Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Machado, Magali Silva Sanches
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32811
Resumo: The present study aimed to discuss the safe techniques for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Integrative literature review with data collection in the following databases: PubMed, UpToDate and Scielo. The descriptors were used: “Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “Anatomical references for videocholecystectomy”, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. Totaling in a selection of 39 articles discussed. Currently, the laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for cholecystectomy, being considered a basic laparoscopic procedure, because the gallbladder is fixed to the liver and with this, the surgeon works in a single quadrant, avoiding large displacements in the abdominal cavity. However, for the technique to be developed in a safe way for both the surgeon and the patient, a rich anatomical knowledge is essential. Initially, a detailed abdominal inspection is necessary, aiming at the correct choice of the site of entry of the trochanters. After that, the surgeon should opt for the Critical View technique. After that, it is necessary to know some fixed anatomical landmarks to find the safe zone of dissection delineating the cystic duct and the cystic artery. Finally, it is important that a time limit is established for each step. Such a procedure, if followed correctly, is considered very safe, however, the risk of bile duct injury remains a significant concern, particularly in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy or with aberrant anatomy. Thus, the causes of biliary injuries are classified into two types: problems of incorrect identification of the anatomy and problems of technique.
id UNIFEI_e53e9800ea40ed6832b7be6dd0b0ceb1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32811
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review Técnicas anatómicas y referencias para una colecistectomía laparoscópica segura: revisión de la literatura Técnicas e referencias anatômicas para uma colecistectomia laparoscópica segura: uma Revisão de Literatura Colecistectomia laparoscópicaColecistectomiaLaparoscopia cirúrgica.Colecistectomía laparoscópicaColecistectomíaLaparoscopia quirúrgica.Laparoscopic cholecystectomyCholecystectomySurgical laparoscopy.The present study aimed to discuss the safe techniques for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Integrative literature review with data collection in the following databases: PubMed, UpToDate and Scielo. The descriptors were used: “Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “Anatomical references for videocholecystectomy”, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. Totaling in a selection of 39 articles discussed. Currently, the laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for cholecystectomy, being considered a basic laparoscopic procedure, because the gallbladder is fixed to the liver and with this, the surgeon works in a single quadrant, avoiding large displacements in the abdominal cavity. However, for the technique to be developed in a safe way for both the surgeon and the patient, a rich anatomical knowledge is essential. Initially, a detailed abdominal inspection is necessary, aiming at the correct choice of the site of entry of the trochanters. After that, the surgeon should opt for the Critical View technique. After that, it is necessary to know some fixed anatomical landmarks to find the safe zone of dissection delineating the cystic duct and the cystic artery. Finally, it is important that a time limit is established for each step. Such a procedure, if followed correctly, is considered very safe, however, the risk of bile duct injury remains a significant concern, particularly in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy or with aberrant anatomy. Thus, the causes of biliary injuries are classified into two types: problems of incorrect identification of the anatomy and problems of technique.El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo discutir las técnicas seguras para una colecistectomía laparoscópica. Revisión integradora de literatura con recolección de datos en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, UpToDate y Scielo. Se utilizaron los descriptores: “Colecistectomía laparoscópica segura”, “Referencias anatómicas para videocolecistectomía”, “Colecistectomía laparoscópica”. Totalizando en una selección de 39 artículos discutidos. Actualmente, el abordaje laparoscópico es el estándar de oro para la colecistectomía, siendo considerado un procedimiento laparoscópico básico, debido a que la vesícula biliar se fija al hígado y con ello el cirujano trabaja en un solo cuadrante, evitando grandes desplazamientos en la cavidad abdominal. Sin embargo, para que la técnica se desarrolle de forma segura tanto para el cirujano como para el paciente, es fundamental un rico conocimiento anatómico. Inicialmente, es necesaria una inspección abdominal detallada, con el objetivo de elegir correctamente el sitio de entrada de los trocánteres. Posteriormente, el cirujano debe optar por la técnica de Vista Crítica. Después de eso, es necesario conocer algunos puntos de referencia anatómicos fijos para encontrar la zona segura de disección que delimita el conducto cístico y la arteria cística. Finalmente, es importante que se establezca un límite de tiempo para cada paso. Tal procedimiento, si se sigue correctamente, se considera muy seguro; sin embargo, el riesgo de lesión del conducto biliar sigue siendo una preocupación importante, particularmente en colecistectomía laparoscópica difícil o con anatomía anómala. Así, las causas de las lesiones biliares se clasifican en dos tipos: problemas de identificación incorrecta de la anatomía y problemas de técnica.O presente estudo teve como objetivo discorrer a respeito das técnicas seguras para uma colecistectomia laparoscópica. Revisão integrativa de literatura com levantamento de dados nas bases: PubMed, UpToDate e Scielo. Utilizou-se os descritores: “Colecistectomia laparoscópica segura”, “Referencias anatômicas para videocolecistectomia”, “Colecistectomia por via laparoscópica”. Totalizando em uma seleção de 39 artigos