Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Hahn, Ivanete Schneider
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169
Resumo: This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities.
id UNIFEI_11ea82eb0d3d4831bc68f3843145a83b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29169
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution systemDiscusión mediática y opinión pública: reflexiones en el sistema brasileño de persecución criminalDiscussão midiática e a opinião pública: reflexos no sistema de persecução penal BrasileiroPersecución CriminalLibertad de expresiónOpinión públicaMediaEnseñanza.Persecução PenalLiberdade de expressãoMídiaOpinião PúblicaEnsino.Criminal PersecutionFreedom of speechMediaPublic opinionTeaching.This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities.Este artículo analizó la injerencia de la opinión pública cuando se toma una decisión administrativa o judicial, en el ámbito de la persecución penal brasileña. Utilizamos como estrategia el estudio de casos, recolectando datos a través de la investigación documental. Se seleccionaron y analizaron tres juicios de gran repercusión mediática, así: Caso TJSP N° 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, denominado Caso Escola de Base; Caso TJSC - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, denominado Caso Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; y Proceso TJRJ – nº 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, denominado Caso Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos. Para el análisis de los casos, se expusieron los fundamentos jurídicos de cada uno de ellos, basados ​​en la legislación, la doctrina y la jurisprudencia brasileña. Los resultados permiten concluir que la toma de decisiones procesales de ambos os casos estuvo marcada por la influencia externa proveniente de la opinión pública generada y fomentada por los Medios de Comunicación, lo que repercutió en la persecución penal de los casos. Se concluye que los medios de comunicación no solo influyen en la población en general, sino que las agencias de medios terminan interfiriendo en la realización de actividades exclusivas del Estado.O artigo analisou a interferência da discussão midiática e da opinião pública quando da prolação de uma decisão administrativa ou judicial, no âmbito da persecução penal brasileira. Foi utilizada como estratégia de pesquisa estudos de caso, sendo as informações levantadas por meio de pesquisa documental. Três processos judiciais de grande repercussão midiática foram selecionados e analisados, sendo: Processo TJSP n.º 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, denominado Caso Escola Base; Processo TJSC – n.º 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, nominado como Caso Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; e Processo TJRJ – n.º 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referido como Caso Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos. Para analisar os casos, foram expostas as bases jurídicas concernentes a cada um deles, pautando-se na legislação, doutrina e jurisprudência pátria. Os resultados permitem concluir que os atos processuais decisórios dos casos foram marcados pela influência externa advinda da opinião pública gerada e fomentada pelos Mass Media, tendo impactado na persecução criminal dos casos. Conclui-se que a mídia não influencia apenas a população em geral, e sim, agências midiáticas acabam por interferir na consecução de atividades exclusivas de Estado.Research, Society and Development2022-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2916910.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35211629169Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35211629169Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e352116291692525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169/25285Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahnhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColaço, Marcelo RicardoHahn, Ivanete Schneider 2022-05-13T18:04:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/29169Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:46:19.185005Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
Discusión mediática y opinión pública: reflexiones en el sistema brasileño de persecución criminal
Discussão midiática e a opinião pública: reflexos no sistema de persecução penal Brasileiro
title Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
spellingShingle Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo
Persecución Criminal
Libertad de expresión
Opinión pública
Media
Enseñanza.
Persecução Penal
Liberdade de expressão
Mídia
Opinião Pública
Ensino.
Criminal Persecution
Freedom of speech
Media
Public opinion
Teaching.
title_short Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
title_full Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
title_fullStr Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
title_full_unstemmed Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
title_sort Media discussion and public opinion: reflections in the Brazilian criminal persecution system
author Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo
author_facet Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo
Hahn, Ivanete Schneider
author_role author
author2 Hahn, Ivanete Schneider
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colaço, Marcelo Ricardo
Hahn, Ivanete Schneider
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Persecución Criminal
Libertad de expresión
Opinión pública
Media
Enseñanza.
Persecução Penal
Liberdade de expressão
Mídia
Opinião Pública
Ensino.
Criminal Persecution
Freedom of speech
Media
Public opinion
Teaching.
topic Persecución Criminal
Libertad de expresión
Opinión pública
Media
Enseñanza.
Persecução Penal
Liberdade de expressão
Mídia
Opinião Pública
Ensino.
Criminal Persecution
Freedom of speech
Media
Public opinion
Teaching.
description This article analyzed the interference of public opinion when an administrative or judicial decision is made, within the scope of Brazilian criminal prosecution. We used case studies as a strategy, collecting data through documentary research. Three cases with great media repercussion were selected and analyzed, being: TJSP Case No. 0002554-94.2003.8.26.0100, called Caso Escola de Base; TJSC Case - No. 0000568-40.2019.8.24.0023, named as Case Elian Lucas Ferreira Dias; and TJRJ Process – no. 0012515-98.2019.8.19.0001, referred to as Leonardo do Nascimento dos Santos Case. To analyze the cases, the legal bases concerning each one was exposed, based on the legislation, doctrine, and Brazilian jurisprudence. The results allow us to conclude that the procedural decision-making of both cases analyzed was marked by the external influence arising from the public opinion generated and fostered by the Mass Media, which had an impact on the criminal prosecution of the cases. It is concluded that the media does not only influence the population in general once that media agencies end up interfering in the achievement of exclusive State activities.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169
10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i6.29169
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/29169/25285
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahn
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Marcelo Ricardo Colaço; Ivanete Schneider Hahn
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 6; e35211629169
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 6; e35211629169
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 6; e35211629169
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052711444676608

Registros relacionados