Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso, Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de, Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez, Fávero, Priscila Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557
Resumo: Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules.
id UNIFEI_7bd27d41c7474c50bb70919b8246af9d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10557
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspectiveEvaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía por ultrasonido de deformación de los nódulos tiroideos: una nueva perspectiva de clasificaciónAvaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo strain por ultrassom de nódulos de tireoides: uma nova perspectiva de classificaçãoElastographyThyroid nodulesUltrasound of thyroid.ElastografíaNódulos tiroideosEcografía de tiroides.ElastografiaNódulos de tireoideUltrassonografia de tireoide.Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules.Introducción: Clásicamente, los nódulos tiroideos se evalúan inicialmente mediante ecografía en Modo B. A pesar de ser sensible para el diagnóstico de NT, no tiene en cuenta la rigidez del nódulo, característica importante que se relaciona con su malignidad. En este sentido, la elastografía se ha utilizado como instrumento para ayudar en el diagnóstico de nódulos tiroideos. Teniendo esto en cuenta, el objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar cualitativamente la realización de la elastografía de presión manual en el diagnóstico diferencial de nódulos tiroideos malignos y benignos en adultos. Método: Se trata de un estudio prospectivo, observacional, que incluyó a pacientes que presentaban nódulos tiroideos y requerían aspiración con aguja fina (PAAF). La elastografía se obtuvo en tiempo real desde EE. UU. En Modo B. El porcentaje del área rígida del nódulo se calculó utilizando el software ImageJ. Resultados: El estudio incluyó a 41 pacientes, 87,8% mujeres. La edad osciló entre 18 y 75 años, con una media de 46,4 años (DE: 13,57). La mayoría de los nódulos se clasificaron como TI-RADS 3, 53,7%. En cuanto a la clasificación de Bethesda, el 82,9% de la muestra se clasificó como Bethesda 2 (nódulo benigno). El porcentaje de área rígida (% AR) osciló entre el 3% y el 73%, con un promedio de 28,73% (DE: 18,15). Los nódulos altamente sospechosos de la clasificación TI-RADS tuvieron un AR% más alto (51,6%). En cuanto al análisis citológico, los nódulos caracterizados como benignos tuvieron un AR% promedio de 24,23% (DE: 13,66), mientras que los malignos del 55% (DE: 19,94), una diferencia de 30,77%, que resultó ser estadísticamente significativa (p <0,001). Conclusión: La evaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía tipo Strain basada en la evaluación del% AR demostró ser útil para discriminar entre nódulos benignos y malignos y se presenta como una herramienta que puede complementar la evaluación de nódulos tiroideos.Introdução: Classicamente os nódulos de tireoide são avaliados inicialmente pela ultrassonografia no Modo B. Apesar de ser sensível para o diagnóstico dos NT, ela não leva em consideração a rigidez do nódulo, uma importante característica que possui relação com a malignidade deste. Nesse sentido, têm se empregado a elastografia como instrumento para auxiliar o diagnóstico de nódulos de tireoide. Tendo isso em vista, o objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar o desempenho da elastografia por pressão manual de forma qualitativa no diagnóstico diferencial de nódulos tireoidianos malignos e benignos em adultos. Método: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo, observacional, que incluiu pacientes que apresentavam nódulos de tireoide e necessitassem de punção aspirativa por agulha fina (PAAF). A elastografia foi obtida em tempo real junto ao US no Modo B. Foi realizado o cálculo da percentual de área rígida do nódulo com auxílio do software ImageJ. Resultados: O estudo incluiu 41 pacientes, 87,8% do sexo feminino. A idade variou entre 18 a 75 anos, com média de 46,4 anos (DP: 13,57). A maior parte dos nódulos foram classificados como TI-RADS 3, 53,7%. Quanto a classificação de Bethesda, 82,9% da amostra foi classificado como Bethesda 2 (nódulo benigno). O percentual de área rígida (%AR) variou de 3% a 73%, com média de 28,73% (DP: 18,15). Nódulos altamente suspeitos da classificação TI-RADS tiveram maior %AR (51,6%). Em relação a análise citológica, os nódulos caracterizados como benignos tiveram média do %AR de 24,23% (DP: 13,66), enquanto os malignos de 55% (DP: 19,94), uma diferença de 30,77%, que se mostrou estatisticamente significativa (p < 0,001). Conclusão: A avaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo Strain a partir da avaliação do %AR se mostrou útil para discriminar nódulos benignos e malignos e se apresenta como uma ferramenta que pode complementar a avaliação de nódulos de tireoide.Research, Society and Development2020-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/1055710.