discutidos. Atualmente a abordagem laparoscópica é o padrão ouro para a colecistectomia, sendo considerada um procedimento laparoscópico básico, porque a vesícula biliar é fixada ao fígado e com isto, o cirurgião trabalha em um único quadrante, evitando grandes deslocamentos na cavidade abdominal. No entanto, para que a técnica seja elaborada de maneira segura tanto para o cirurgião quanto para o paciente, faz-se fundamental um rico conhecimento anatômico. Inicialmente torna-se necessária a inspeção abdominal detalhada visando a escolha correta do local de entrada dos trocanteres. Posterior a isto o cirurgião deve optar pela técnica Critical View. Seguido a isto, faz-se necessário o conhecimento de alguns marcos anatômicos fixos para encontrar a zona segura de dissecção delineando o ducto cístico e a artéria cística. Por fim, é importante que seja estabelecido um tempo limite para cada etapa. Tal procedimento, se seguido de maneira correta, é considerado muito seguro, no entanto, o risco de lesão do ducto biliar continua a ser uma preocupação significativa, principalmente em colecistectomia videolaparoscópica difícil ou com anatomia aberrante. Assim, as causas das lesões biliares são classificadas em dois tipos: problemas de identificação incorreta da anatomia e problemas de técnica.Research, Society and Development2022-08-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3281110.33448/rsd-v11i10.32811Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e363111032811Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e363111032811Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e3631110328112525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32811/28130Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Luis Baldomar Hurtado ; Magali Silva Sanches Machadohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar Machado, Magali Silva Sanches 2022-08-12T22:23:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/32811Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:48:40.528082Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
Técnicas anatómicas y referencias para una colecistectomía laparoscópica segura: revisión de la literatura
Técnicas e referencias anatômicas para uma colecistectomia laparoscópica segura: uma Revisão de Literatura
title Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
spellingShingle Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
Hurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar
Colecistectomia laparoscópica
Colecistectomia
Laparoscopia cirúrgica.
Colecistectomía laparoscópica
Colecistectomía
Laparoscopia quirúrgica.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Surgical laparoscopy.
title_short Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
title_full Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
title_fullStr Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
title_sort Anatomical techniques and references for a safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a literature review
author Hurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar
author_facet Hurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar
Machado, Magali Silva Sanches
author_role author
author2 Machado, Magali Silva Sanches
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hurtado , Pedro Luis Baldomar
Machado, Magali Silva Sanches
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colecistectomia laparoscópica
Colecistectomia
Laparoscopia cirúrgica.
Colecistectomía laparoscópica
Colecistectomía
Laparoscopia quirúrgica.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Surgical laparoscopy.
topic Colecistectomia laparoscópica
Colecistectomia
Laparoscopia cirúrgica.
Colecistectomía laparoscópica
Colecistectomía
Laparoscopia quirúrgica.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Surgical laparoscopy.
description The present study aimed to discuss the safe techniques for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Integrative literature review with data collection in the following databases: PubMed, UpToDate and Scielo. The descriptors were used: “Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy”, “Anatomical references for videocholecystectomy”, “Laparoscopic cholecystectomy”. Totaling in a selection of 39 articles discussed. Currently, the laparoscopic approach is the gold standard for cholecystectomy, being considered a basic laparoscopic procedure, because the gallbladder is fixed to the liver and with this, the surgeon works in a single quadrant, avoiding large displacements in the abdominal cavity. However, for the technique to be developed in a safe way for both the surgeon and the patient, a rich anatomical knowledge is essential. Initially, a detailed abdominal inspection is necessary, aiming at the correct choice of the site of entry of the trochanters. After that, the surgeon should opt for the Critical View technique. After that, it is necessary to know some fixed anatomical landmarks to find the safe zone of dissection delineating the cystic duct and the cystic artery. Finally, it is important that a time limit is established for each step. Such a procedure, if followed correctly, is considered very safe, however, the risk of bile duct injury remains a significant concern, particularly in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy or with aberrant anatomy. Thus, the causes of biliary injuries are classified into two types: problems of incorrect identification of the anatomy and problems of technique.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32811
10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32811
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32811
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32811
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/32811/28130
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Luis Baldomar Hurtado ; Magali Silva Sanches Machado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Luis Baldomar Hurtado ; Magali Silva Sanches Machado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 10; e363111032811
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 10; e363111032811
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 10; e363111032811
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052719144370176