Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15372 |
Resumo: | Conclusion is the last textual element in a scientific paper; Its presentation form, however, is not yet standardized among the publications of scientific journals. The objective of this research was to carry out an analysis on the form of the conclusive writing in national scientific articles, based on 40 periodicals of the area of agrarian sciences, published in the period 2003-2017. The analyzed indicators were: forms (synonyms) of the writing of Conclusion; Type of signal used before each conclusion; Number of conclusions; Style of the Conclusion; Verb tense used in the concluding paragraphs; Presence of personifying expressions; and presence of the object of study in the concluding paragraphs. The results show that the expression CONCLUSIONS (plural and upper case) is the most used (32.507%) among the analyzed journals; Simple paragraph (without number or symbol) is predominant (70%); 45% of the articles present 2 (two) specific conclusions; 70% of the articles only show Conclusion (without additional information); The “present” tense is the most used form in the concluding paragraphs (40%); conclusions are written impersonally (100%); and the presence of the object of study (in all articles: crops) in the concluding paragraphs is more prevalent through vulgar nomenclature (62.50%). It is concluded that the diverse form of presentation of the conclusive paragraphs in national scientific articles, in the area of agriculture sciences, deserves special attention in the search for a model that allows narrowing its multiple form in order to achieve a more functional writing. |
id |
UNIFEI_68e3228c039804e06b1697ba1b7d3c41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15372 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian SciencesAnálisis sobre la forma de redacción concluyente en artículos científicos en el campo de las Ciencias AgrícolasAnálise sobre a forma da escrita conclusiva em artigos científicos na área de Ciências Agrárias EnsenãnzaMetodología científicaConclusiónArtículo científico.TeachingScientific methodologyConclusionScientific article.EnsinoMetodologia científicaConclusãoArtigo científico.Conclusion is the last textual element in a scientific paper; Its presentation form, however, is not yet standardized among the publications of scientific journals. The objective of this research was to carry out an analysis on the form of the conclusive writing in national scientific articles, based on 40 periodicals of the area of agrarian sciences, published in the period 2003-2017. The analyzed indicators were: forms (synonyms) of the writing of Conclusion; Type of signal used before each conclusion; Number of conclusions; Style of the Conclusion; Verb tense used in the concluding paragraphs; Presence of personifying expressions; and presence of the object of study in the concluding paragraphs. The results show that the expression CONCLUSIONS (plural and upper case) is the most used (32.507%) among the analyzed journals; Simple paragraph (without number or symbol) is predominant (70%); 45% of the articles present 2 (two) specific conclusions; 70% of the articles only show Conclusion (without additional information); The “present” tense is the most used form in the concluding paragraphs (40%); conclusions are written impersonally (100%); and the presence of the object of study (in all articles: crops) in the concluding paragraphs is more prevalent through vulgar nomenclature (62.50%). It is concluded that the diverse form of presentation of the conclusive paragraphs in national scientific articles, in the area of agriculture sciences, deserves special attention in the search for a model that allows narrowing its multiple form in order to achieve a more functional writing.La conclusión es el último elemento textual de un artículo científico; su forma de presentación, sin embargo, aún no está estandarizada entre las publicaciones de revistas científicas. El objetivo de esta investigación fue realizar un análisis sobre la forma de redacción concluyente en artículos científicos nacionales, a partir de 40 revistas del área de ciencias agrícolas, publicadas en el período 2003-2017. Los indicadores analizados fueron: formas (sinónimos) de redacción de Conclusiones; tipo de señal utilizada antes de cada conclusión; número de conclusiones; estilo de terminación; tiempo verbal usado en los párrafos finales; presencia de expresiones personificadas; y presencia del objeto de estudio en los párrafos finales. Los resultados muestran que la expresión CONCLUSIONES (plural y mayúscula) es la más utilizada (32,507%) entre las revistas analizadas; predomina el uso de un párrafo simple (sin número ni símbolo) (70%); El 45% de los artículos presenta 2 (dos) conclusiones específicas; El 70% de los artículos muestran solo la Conclusión (sin información adicional); el tiempo verbal en "presente" es la forma más utilizada en los párrafos finales (40%); las conclusiones están redactadas de forma impersonal (100%); y la presencia del objeto de estudio en los párrafos finales es más prevalente a través de la nomenclatura común (62,50%). Se concluye que la forma diversificada de presentación de los párrafos finales en los artículos científicos nacionales, en el área de las ciencias agrarias, merece especial atención en la búsqueda de un modelo que permita acotar su forma múltiple para una redacción más funcional.Conclusão é o último elemento textual em um artigo científico; sua forma de apresentação, porém, ainda não é padronizada entre as publicações de revistas científicas. O objetivo desta investigação foi efetuar uma análise sobre a forma da escrita conclusiva em artigos