrasonics. |
topic |
Root Canal Irrigants. Smear Layer. Ultrasonics. |
description |
Aim: To evaluate the influence of ultrasonic activation (US) with different irrigant regimens in smear layer removal. Methods: One hundred bovine incisors were instrumented and divided into ten groups (n=10) according to final irrigation protocols: distilled water (DW); DW+US; 17% EDTA; QMix; 10% citric acid; 37% phosphoric acid; 17% EDTA+US; QMix+US; 10% citric acid+US; 37% phosphoric acid+US. The samples were then submitted to scanning electron microscopy where a score system was used to evaluate the images and effectiveness of proposed treatments. The data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for intergroup comparisons as well as the Wilcoxon and Friedman tests for intragroup comparisons at 5% significance level. Results: In the cervical third, groups 17% EDTA, QMix, 10% citric acid, 17% EDTA+US, QMix+US and 10% citric acid+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the middle third, groups 17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05); in the apical third, groups 17% EDTA,17% EDTA+US and QMix+US were more effective in smear layer removal (p<0.05). Conclusions: US can aid 17% EDTA and QMix in smear layer removal at the middle third and QMix at the apical third, contributing to the cleaning of root canal system. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8647092 10.20396/bjos.v15i1.8647092 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8647092 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v15i1.8647092 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8647092/14128 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 15 n. 1 (2016): Jan./Mar.; 16-20 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2016): Jan./Mar.; 16-20 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1788167622943047680 |