Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones. |
id |
UNIFEI_73c75bb93076845e1144fa3940d83bcd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10991 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadowsRendimiento agronómico de la lechuga con diferentes sustratos orgánicos y sombrasDesempenho agronômico da alface com diferentes substratos orgânicos e sombreamentosMicroclimaAmbiente protegidoTela de sombreamentoSubstratos orgânicos.MicroclimateProtected environmentShading screenOrganic substrates.MicroclimaAmbiente protegidoPantalla de sombraSustratos orgânicos.The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones.El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar los efectos de diferentes sustratos orgánicos en la producción de lechuga sometida a diferentes condiciones de luz utilizando pantallas de sombreado de 30, 50, 70 y 80% y campo abierto. Los sustratos orgánicos utilizados fueron Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying y el producto comercial Basaplant (testigo). El diseño experimental fue completamente al azar, en un esquema factorial de 5 x 5 con 4 repeticiones. Se observó que los ambientes protegidos redujeron la temperatura media y máxima del aire, la luminosidad media y máxima y la humedad relativa del aire medio y máximo en comparación con el campo abierto. Los productos Silk Flower y Mata-pasto, en general, demostraron ser superiores a otros fertilizantes orgánicos. Para el cultivo de lechuga en lugares donde la temperatura y las luminosidades son altas y la humedad del aire es baja, el uso de pantalla de sombrites entre 50 y 70% de sombreados son los recomendados.Este trabalho tem como objetivo avaliar os efeitos de diferentes substratos orgânico na produção da alface submetidos a diferentes condições de luminosidade, usando telas de sombreamentos de 30, 50, 70 e 80% desombreamento e um campo aberto. Os substratos orgânicos utilizados foram o Mata-pasto, Flor de Seda, Jitirana, Esterco bovino e o produto comercial Basaplant (testemunha). O delineamento experimental utilizado foi inteiramente casualizados, em esquema fatorial 5 x 5 com 4 repetições. Foi observado que os ambientes protegidos reduziram a temperatura do ar média e máxima, a luminosidade média e máxima e a Umidade relativa do ar média e máxima em comparação com o campo aberto. Os produtos Flor de seda e Mata-pasto, no geral, se mostrou superior aos demais adubos orgânicos. Para o cultivo de alface em locais onde a temperatura e a luminosidades são altas e a umidade do ar são baixas, autilização de tela de sombrites entre 50 e 70% de sombreamentos são as recomedadas.Research, Society and Development2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1099110.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e25691210991Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e25691210991Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e256912109912525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991/9888Copyright (c) 2020 Antônio Veimar da Silva; Carla Michelle da Silva; Manoel Cícero de Oliveira Filho; José de Oliveira Albano Júnior; José Vitorino da Silva Neto; João Henrique Barbosa da Silva; Milena Almeida Vaz; Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues Lealhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Antônio Veimar daSilva, Carla Michelle da Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira Silva Neto, José Vitorino da Silva, João Henrique Barbosa daVaz, Milena Almeida Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10991Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:55.845319Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows Rendimiento agronómico de la lechuga con diferentes sustratos orgánicos y sombras Desempenho agronômico da alface com diferentes substratos orgânicos e sombreamentos |
title |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
spellingShingle |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows Silva, Antônio Veimar da Microclima Ambiente protegido Tela de sombreamento Substratos orgânicos. Microclimate Protected environment Shading screen Organic substrates. Microclima Ambiente protegido Pantalla de sombra Sustratos orgânicos. |
title_short |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
title_full |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
title_fullStr |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
title_sort |
Agronomic performance of lettuce with different organic substrates and shadows |
author |
Silva, Antônio Veimar da |
author_facet |
Silva, Antônio Veimar da Silva, Carla Michelle da Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira Silva Neto, José Vitorino da Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da Vaz, Milena Almeida Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Carla Michelle da Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira Silva Neto, José Vitorino da Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da Vaz, Milena Almeida Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Antônio Veimar da Silva, Carla Michelle da Oliveira Filho, Manoel Cícero de Albano Júnior, José de Oliveira Silva Neto, José Vitorino da Silva, João Henrique Barbosa da Vaz, Milena Almeida Leal, Francisco Reinaldo Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Microclima Ambiente protegido Tela de sombreamento Substratos orgânicos. Microclimate Protected environment Shading screen Organic substrates. Microclima Ambiente protegido Pantalla de sombra Sustratos orgânicos. |
topic |
Microclima Ambiente protegido Tela de sombreamento Substratos orgânicos. Microclimate Protected environment Shading screen Organic substrates. Microclima Ambiente protegido Pantalla de sombra Sustratos orgânicos. |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the effects of different organic substrates on the lettuce production submitted to different light conditions using 30, 50, 70 and 80% shading screens and an open field. The organic substrates used were Mata Pasto, Silk Flower, Jitirana, Bovine Spraying and the commercial product Basaplant (control). The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 5 x 5 factorial scheme with 4 replicates. It was observed that the protected environments reduced the average and maximum air temperature, the average and maximum luminosity and the relative humidity of the average and maximum air compared to the open field. Silk Flower and Mata-pasto products, in general, proved to be superior to other organic fertilizers. For the cultivation of lettuce in places where the temperature and the luminosities are high and the humidity of the air are low, use of screen of sombrites between 50 and 70% of shadings are the recommended ones. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10991 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10991/9888 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e25691210991 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e25691210991 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e25691210991 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052666474397696 |