Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Antônio Veimar da
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Carla Michelle da, Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de, Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira, Silva Neto, José Vitorino da, Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da, Vaz, Milena Almeida, Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones.
id UNIFEI_73c75bb93076845e1144fa3940d83bcd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10991
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadowsRendimiento agronómico de la lechuga con diferentes sustratos orgánicos y sombrasDesempenho agronômico da alface com diferentes substratos orgânicos e sombreamentosMicroclimaAmbiente protegidoTela de sombreamentoSubstratos orgânicos.MicroclimateProtected environmentShading screenOrganic substrates.MicroclimaAmbiente protegidoPantalla de sombraSustratos orgânicos.The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones.El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar los efectos de diferentes sustratos orgánicos en la producción de lechuga sometida a diferentes condiciones de luz utilizando pantallas de sombreado de 30, 50, 70 y 80% y campo abierto. Los sustratos orgánicos utilizados fueron Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying y el producto comercial Basaplant (testigo). El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar, en un esquema factorial de 5 x 5 con 4 repeticiones. Se observó que los ambientes protegidos redujeron la temperatura media y máxima del aire, la luminosidad media y máxima y la humedad relativa del aire medio y máximo en comparación con el campo abierto. Los productos Silk Flower y Mata-pasto, en general, demostraron ser superiores a otros fertilizantes orgánicos. Para el cultivo de lechuga en lugares donde la temperatura y las luminosidades son altas y la humedad del aire es baja, el uso de pantalla de sombrites entre 50 y 70% de sombreados son los recomendados.Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de diferentes substratos orgânico na produção da alface submetidos a diferentes condições de luminosidade, usando telas de sombreamentos de 30, 50, 70 e 80% desombreamento e um campo aberto. Os substratos orgânicos utilizados foram o Mata-pasto, Flor de Seda, Jitirana, Esterco bovino e o produto comercial Basaplant (testemunha). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi inteiramente casualizados, em esquema fatorial 5 x 5 com 4 repetições. Foi observado que os ambientes protegidos reduziram a temperatura do ar média e máxima, a luminosidade média e máxima e a Umidade relativa do ar média e máxima em comparação com o campo aberto. Os produtos Flor de seda e Mata-pasto, no geral, se mostrou superior aos demais adubos orgânicos. Para o cultivo de alface em locais onde a temperatura e a luminosidades são altas e a umidade do ar são baixas, autilização de tela de sombrites entre 50 e 70% de sombreamentos são as recomedadas.Research, Society and Development2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1099110.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e25691210991Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e25691210991Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e256912109912525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991/9888Copyright (c) 2020 Antônio Veimar da Silva; Carla Michelle da Silva; Manoel Cícero de Oliveira Filho; José de Oliveira Albano Júnior; José Vitorino da Silva Neto; João Henrique Barbosa da Silva; Milena Almeida Vaz; Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues Lealhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Antônio Veimar daSilva, Carla Michelle da Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira Silva Neto, José Vitorino da Silva, João Henrique Barbosa daVaz, Milena Almeida Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10991Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:55.845319Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
Rendimiento agronómico de la lechuga con diferentes sustratos orgánicos y sombras
Desempenho agronômico da alface com diferentes substratos orgânicos e sombreamentos
title Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
spellingShingle Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
Silva, Antônio Veimar da
Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Tela de sombreamento
Substratos orgânicos.
Microclimate
Protected environment
Shading screen
Organic substrates.
Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Pantalla de sombra
Sustratos orgânicos.
title_short Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
title_full Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
title_fullStr Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
title_sort Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
author Silva, Antônio Veimar da
author_facet Silva, Antônio Veimar da
Silva, Carla Michelle da
Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de
Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira
Silva Neto, José Vitorino da
Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da
Vaz, Milena Almeida
Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Silva, Carla Michelle da
Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de
Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira
Silva Neto, José Vitorino da
Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da
Vaz, Milena Almeida
Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Antônio Veimar da
Silva, Carla Michelle da
Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de
Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira
Silva Neto, José Vitorino da
Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da
Vaz, Milena Almeida
Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Tela de sombreamento
Substratos orgânicos.
Microclimate
Protected environment
Shading screen
Organic substrates.
Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Pantalla de sombra
Sustratos orgânicos.
topic Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Tela de sombreamento
Substratos orgânicos.
Microclimate
Protected environment
Shading screen
Organic substrates.
Microclima
Ambiente protegido
Pantalla de sombra
Sustratos orgânicos.
description The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991/9888
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e25691210991
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e25691210991
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e25691210991
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052666474397696