Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sahd, Fabio Bacila
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488
Resumo: This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies.
id UNIJ-1_e3a11034e4c9bac081d1ff33c850ef15
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/8488
network_acronym_str UNIJ-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?OS DIREITOS HUMANOS E SUA EFICÁCIA PROTETIVA NA ENCRUZILHADA: DIREITO À BARBÁRIE OU DIREITOS DOS OPRIMIDOS?human rights; Modernity; Coloniality.direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade.This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies.O presente artigo propõe uma revisão bibliográfica e tece considerações críticas acerca da fundamentação teórica, histórico e efetividade protetiva dos direitos humanos. Contrasta-se o avanço normativo com a vulnerabilidade concreta e negação de direitos de amplos segmentos. O texto tem início com uma apresentação sucinta dos fundamentos dos direitos humanos, e contextualiza sua consolidação no século XX. Na sequência, são expostas considerações de diferentes autores quanto à sua implementação arbitrária e difundida ineficácia para, por fim, partindo de referencial da sociologia e filosofia política relacionar a fragilidade de sua vigência à própria lógica dicotômica da modernidade que, se por um lado se fundamenta em uma nova lógica de poder baseada em princípios como igualdade e liberdade por outro mantem as desigualdades e opressões anteriores, como de gênero, classe e etnia. Conclui-se que, os avanços normativos continuam fragilizados pela negação prática de direitos, o que pode ser compreendido a partir da própria ambiguidade da modernidade, cujos ideias igualitários estão contraditados pela continuidade de diferentes formas de domínio, discriminação e hierarquias.   EDITORA UNIJUI2019-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/848810.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 7 n. 13 (2019): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 280-2992317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488/6163Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSahd, Fabio Bacila2021-03-25T21:27:54Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/8488Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2021-03-25T21:27:54Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
OS DIREITOS HUMANOS E SUA EFICÁCIA PROTETIVA NA ENCRUZILHADA: DIREITO À BARBÁRIE OU DIREITOS DOS OPRIMIDOS?
title Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
spellingShingle Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
Sahd, Fabio Bacila
human rights; Modernity; Coloniality.
direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade.
title_short Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
title_full Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
title_fullStr Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
title_full_unstemmed Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
title_sort Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
author Sahd, Fabio Bacila
author_facet Sahd, Fabio Bacila
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sahd, Fabio Bacila
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv human rights; Modernity; Coloniality.
direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade.
topic human rights; Modernity; Coloniality.
direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade.
description This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488
10.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299
url https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488
identifier_str_mv 10.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488/6163
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDITORA UNIJUI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 7 n. 13 (2019): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 280-299
2317-5389
reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron:UNIJUI
instname_str Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
instacron_str UNIJUI
institution UNIJUI
reponame_str Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798315162248151040