Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Larissa Costa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Flávia Braga de, Lima, Camila Moreira, Miranda , Jean Soares, Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625
Resumo: Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost.
id UNIFEI_3a79751654bf3be139a672be1263a2f5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25625
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic reviewTecnología digital versus tecnología convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales: una revisión sistemáticaTecnologia digital versus convencional para confecção de próteses totais: uma revisão sistemáticaCAD-CAMDentadura totalVentaja.CAD-CAMComplete dentureAdvantage.CAD-CAMPrótese totalVantagem.Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost.Objetivo: Evaluar si la tecnología CAD / CAM es superior a la técnica convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales con soporte de moco. Metodología: Esta revisión siguió las recomendaciones de PRISMA. Dos revisores calibrados realizaron una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science y Cochrane Library, utilizando los descriptores: “Dentadura completa”, “Dentadura completa”, “Dentadura total”, “Prótesis total”, “Prótesis completa”, “Prótesis completa”, “Prótesis total”, “Prótesis total”, “Diseño asistido por computadora”, “Fabricación asistida por computadora”, “CAD / CAM”, “Beneficios” y “Ventaja”. Solo se incluyeron los estudios in vitro que comparaban la tecnología CAD / CAM (impresión o fresado) con la fabricación convencional, y se excluyeron los estudios sin grupo control y prótesis sobre implantes. Resultados: La estrategia utilizada resultó en 410 artículos. De estos, 11 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Después de la lectura completa, solo se incluyeron 6 en la revisión sistemática. A pesar de requerir una alta inversión y formación profesional, los estudios seleccionados demostraron las siguientes ventajas del sistema CAD / CAM sobre el convencional: menor liberación de monómero y mejor adaptación de las prótesis Conclusión: El proceso de fabricación de prótesis totales mediante el sistema CAD / La CAM demostró ser ventajosa en comparación con el método convencional, siendo la principal la menor liberación de monómero, acompañada de mejores cualidades biomecánicas y adaptación marginal, a pesar de su elevado coste.Objetivo: Avaliar se a tecnologia CAD/CAM é superior a técnica convencional para confecção de próteses totais mucosuportadas. Metodologia: Esta revisão seguiu as recomendações do PRISMA. Foi realizada, por dois revisores calibrados, uma revisão sistemática nas bases de dados Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science e Cochrane Library, usando os descritores: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prostheses”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prostheses”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ‘’Benefits” e “Advantage”. Foram incluídos apenas estudos in vitro que comparavam a tecnologia CAD/CAM (impressão ou fresagem) com a confecção convenvional e excluídos trabalhos sem grupo controle e de próteses sobre implantes. Resultados: A estratégia utilizada resultou em 410 artigos. Destes, 11 se encaixavam nos critérios de inclusão. Após leitura na íntegra, apenas 6 foram incluídos na revisão sistemática. Apesar de exigir um alto investimento e capacitação profissional, os estudos selecionados demonstraram as próteses Conclusão: O processo de fabricação de prótese total por meio do sistema CAD/CAM apresentou-se vantajoso, comparado ao método convencional, sendo a principal delas a menor liberação de monômero, acompanhado de melhores qualidades biomecânicas e adaptação marginal, apesar do seu alto custo.Research, Society and Development2022-01-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2562510.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e24911225625Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e24911225625Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e249112256252525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625/22512Copyright (c) 2022 Larissa Costa Freitas; Flávia Braga de Oliveira; Camila Moreira Lima; Jean Soares Miranda ; Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leitehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Larissa Costa Oliveira, Flávia Braga de Lima, Camila MoreiraMiranda , Jean SoaresLeite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira2022-02-07T01:42:50Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/25625Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:43:52.033684Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
Tecnología digital versus tecnología convencional para hacer dentaduras postizas totales: una revisión sistemática
Tecnologia digital versus convencional para confecção de próteses totais: uma revisão sistemática
title Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
spellingShingle Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
Freitas, Larissa Costa
CAD-CAM
Dentadura total
Ventaja.
CAD-CAM
Complete denture
Advantage.
CAD-CAM
Prótese total
Vantagem.
title_short Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
title_full Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
title_fullStr Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
title_sort Digital versus conventional technology for making Complete Denture: a systematic review
author Freitas, Larissa Costa
author_facet Freitas, Larissa Costa
Oliveira, Flávia Braga de
Lima, Camila Moreira
Miranda , Jean Soares
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Flávia Braga de
Lima, Camila Moreira
Miranda , Jean Soares
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Larissa Costa
Oliveira, Flávia Braga de
Lima, Camila Moreira
Miranda , Jean Soares
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CAD-CAM
Dentadura total
Ventaja.
CAD-CAM
Complete denture
Advantage.
CAD-CAM
Prótese total
Vantagem.
topic CAD-CAM
Dentadura total
Ventaja.
CAD-CAM
Complete denture
Advantage.
CAD-CAM
Prótese total
Vantagem.
description Objective: To assess whether the CAD/CAM technology is superior to the conventional technique for making Tissue Born total dentures. Methodology: This review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A systematic review was carried out by two calibrated reviewers in the Medline-PubMed, Scopus, Scielo, Lilacs, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases, using the descriptors: “Complete denture”, “Complete dentures”, “Total denture”, “Total dentures”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Complete prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Total prosthesis”, “Computer Aided Design”, “Computer Aided Manufacturing”, “CAD/CAM”, ''Benefits” and “Advantage”. Only in vitro studies comparing CAD/CAM technology (printing or milling) with conventional manufacturing were included, and studies without a control group and prostheses on implants were excluded. Results: The strategy used resulted in 410 articles. Of these, 11 met the inclusion criteria. After reading in full, only 6 were included in the systematic review. Despite requiring a high investment and professional training, the selected studies demonstrated the following advantages of the CAD/CAM system over the conventional one: less monomer release and better adaptation of the dentures Conclusion: The manufacturing process of total dentures through the system CAD/CAM proved to be advantageous compared to the conventional method, the main one being the lower release of monomer, accompanied by better biomechanical qualities and marginal adaptation, despite its high cost.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625
10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i2.25625
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/25625/22512
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 2; e24911225625
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 2; e24911225625
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 2; e24911225625
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052703101157376