Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lino, Vitor Abel da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bezerra Neto, Francisco, Chaves, Aridênia Peixoto, Lima, Jailma Suerda Silva de, Santos, Elizangela Cabral dos, Nunes, Renato Leandro da Costa, Guerra, Natan Medeiros, Lino, Francisca Karla Kelly da Silva, Sá, Jolinda Mércia de, Porto, Vania Christina do Nascimento, Desravines , Rose Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17112
Resumo: The triumph of the crops association with vegetables in semi-arid environment depends on crop types grown and adequate manipulation of treatment-factors tested such as fertilization, plant population, among others. Thus, this investigation aimed to valuate the bio-economic return of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in diverse balanced quantities of hairy woodrose (M. aegyptia) and roostertree (C. procera) biomass (20, 35, 50 and 65 t ha-1 on base dry) and in different rocket plant population (40, 60, 80 and 100% of that recommended population in monocropping - RPM), associated with the beet population of 100% of the RPM, in two years of cultivation. The bio-economic indices: land equivalent ratio (LER), intercropping advantage (IA), actual yield loss (AYL), productive efficiency index (PEI), canonical variable score (Z), gross return (GR) and net return (NR), rate of return (RR) and profit margin (PM) were assessed. The greatest bio-economic returns of beet-rocket strip-intercropping were of: 1.87; 7.44; 1.90; 0.98; 2.52; 85,827.79 and 65,425.01 R$ ha-1; 4.24 R$ for each real invested, and 77.02%, respectively, for LER, IA, AYL, PEI, Z, GR, NR, RR and PM in the biomass quantity of 65 t ha-1 of hairy woodrose and roostertree, in the rocket population of 100% of the RPM (a million plants ha-1). The hairy woodrose and roostertree biomass use from Caatinga biome proved to be a viable technology for growers who practice the cultivation of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in semi-arid environment.
id UNIFEI_01c625c17dc698342a334df0b4b0d90b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17112
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket Retorno bioeconómico de la fertilización verde y la población de plantas de cultivo intercalado em uma franja de remolacha y rúgulaRetorno bio-econômico proveniente de fertilização verde e população de plantas em consórcio em faixa de beterraba e rúculaHairy woodroseRoostertreeCrop associationAgronomic plausibleness.CampanillaAlgodón de sedaCultivos intercaladosViabilidad agronómica.JitiranaFlor-de-sedaConsorciação de culturasViabilidade agronômica.The triumph of the crops association with vegetables in semi-arid environment depends on crop types grown and adequate manipulation of treatment-factors tested such as fertilization, plant population, among others. Thus, this investigation aimed to valuate the bio-economic return of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in diverse balanced quantities of hairy woodrose (M. aegyptia) and roostertree (C. procera) biomass (20, 35, 50 and 65 t ha-1 on base dry) and in different rocket plant population (40, 60, 80 and 100% of that recommended population in monocropping - RPM), associated with the beet population of 100% of the RPM, in two years of cultivation. The bio-economic indices: land equivalent ratio (LER), intercropping advantage (IA), actual yield loss (AYL), productive efficiency index (PEI), canonical variable score (Z), gross return (GR) and net return (NR), rate of return (RR) and profit margin (PM) were assessed. The greatest bio-economic returns of beet-rocket strip-intercropping were of: 1.87; 7.44; 1.90; 0.98; 2.52; 85,827.79 and 65,425.01 R$ ha-1; 4.24 R$ for each real invested, and 77.02%, respectively, for LER, IA, AYL, PEI, Z, GR, NR, RR and PM in the biomass quantity of 65 t ha-1 of hairy woodrose and roostertree, in the rocket population of 100% of the RPM (a million plants ha-1). The hairy woodrose and roostertree biomass use from Caatinga biome proved to be a viable technology for growers who practice the cultivation of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in semi-arid environment.El éxito de la asociación de cultivos con hortalizas en ambiente semiárido depende del tipo de cultivos que se cultiven y del manejo adecuado de los factores de tratamiento probados, como fertilización, población de plantas, entre otros. Así, el objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el retorno bioeconómico del cultivo intercalado en franjas de remolacha y rúgula en diferentes cantidades equilibradas de