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e2491210557Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e2491210557Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e24912105572525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557/9616Copyright (c) 2020 Antônio José de Macedo Bernardes; Ivan Luiz Pedroso Pires; Matheus Rodrigues de Souza; Fabiana Alvarez Domiciliano; Priscila Pereira Fáverohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBernardes, Antônio José de Macedo Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez Fávero, Priscila Pereira 2020-12-30T23:32:22Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10557Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:32:36.290460Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
Evaluación cuantitativa de la elastografía por ultrasonido de deformación de los nódulos tiroideos: una nueva perspectiva de clasificación
Avaliação quantitativa da elastografia do tipo strain por ultrassom de nódulos de tireoides: uma nova perspectiva de classificação
title Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
spellingShingle Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo
Elastography
Thyroid nodules
Ultrasound of thyroid.
Elastografía
Nódulos tiroideos
Ecografía de tiroides.
Elastografia
Nódulos de tireoide
Ultrassonografia de tireoide.
title_short Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
title_full Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
title_sort Quantitative evaluation of strain ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules: a new classification perspective
author Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo
author_facet Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo
Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso
Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de
Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez
Fávero, Priscila Pereira
author_role author
author2 Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso
Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de
Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez
Fávero, Priscila Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bernardes, Antônio José de Macedo
Pires, Ivan Luiz Pedroso
Souza, Matheus Rodrigues de
Domiciliano, Fabiana Alvarez
Fávero, Priscila Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Elastography
Thyroid nodules
Ultrasound of thyroid.
Elastografía
Nódulos tiroideos
Ecografía de tiroides.
Elastografia
Nódulos de tireoide
Ultrassonografia de tireoide.
topic Elastography
Thyroid nodules
Ultrasound of thyroid.
Elastografía
Nódulos tiroideos
Ecografía de tiroides.
Elastografia
Nódulos de tireoide
Ultrassonografia de tireoide.
description Introduction: Classically, thyroid nodules are initially evaluated by ultrasonography in Mode B. Despite being sensitive for the diagnosis of NT, it does not take into account the stiffness of the nodule, an important characteristic that is related to its malignancy. In this sense, elastography has been used as an instrument to assist in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. With this in mind, the aim of the present study is to qualitatively assess the performance of manual pressure elastography in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign thyroid nodules in adults. Method: This is a prospective, observational study, which included patients who had thyroid nodules and required fine needle aspiration (FNAB). The elastography was obtained in real time from the US in Mode B. The percentage of the nodule's rigid area was calculated using the ImageJ software. Results: The study included 41 patients, 87.8% female. Age ranged from 18 to 75 years, with an average of 46.4 years (SD: 13.57). Most of the nodules were classified as TI-RADS 3, 53.7%. As for the Bethesda classification, 82.9% of the sample was classified as Bethesda 2 (benign nodule). The percentage of rigid area (% AR) ranged from 3% to 73%, with an average of 28.73% (SD: 18.15). Highly suspicious nodules from the TI-RADS classification had a higher AR% (51.6%). Regarding cytological analysis, nodules characterized as benign had an average AR% of 24.23% (SD: 13.66), while malignant ones of 55% (SD: 19.94), a difference of 30.77% , which proved to be statistically significant (p <0.001). Conclusion: The quantitative evaluation of Strain-type elastography based on the% AR evaluation proved to be useful to discriminate between benign and malignant nodules and is presented as a tool that can complement the assessment of thyroid nodules.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557
10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i12.10557
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/10557/9616
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 12; e2491210557
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 12; e2491210557
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 12; e2491210557
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052665197232128