Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Weber, Priscila
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues, Milanesi, Jovana M., Soares, Juliana Corrêa, Trevisan, Maria Elaine
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641399
Resumo: Aim: To investigate the correlation between the craniocervical posture measurements obtained by the biophotogrammetric and cephalometric analysis. Methods: 80 women aged between 19 and 35 years were evaluated by the cephalometric and biophotogrammetric methods. The cephalometric variables were: CVA (position of flexion/extension of the head) CPL (forward head posture) CVT/EVT ratio (cervical column curvature). For the biophotogrammetric analysis, photography were analyzed in right profile being two angles related to the head forward posture (A1 and A2) and one related to flexion-extension head position (FE). It was also measured the curvature of the cervical spine by the cervical distance. The correlation between the craniocervical posture variables, as measured by the two methods of assessment, was analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation with a significance level of 5%. Results: It was observed a moderate and significant agreement (p=0.00) between the postural craniocervical variables that analyzed the flexionextension head position (FE and CVA) and the forward head (CPL and A1). The evaluation of the cervical curvature by the DC measure showed no correlation with the cephalometric variable CVT/EVT. Conclusions: The biophotogrammetric analysis can be preferably chosen for assessing the head posture. However, the cephalometric analysis appears to be the most indicated for the cervical curvature measurement, since it enables a more objective view of the bone structures without the influence of the soft tissues.
id UNICAMP-8_f9c5578b91c27fae20492b200c295500
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641399
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysisEvaluationPostureCephalometryPhotogrammetryOdontologiaAim: To investigate the correlation between the craniocervical posture measurements obtained by the biophotogrammetric and cephalometric analysis. Methods: 80 women aged between 19 and 35 years were evaluated by the cephalometric and biophotogrammetric methods. The cephalometric variables were: CVA (position of flexion/extension of the head) CPL (forward head posture) CVT/EVT ratio (cervical column curvature). For the biophotogrammetric analysis, photography were analyzed in right profile being two angles related to the head forward posture (A1 and A2) and one related to flexion-extension head position (FE). It was also measured the curvature of the cervical spine by the cervical distance. The correlation between the craniocervical posture variables, as measured by the two methods of assessment, was analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation with a significance level of 5%. Results: It was observed a moderate and significant agreement (p=0.00) between the postural craniocervical variables that analyzed the flexionextension head position (FE and CVA) and the forward head (CPL and A1). The evaluation of the cervical curvature by the DC measure showed no correlation with the cephalometric variable CVT/EVT. Conclusions: The biophotogrammetric analysis can be preferably chosen for assessing the head posture. However, the cephalometric analysis appears to be the most indicated for the cervical curvature measurement, since it enables a more objective view of the bone structures without the influence of the soft tissues.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864139910.20396/bjos.v11i3.8641399Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 11 n. 3 (2012): Jul./Sep.; 416-421Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2012): Jul./Sep.; 416-4211677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641399/8920Weber, PriscilaCorrêa, Eliane Castilhos RodriguesMilanesi, Jovana M.Soares, Juliana CorrêaTrevisan, Maria Elaineinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:10:07Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641399Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:10:07Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
title Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
spellingShingle Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
Weber, Priscila
Evaluation
Posture
Cephalometry
Photogrammetry
Odontologia
title_short Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
title_full Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
title_fullStr Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
title_sort Craniocervical posture: cephalometric and biophotogrammetric analysis
author Weber, Priscila
author_facet Weber, Priscila
Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues
Milanesi, Jovana M.
Soares, Juliana Corrêa
Trevisan, Maria Elaine
author_role author
author2 Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues
Milanesi, Jovana M.
Soares, Juliana Corrêa
Trevisan, Maria Elaine
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Weber, Priscila
Corrêa, Eliane Castilhos Rodrigues
Milanesi, Jovana M.
Soares, Juliana Corrêa
Trevisan, Maria Elaine
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evaluation
Posture
Cephalometry
Photogrammetry
Odontologia
topic Evaluation
Posture
Cephalometry
Photogrammetry
Odontologia
description Aim: To investigate the correlation between the craniocervical posture measurements obtained by the biophotogrammetric and cephalometric analysis. Methods: 80 women aged between 19 and 35 years were evaluated by the cephalometric and biophotogrammetric methods. The cephalometric variables were: CVA (position of flexion/extension of the head) CPL (forward head posture) CVT/EVT ratio (cervical column curvature). For the biophotogrammetric analysis, photography were analyzed in right profile being two angles related to the head forward posture (A1 and A2) and one related to flexion-extension head position (FE). It was also measured the curvature of the cervical spine by the cervical distance. The correlation between the craniocervical posture variables, as measured by the two methods of assessment, was analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation with a significance level of 5%. Results: It was observed a moderate and significant agreement (p=0.00) between the postural craniocervical variables that analyzed the flexionextension head position (FE and CVA) and the forward head (CPL and A1). The evaluation of the cervical curvature by the DC measure showed no correlation with the cephalometric variable CVT/EVT. Conclusions: The biophotogrammetric analysis can be preferably chosen for assessing the head posture. However, the cephalometric analysis appears to be the most indicated for the cervical curvature measurement, since it enables a more objective view of the bone structures without the influence of the soft tissues.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641399
10.20396/bjos.v11i3.8641399
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641399
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v11i3.8641399
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641399/8920
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 11 n. 3 (2012): Jul./Sep.; 416-421
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 3 (2012): Jul./Sep.; 416-421
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216398869299200