biomasa de campanilla (M. aegyptia) y algodón de seda (C. procera) (20, 35, 50 y 65 t ha-1 en base seca) y en diferentes poblaciones de rúgula (40, 60, 80 y 100% de la población de monocultivo recomendada - PMR), asociada a una población de remolacha del 100% de la PMR, en dos años de cultivo. Los índices bioeconómicos: razón equivalente de tierra (RET), ventaja del consorcio (VC), pérdida de rendimiento real (PRR), índice de eficiencia productiva (IEP), puntuación de variable canónica (Z), rendimiento bruto (RB) y rendimiento neto (RN), tasa de rendimiento (TR) y el margen de beneficio (MB). Los mayores rendimientos bioeconómicos del cultivo intercalado de remolacha y rúgula fueron: 1,87; 7,44; 1,90; 0,98; 2,52; 85.827,79 y 65.425,01 R$ ha-1; R$ 4.24 por cada real invertido y 77.02%, respectivamente, para RET, VC, PRR, IEP, Z, RB, RN, TR y MB en la cantidad balanceada de biomasa de 65 t ha-1 de campanilla y algodón de seda, en la población de rúgula del 100% del PMR (un millón de plantas ha-1). El uso de biomasa de campanilla y algodón de seda del bioma de Caatinga demostró ser una tecnología viable para los productores que practican el cultivo de remolacha y rúgula intercalados en franjas en ambiente semiárido.O êxito da associação de culturas com hortaliças em ambiente semiárido depende do tipo de culturas cultivadas e da manipulação adequada dos fatores tratamentos testados, tais como, fertilização, população de plantas, entre outros. Assim, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o retorno bio-econômico do consórcio em faixas de beterraba e rúcula em diversas quantidades balanceadas de biomassa de jitirana (M. aegyptia) e flor-de-seda (C. procera) (20, 35, 50 e 65 t ha-1 em base seca) e em diferentes populações de rúcula (40, 60, 80 e 100% da população recomendada em monocultura - PRM), associada à população de beterraba de 100% da PRM, em dois anos de cultivos. Os índices bio-econômicos: razão equivalente de terra (RET), vantagem do consórcio (VC), perda real de rendimento (PRR), índice de eficiência produtiva (IEP), escore da variável canônica (Z), retorno bruto (RB) e retorno líquido (RL), taxa de retorno (TR) e margem de lucro (ML) foram avaliados. Os maiores retornos bio-econômicos do consórcio em faixas de beterraba e rúcula foram de: 1,87; 7,44; 1,90; 0,98; 2,52; 85.827,79 e 65.425,01 R$ ha-1; R$ 4,24 para cada real investido e 77,02%, respectivamente, para RET, VC, PRR, IEP, Z, RB, RL, TR e ML na quantidade balanceada de biomassa de 65 t ha-1 de jitirana e flor-de-seda, na população de rúcula de 100% da PRM (um milhão de plantas ha-1). A utilização da biomassa de jitirana e flor-de-seda do bioma Caatinga mostrou-se uma tecnologia viável para os produtores que praticam o cultivo da beterraba e de rúcula em consórcio em faixas em ambiente semiárido.Research, Society and Development2021-07-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1711210.33448/rsd-v10i8.17112Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e20910817112Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e20910817112Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e209108171122525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIenghttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17112/15401Copyright (c) 2021 Vitor Abel da Silva Lino; Francisco Bezerra Neto; Aridênia Peixoto Chaves; Jailma Suerda Silva de Lima; Elizangela Cabral dos Santos; Renato Leandro da Costa Nunes; Natan Medeiros Guerra; Francisca Karla Kelly da Silva Lino; Jolinda Mércia de Sá; Vania Christina do Nascimento Porto; Rose Paula Desravines https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLino, Vitor Abel da SilvaBezerra Neto, Francisco Chaves, Aridênia PeixotoLima, Jailma Suerda Silva deSantos, Elizangela Cabral dos Nunes, Renato Leandro da Costa Guerra, Natan MedeirosLino, Francisca Karla Kelly da SilvaSá, Jolinda Mércia de Porto, Vania Christina do Nascimento Desravines , Rose Paula 2021-08-21T18:46:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/17112Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:37:30.950477Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
Retorno bioeconómico de la fertilización verde y la población de plantas de cultivo intercalado em uma franja de remolacha y rúgula
Retorno bio-econômico proveniente de fertilização verde e população de plantas em consórcio em faixa de beterraba e rúcula
title Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
spellingShingle Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
Lino, Vitor Abel da Silva
Hairy woodrose
Roostertree
Crop association
Agronomic plausibleness.
