Skills Assessment Questionnaire Applying the Paraconsistent Annotated Evidential Logic Eτ

• Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Samira Sestari do
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Nääs, Irenilza de Alencar, Abe, Jair Minoro, Oliveira, Cristina Corrêa de, Forçan, Luiz Roberto
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
• Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/13444
• topic: Competencia; Herramienta de Evaluación; Logica paraconsistente anotada evidencial Eτ.; Competência; Instrumento de Avaliação; Lógica paraconsistente anotada evidencial Eτ; Competence; Evaluation instrument; Paraconsistent annotated evidential logic Eτ.

The hiring of managers in civil construction is gradually changing, being imposed by constant market changes. This study aims to develop and evaluate an instrument's reliability for assessing behavioral competencies for hiring project managers, minimizing subjective bias and possible conflicts of evaluators in the selection process. Due to the need to manipulate uncertain, conflicting data and even lack of data, the construct uses the Paraconsistent Annotated Evidential Logic Eτ, in two dimensions, endowed with a language that can express the favorable evidence and the unfavorable evidence of behavioral competencies, which can cover the situations mentioned above. The Content Validity Index was used to analyze the reliability using a Likert scale. The evaluations were carried out with six judges, and in the first stage, three judges weighed lower than expected values. After explanation in the second round, the judges considered the instrument viable, with an agreement score of µ 86% and λ 82% and Content Validity Index with a score of µ 0.92 and λ 0.85, achieving effective verification and procedures theoretical and analytical are carried out and validated, being promising in the evaluation.