The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fornasier, Mateus de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Silva, Fernanda Viero da, Schwede, Matheus Antes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10435
Resumo: It is a fact that society has gone through several transformations which the law must always accompany. Recently, with the advent of new technologies, in order to achieve greater procedural speed, especially in the face of such a conflicting society, the Brazilian judicial system started to adopt some tools equipped with artificial intelligence to assist in various ways, such as, for example, counting of procedural deadlines. Thus, in order to provide legal certainty for the parties and the process itself, Resolution 332 of 2020 of the National Council of Justice came to recommend ethical guidelines for the use of these tools in Brazilian law. Thus, this study focused on studying the artificial intelligence tools at work in the judiciary in the Brazilian territory, as well as the purpose of the aforementioned resolution of the CNJ and its effects. To carry out this research, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic research, using the exploratory type, with a qualitative approach.
id UNICESU-0_7e7719c64f8224ce0cfe3a235afe9681
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10435
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020El uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en el poder judicial brasileño y la Resolución 332/2020 del CNJA utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial no judiciário brasileiro e a Resolução 332/2020 do CNJArtificial IntelligenceResolution 332 of the CNJProcedural SpeedInteligencia ArtificialResolución 332 del CNJCeleridad ProcesalInteligência ArtificialResolução 332 do CNJCeleridade ProcessualDireito e TecnologiaIt is a fact that society has gone through several transformations which the law must always accompany. Recently, with the advent of new technologies, in order to achieve greater procedural speed, especially in the face of such a conflicting society, the Brazilian judicial system started to adopt some tools equipped with artificial intelligence to assist in various ways, such as, for example, counting of procedural deadlines. Thus, in order to provide legal certainty for the parties and the process itself, Resolution 332 of 2020 of the National Council of Justice came to recommend ethical guidelines for the use of these tools in Brazilian law. Thus, this study focused on studying the artificial intelligence tools at work in the judiciary in the Brazilian territory, as well as the purpose of the aforementioned resolution of the CNJ and its effects. To carry out this research, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic research, using the exploratory type, with a qualitative approach.Es un hecho que la sociedad ha atravesado varias transformaciones que la ley debe acompañar siempre. Recientemente, con el advenimiento de las nuevas tecnologías, con el fin de lograr una mayor celeridad procesal, especialmente frente a una sociedad tan conflictiva, el sistema judicial brasileño comenzó a adoptar algunas herramientas equipadas con inteligencia artificial para asistir de diversas formas, tales como, para ejemplo, recuento de plazos procesales. Así, con el fin de brindar seguridad jurídica a las partes y al propio proceso, la Resolución 332 de 2020 del Consejo Nacional de Justicia llegó a recomendar pautas éticas para el uso de estas herramientas en la legislación brasileña. Así, este estudio se centró en estudiar las herramientas de inteligencia artificial en funcionamiento en el poder judicial en el territorio brasileño, así como el propósito de la mencionada resolución del CNJ y sus efectos. Para la realización de esta investigación se utilizó el método hipotético-deductivo, con la técnica de investigación bibliográfica, utilizando el tipo exploratorio, con enfoque cualitativo.É fato que a sociedade tem passado por diversas transformações as quais o direito deve sempre acompanhar. Recentemente, com o advento das novas tecnologias, para se alcançar uma maior celeridade processual, principalmente diante de uma sociedade tão conflitante, o sistema judiciário brasileiro passou a adotar algumas ferramentas dotadas de inteligência artificial para auxiliar nas mais diversas formas, como por exemplo, a contagem de prazos processuais. Dessa forma, com o intuito de dar segurança jurídica às partes e ao processo em si, veio a Resolução 332 de 2020 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça a fim de recomendar diretrizes éticas para a utilização dessas ferramentas no jurídico brasileiro. Assim, o presente estudo se concentrou em estudar as ferramentas de inteligência artificial em funcionamento nos judiciários do território brasileiro, bem como o intuito da referida resolução do CNJ e seus efeitos. Para a realização dessa pesquisa foi utilizado o método hipotético-dedutivo, com a técnica da pesquisa bibliográfica, empregando o tipo exploratório, com abordagem qualitativa.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2023-09-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1043510.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e10435Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 23 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; 275-2882176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10435/7397Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFornasier, Mateus de OliveiraSilva, Fernanda Viero da Schwede, Matheus Antes2023-11-27T17:03:26Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10435Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2023-11-27T17:03:26Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
El uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial en el poder judicial brasileño y la Resolución 332/2020 del CNJ
A utilização de ferramentas de inteligência artificial no judiciário brasileiro e a Resolução 332/2020 do CNJ
title The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
spellingShingle The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
Fornasier, Mateus de Oliveira
Artificial Intelligence
Resolution 332 of the CNJ
Procedural Speed
Inteligencia Artificial
Resolución 332 del CNJ
Celeridad Procesal
Inteligência Artificial
Resolução 332 do CNJ
Celeridade Processual
Direito e Tecnologia
title_short The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
title_full The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
title_fullStr The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
title_full_unstemmed The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
title_sort The use of artificial intelligence tools in the brazilian judiciary and CNJ Resolution 332/2020
author Fornasier, Mateus de Oliveira
author_facet Fornasier, Mateus de Oliveira
Silva, Fernanda Viero da
Schwede, Matheus Antes
author_role author
author2 Silva, Fernanda Viero da
Schwede, Matheus Antes
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fornasier, Mateus de Oliveira
Silva, Fernanda Viero da
Schwede, Matheus Antes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Artificial Intelligence
Resolution 332 of the CNJ
Procedural Speed
Inteligencia Artificial
Resolución 332 del CNJ
Celeridad Procesal
Inteligência Artificial
Resolução 332 do CNJ
Celeridade Processual
Direito e Tecnologia
topic Artificial Intelligence
Resolution 332 of the CNJ
Procedural Speed
Inteligencia Artificial
Resolución 332 del CNJ
Celeridad Procesal
Inteligência Artificial
Resolução 332 do CNJ
Celeridade Processual
Direito e Tecnologia
description It is a fact that society has gone through several transformations which the law must always accompany. Recently, with the advent of new technologies, in order to achieve greater procedural speed, especially in the face of such a conflicting society, the Brazilian judicial system started to adopt some tools equipped with artificial intelligence to assist in various ways, such as, for example, counting of procedural deadlines. Thus, in order to provide legal certainty for the parties and the process itself, Resolution 332 of 2020 of the National Council of Justice came to recommend ethical guidelines for the use of these tools in Brazilian law. Thus, this study focused on studying the artificial intelligence tools at work in the judiciary in the Brazilian territory, as well as the purpose of the aforementioned resolution of the CNJ and its effects. To carry out this research, the hypothetical-deductive method was used, with the technique of bibliographic research, using the exploratory type, with a qualitative approach.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10435
10.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e10435
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10435
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2023v23n2.e10435
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10435/7397
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 23 n. 2 (2023): maio/ago.; 275-288
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042384810901504

Registros relacionados