Campanilla
Algodón de seda
Cultivos intercalados
Viabilidad agronómica.
Jitirana
Flor-de-seda
Consorciação de culturas
Viabilidade agronômica.
title_short Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
title_full Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
title_fullStr Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
title_full_unstemmed Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
title_sort Bio-economic return from the green fertilizing and plant population in strip-intercropping of beet and rocket
author Lino, Vitor Abel da Silva
author_facet Lino, Vitor Abel da Silva
Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Chaves, Aridênia Peixoto
Lima, Jailma Suerda Silva de
Santos, Elizangela Cabral dos
Nunes, Renato Leandro da Costa
Guerra, Natan Medeiros
Lino, Francisca Karla Kelly da Silva
Sá, Jolinda Mércia de
Porto, Vania Christina do Nascimento
Desravines , Rose Paula
author_role author
author2 Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Chaves, Aridênia Peixoto
Lima, Jailma Suerda Silva de
Santos, Elizangela Cabral dos
Nunes, Renato Leandro da Costa
Guerra, Natan Medeiros
Lino, Francisca Karla Kelly da Silva
Sá, Jolinda Mércia de
Porto, Vania Christina do Nascimento
Desravines , Rose Paula
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lino, Vitor Abel da Silva
Bezerra Neto, Francisco
Chaves, Aridênia Peixoto
Lima, Jailma Suerda Silva de
Santos, Elizangela Cabral dos
Nunes, Renato Leandro da Costa
Guerra, Natan Medeiros
Lino, Francisca Karla Kelly da Silva
Sá, Jolinda Mércia de
Porto, Vania Christina do Nascimento
Desravines , Rose Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hairy woodrose
Roostertree
Crop association
Agronomic plausibleness.
Campanilla
Algodón de seda
Cultivos intercalados
Viabilidad agronómica.
Jitirana
Flor-de-seda
Consorciação de culturas
Viabilidade agronômica.
topic Hairy woodrose
Roostertree
Crop association
Agronomic plausibleness.
Campanilla
Algodón de seda
Cultivos intercalados
Viabilidad agronómica.
Jitirana
Flor-de-seda
Consorciação de culturas
Viabilidade agronômica.
description The triumph of the crops association with vegetables in semi-arid environment depends on crop types grown and adequate manipulation of treatment-factors tested such as fertilization, plant population, among others. Thus, this investigation aimed to valuate the bio-economic return of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in diverse balanced quantities of hairy woodrose (M. aegyptia) and roostertree (C. procera) biomass (20, 35, 50 and 65 t ha-1 on base dry) and in different rocket plant population (40, 60, 80 and 100% of that recommended population in monocropping - RPM), associated with the beet population of 100% of the RPM, in two years of cultivation. The bio-economic indices: land equivalent ratio (LER), intercropping advantage (IA), actual yield loss (AYL), productive efficiency index (PEI), canonical variable score (Z), gross return (GR) and net return (NR), rate of return (RR) and profit margin (PM) were assessed. The greatest bio-economic returns of beet-rocket strip-intercropping were of: 1.87; 7.44; 1.90; 0.98; 2.52; 85,827.79 and 65,425.01 R$ ha-1; 4.24 R$ for each real invested, and 77.02%, respectively, for LER, IA, AYL, PEI, Z, GR, NR, RR and PM in the biomass quantity of 65 t ha-1 of hairy woodrose and roostertree, in the rocket population of 100% of the RPM (a million plants ha-1). The hairy woodrose and roostertree biomass use from Caatinga biome proved to be a viable technology for growers who practice the cultivation of beet-rocket strip-intercropping in semi-arid environment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17112
10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17112
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17112
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17112
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/17112/15401
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 8; e20910817112
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 8; e20910817112
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 8; e20910817112
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052681623175168