The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517 |
Resumo: | The application of logical deduction theory may invalidate Darwin’s theory and the theories derived from it, including Karl Popper’s theory of the evolution of science. When Evolutionism is discarded as an uncontested premise, a break in the paradigms occurs in Law. The latter should re-think the anthropological concept of the application of fundamental right to life exclusively to humans. |
id |
UNICESU-0_d59ecf24531fe38725811e1ad1408186 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2517 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living BeingsUma Análise da Relação entre a Teoria da Evolução Científica de Popper, a Teoria Evolucionista de Darwin, e uma Reflexão sobre o Direito à Vida dos demais Seres VivosTheory of EvolutionAnthropocentrismEcocentrismTeoria da EvoluçãoAntropocentrismoEcocentrismoThe application of logical deduction theory may invalidate Darwin’s theory and the theories derived from it, including Karl Popper’s theory of the evolution of science. When Evolutionism is discarded as an uncontested premise, a break in the paradigms occurs in Law. The latter should re-think the anthropological concept of the application of fundamental right to life exclusively to humans.Aplicando a teoria da lógica dedutiva, algumas análises podem invalidar a teoria de Darwin, e de conseguinte as teorias nesta fundamentadas, inclusive a teoria da evolução da ciência de Karl Popper. Ao afastar o evolucionismo como uma premissa inconteste, impõe-se uma quebra de paradigmas no Direito, que deve repensar a concepção antropocêntrica da aplicação do direito fundamental à vida apenas aos seres humanos.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2012-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesRevisão de literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez.2176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517/1763Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, Marta de OliveiraSilva, Mônica Neves Aguiar da2022-05-24T12:51:12Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2517Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-05-24T12:51:12Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings Uma Análise da Relação entre a Teoria da Evolução Científica de Popper, a Teoria Evolucionista de Darwin, e uma Reflexão sobre o Direito à Vida dos demais Seres Vivos |
title |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
spellingShingle |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings Torres, Marta de Oliveira Theory of Evolution Anthropocentrism Ecocentrism Teoria da Evolução Antropocentrismo Ecocentrismo |
title_short |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
title_full |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
title_fullStr |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
title_sort |
The Relationship Between Popper’s Scientific Evolution Theory, Darwin’s Evolutionist Theory and a Discussion on the Right to life of Other Living Beings |
author |
Torres, Marta de Oliveira |
author_facet |
Torres, Marta de Oliveira Silva, Mônica Neves Aguiar da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Mônica Neves Aguiar da |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Torres, Marta de Oliveira Silva, Mônica Neves Aguiar da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Theory of Evolution Anthropocentrism Ecocentrism Teoria da Evolução Antropocentrismo Ecocentrismo |
topic |
Theory of Evolution Anthropocentrism Ecocentrism Teoria da Evolução Antropocentrismo Ecocentrismo |
description |
The application of logical deduction theory may invalidate Darwin’s theory and the theories derived from it, including Karl Popper’s theory of the evolution of science. When Evolutionism is discarded as an uncontested premise, a break in the paradigms occurs in Law. The latter should re-think the anthropological concept of the application of fundamental right to life exclusively to humans. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares Revisão de literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/2517/1763 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 12 n. 2 (2012): jul./dez. 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1754650134830907392 |