Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lombardi , Lia Cocicov
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lehfeld, Lucas de Souza, Perez Filho, Augusto Martinez
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10827
Resumo: The Brazilian Judicial Authorities are facing litigiousness and demands for the prevention of conflicts. Current paper investigates juridical activism in Brazil which scorns at juridical security and the predictability of jurisdiction. It verifies the duty of the magistrate and juridical organs to guarantee juridical security and credibility in its decisions in the wake of signs of activism in the Brazilian jurisdictional exercise. Specific aims comprise the activist behavior in decision taking frequently based on the conveniences of the moment and ideologies of the applier of the Law, cultural filters that corroborate towards the depreciation of the juridical decision and the acceptance of juridical activism in Brazil. Methodology comprises deduction, bibliographical review of articles and doctrine, coupled to the jurisdictional analysis of the theme. The preeminence of the guarantee for juridical security is upheld for the prevention of conflicts and the (limited) feasibility of juridical activism in the Brazilian juridical system.
id UNICESU-0_87a5b77609ba4b1bcac646ae373c0d5c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10827
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of ConflictsLa Seguridad Jurídica como Medio de Prestigio a las Decisiones y Prevención de ConflictoA Segurança Jurídica como meio de Prestígio às Decisões e Prevenção de ConflitoCultureIdeologyJudicial activismJudicial securityPrevention of conflictsActivismo judicialCulturaIdeologíaPrevención de conflictosSeguridad jurídicaAtivismo judicialCulturaIdeologiaPrevenção de conflitosSegurança jurídicaGestão de conflitosThe Brazilian Judicial Authorities are facing litigiousness and demands for the prevention of conflicts. Current paper investigates juridical activism in Brazil which scorns at juridical security and the predictability of jurisdiction. It verifies the duty of the magistrate and juridical organs to guarantee juridical security and credibility in its decisions in the wake of signs of activism in the Brazilian jurisdictional exercise. Specific aims comprise the activist behavior in decision taking frequently based on the conveniences of the moment and ideologies of the applier of the Law, cultural filters that corroborate towards the depreciation of the juridical decision and the acceptance of juridical activism in Brazil. Methodology comprises deduction, bibliographical review of articles and doctrine, coupled to the jurisdictional analysis of the theme. The preeminence of the guarantee for juridical security is upheld for the prevention of conflicts and the (limited) feasibility of juridical activism in the Brazilian juridical system. El Poder Judiciario brasileño enfrenta expresiva litigiosidad y clama por la prevención de conflictos. En el presente artículo se pretende examinar el activismo judicial en Brasil, que desprestigia la seguranza jurídica y la previsibilidad del justiciado. Se tiene por objetivo general verificar el deber del magistrado y de los órganos judiciales de garantizar seguranza jurídica y credibilidad de sus decisiones, debido a las consideraciones de activismo en el ejercicio jurisdiccional brasileño. Los objetivos específicos son el análisis de la conducta activista en la toma de decisión, que por veces se fundamenta en conveniencias del momento y en ideologías del aplicador del Derecho, así como de los factores culturales que corroboran para el desprestigio de la decisión judicial y del activismo judicial en Brasil. En el presente artículo se utilizó el método deductivo de investigación y revisión bibliográfica de artículos y de doctrina. Fue también objeto de estudio jurisprudencia acerca del tema. En ese contexto, se pretende demostrar la urgencia de garantía de la seguridad jurídica como modo de prevención de conflictos y la viabilidad (limitada) del activismo judicial en el sistema judiciario patrio. O Poder Judiciário brasileiro enfrenta expressiva litigiosidade e clama pela prevenção de conflitos. O presente artigo pretende examinar o ativismo judicial no Brasil, que desprestigia a segurança jurídica e a previsibilidade do jurisdicionado. Tem-se por objetivo geral verificar o dever do magistrado e dos órgãos judiciais de garantir segurança jurídica e credibilidade de suas decisões, em face dos acenos de ativismo no exercício jurisdicional brasileiro. Os objetivos específicos são a análise da conduta ativista na tomada de decisão, que por vezes se fundamenta em conveniências do momento e em ideologias do aplicador do Direito, bem como dos fatores culturais que corroboram para o desprestígio da decisão judicial e do cabimento do ativismo judicial no Brasil. O presente artigo utilizou o método dedutivo de pesquisa e revisão bibliográfica de artigos e de doutrina. Foi também objeto de estudo jurisprudência acerca do tema. Nesse contexto, pretende-se demonstrar a premência de garantia da segurança jurídica como modo de prevenção de conflitos e a viabilidade (limitada) do ativismo judicial no sistema judiciário pátrio. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-04-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Parestextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1082710.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n1.e10827Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 1 (2022): jan./abr. ; 189-2012176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10827/7073Lombardi , Lia CocicovLehfeld, Lucas de Souza Perez Filho, Augusto Martinezinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-04T18:42:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10827Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-08-04T18:42:51Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
La Seguridad Jurídica como Medio de Prestigio a las Decisiones y Prevención de Conflicto
A Segurança Jurídica como meio de Prestígio às Decisões e Prevenção de Conflito
title Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
spellingShingle Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
Lombardi , Lia Cocicov
Culture
Ideology
Judicial activism
Judicial security
Prevention of conflicts
Activismo judicial
Cultura
Ideología
Prevención de conflictos
Seguridad jurídica
Ativismo judicial
Cultura
Ideologia
Prevenção de conflitos
Segurança jurídica
Gestão de conflitos
title_short Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
title_full Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
title_fullStr Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
title_sort Judicial Security as a Means for the Upholding of Decisions and Prevention of Conflicts
author Lombardi , Lia Cocicov
author_facet Lombardi , Lia Cocicov
Lehfeld, Lucas de Souza
Perez Filho, Augusto Martinez
author_role author
author2 Lehfeld, Lucas de Souza
Perez Filho, Augusto Martinez
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lombardi , Lia Cocicov
Lehfeld, Lucas de Souza
Perez Filho, Augusto Martinez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Culture
Ideology
Judicial activism
Judicial security
Prevention of conflicts
Activismo judicial
Cultura
Ideología
Prevención de conflictos
Seguridad jurídica
Ativismo judicial
Cultura
Ideologia
Prevenção de conflitos
Segurança jurídica
Gestão de conflitos
topic Culture
Ideology
Judicial activism
Judicial security
Prevention of conflicts
Activismo judicial
Cultura
Ideología
Prevención de conflictos
Seguridad jurídica
Ativismo judicial
Cultura
Ideologia
Prevenção de conflitos
Segurança jurídica
Gestão de conflitos
description The Brazilian Judicial Authorities are facing litigiousness and demands for the prevention of conflicts. Current paper investigates juridical activism in Brazil which scorns at juridical security and the predictability of jurisdiction. It verifies the duty of the magistrate and juridical organs to guarantee juridical security and credibility in its decisions in the wake of signs of activism in the Brazilian jurisdictional exercise. Specific aims comprise the activist behavior in decision taking frequently based on the conveniences of the moment and ideologies of the applier of the Law, cultural filters that corroborate towards the depreciation of the juridical decision and the acceptance of juridical activism in Brazil. Methodology comprises deduction, bibliographical review of articles and doctrine, coupled to the jurisdictional analysis of the theme. The preeminence of the guarantee for juridical security is upheld for the prevention of conflicts and the (limited) feasibility of juridical activism in the Brazilian juridical system.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10827
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n1.e10827
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10827
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n1.e10827
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/10827/7073
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 1 (2022): jan./abr. ; 189-201
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042388772421632

Registros relacionados