científicos nacionais, com base em 40 periódicos da área de ciências agrárias, publicados no período 2003-2017. Os indicadores analisados foram: formas (sinônimos) da escrita de Conclusão; tipo de sinal usado antes de cada conclusão; número de conclusões; estilo da conclusão; tempo de verbo utilizado nos parágrafos conclusivos; presença de expressões personificadas; e presença do objeto de estudo nos parágrafos conclusivos. Os resultados demonstram que a expressão CONCLUSÕES (plural e em caixa alta) é a mais usada (32,507%) entre as revistas analisadas; o uso de parágrafo simples (sem número ou símbolo) é predominante (70%); 45% dos artigos apresentam 2 (duas) conclusões específicas; 70% dos artigos exibem apenas a Conclusão (sem informação adicional); o tempo de verbo no “presente” é a forma mais utilizada nos parágrafos conclusivos (40%); as conclusões são escritas de forma impessoal (100%); e a presença do objeto de estudo nos parágrafos conclusivos tem maior prevalência através da nomenclatura vulgar (62,50%). Conclui-se que a forma diversificada de apresentação dos parágrafos conclusivos em artigos científicos nacionais, na área de ciências agrárias, merece uma atenção especial na busca de um modelo que permita estreitar sua múltipla forma para uma escrita mais funcional.Research, Society and Development2021-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1537210.33448/rsd-v10i5.15372Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e58510515372Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e58510515372Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e585105153722525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15372/13742Copyright (c) 2021 Italo de Souza Aquinohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAquino, Italo de Souza 2021-05-17T18:20:49Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15372Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:36:12.758449Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences Análisis sobre la forma de redacción concluyente en artículos científicos en el campo de las Ciencias Agrícolas Análise sobre a forma da escrita conclusiva em artigos científicos na área de Ciências Agrárias |
title |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences Aquino, Italo de Souza Ensenãnza Metodología científica Conclusión Artículo científico. Teaching Scientific methodology Conclusion Scientific article. Ensino Metodologia científica Conclusão Artigo científico. |
title_short |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
title_full |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
title_fullStr |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
title_sort |
Analysis on the form of conclusive writing in scientific articles in the field of Agrarian Sciences |
author |
Aquino, Italo de Souza |
author_facet |
Aquino, Italo de Souza |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aquino, Italo de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ensenãnza Metodología científica Conclusión Artículo científico. Teaching Scientific methodology Conclusion Scientific article. Ensino Metodologia científica Conclusão Artigo científico. |
topic |
Ensenãnza Metodología científica Conclusión Artículo científico. Teaching Scientific methodology Conclusion Scientific article. Ensino Metodologia científica Conclusão Artigo científico. |
description |
Conclusion is the last textual element in a scientific paper; Its presentation form, however, is not yet standardized among the publications of scientific journals. The objective of this research was to carry out an analysis on the form of the conclusive writing in national scientific articles, based on 40 periodicals of the area of agrarian sciences, published in the period 2003-2017. The analyzed indicators were: forms (synonyms) of the writing of Conclusion; Type of signal used before each conclusion; Number of conclusions; Style of the Conclusion; Verb tense used in the concluding paragraphs; Presence of personifying expressions; and presence of the object of study in the concluding paragraphs. The results show that the expression CONCLUSIONS (plural and upper case) is the most used (32.507%) among the analyzed journals; Simple paragraph (without number or symbol) is predominant (70%); 45% of the articles present 2 (two) specific conclusions; 70% of the articles only show Conclusion (without additional information); The “present” tense is the most used form in the concluding paragraphs (40%); conclusions are written impersonally (100%); and the presence of the object of study (in all articles: crops) in the concluding paragraphs is more prevalent through vulgar nomenclature (62.50%). It is concluded that the diverse form of presentation of the conclusive paragraphs in national scientific articles, in the area of agriculture sciences, deserves special attention in the search for a model that allows narrowing its multiple form in order to achieve a more functional writing. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15372 10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15372 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15372 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15372 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/15372/13742 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Italo de Souza Aquino https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Italo de Souza Aquino https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 5; e58510515372 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 5; e58510515372 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 5; e58510515372 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052749388447744 |