Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139 |
Resumo: | Aim: To compare two main methods of two-dimensional measurement of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface, testing the hypothesis that optical microscopy (OM) can reliably and efficiently scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods: Four frameworks with four titanium abutments joined with titanium bars were used. The implant-abutment interfaces were examined by three different methods, forming 3 groups: analysis by OM (40x), and analysis by SEM at 300x and 500x. Readings were taken at the mesial and distal proximal surfaces on the horizontal and vertical axes of each implant (n=32). One-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was used for statistical analysis. Results: Neither the horizontal fit nor vertical fit values of the 3 groups presented statistically significant differences (p=0.410 and p=0.543). Conclusions: OM was found to be an accurate two-dimensional method for abutment-framework or implant-abutment interface measurements, with lower costs than SEM. SEM micrographs at 500x presented technical difficulties for the readings that might produce different results. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_c7bb432287b36c653d394ddaafbf9d6e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641139 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interfaceDental implantScanning electron microscopyMethodologyOdontologiaAim: To compare two main methods of two-dimensional measurement of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface, testing the hypothesis that optical microscopy (OM) can reliably and efficiently scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods: Four frameworks with four titanium abutments joined with titanium bars were used. The implant-abutment interfaces were examined by three different methods, forming 3 groups: analysis by OM (40x), and analysis by SEM at 300x and 500x. Readings were taken at the mesial and distal proximal surfaces on the horizontal and vertical axes of each implant (n=32). One-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was used for statistical analysis. Results: Neither the horizontal fit nor vertical fit values of the 3 groups presented statistically significant differences (p=0.410 and p=0.543). Conclusions: OM was found to be an accurate two-dimensional method for abutment-framework or implant-abutment interface measurements, with lower costs than SEM. SEM micrographs at 500x presented technical difficulties for the readings that might produce different results.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 1 (2013): Jan./Mar.; 37-40Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2013): Jan./Mar.; 37-401677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139/8650Copyright (c) 2015 Karina Oliveira de Faria, Clébio Domingues da Silveira Júnior, João Paulo da Silva Neto, Maria da Glória Chiarello de Mattos, Marlete Ribeiro da Silva, Flávio Domingues das Neveshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria, Karina Oliveira deSilveira Júnior, Clébio Domingues daSilva Neto, João Paulo daMattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello deSilva, Marlete Ribeiro daNeves, Flávio Domingues das2023-09-29T12:17:51Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641139Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T12:17:51Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
title |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface Faria, Karina Oliveira de Dental implant Scanning electron microscopy Methodology Odontologia |
title_short |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
title_full |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
title_sort |
Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface |
author |
Faria, Karina Oliveira de |
author_facet |
Faria, Karina Oliveira de Silveira Júnior, Clébio Domingues da Silva Neto, João Paulo da Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello de Silva, Marlete Ribeiro da Neves, Flávio Domingues das |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silveira Júnior, Clébio Domingues da Silva Neto, João Paulo da Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello de Silva, Marlete Ribeiro da Neves, Flávio Domingues das |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria, Karina Oliveira de Silveira Júnior, Clébio Domingues da Silva Neto, João Paulo da Mattos, Maria da Glória Chiarello de Silva, Marlete Ribeiro da Neves, Flávio Domingues das |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental implant Scanning electron microscopy Methodology Odontologia |
topic |
Dental implant Scanning electron microscopy Methodology Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To compare two main methods of two-dimensional measurement of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface, testing the hypothesis that optical microscopy (OM) can reliably and efficiently scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods: Four frameworks with four titanium abutments joined with titanium bars were used. The implant-abutment interfaces were examined by three different methods, forming 3 groups: analysis by OM (40x), and analysis by SEM at 300x and 500x. Readings were taken at the mesial and distal proximal surfaces on the horizontal and vertical axes of each implant (n=32). One-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was used for statistical analysis. Results: Neither the horizontal fit nor vertical fit values of the 3 groups presented statistically significant differences (p=0.410 and p=0.543). Conclusions: OM was found to be an accurate two-dimensional method for abutment-framework or implant-abutment interface measurements, with lower costs than SEM. SEM micrographs at 500x presented technical difficulties for the readings that might produce different results. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139/8650 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 1 (2013): Jan./Mar.; 37-40 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2013): Jan./Mar.; 37-40 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216398790656000 |