Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488 |
Resumo: | This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies. |
id |
UNIJ-1_e3a11034e4c9bac081d1ff33c850ef15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/8488 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIJ-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed?OS DIREITOS HUMANOS E SUA EFICÁCIA PROTETIVA NA ENCRUZILHADA: DIREITO À BARBÁRIE OU DIREITOS DOS OPRIMIDOS?human rights; Modernity; Coloniality.direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade.This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies.O presente artigo propõe uma revisão bibliográfica e tece considerações críticas acerca da fundamentação teórica, histórico e efetividade protetiva dos direitos humanos. Contrasta-se o avanço normativo com a vulnerabilidade concreta e negação de direitos de amplos segmentos. O texto tem início com uma apresentação sucinta dos fundamentos dos direitos humanos, e contextualiza sua consolidação no século XX. Na sequência, são expostas considerações de diferentes autores quanto à sua implementação arbitrária e difundida ineficácia para, por fim, partindo de referencial da sociologia e filosofia política relacionar a fragilidade de sua vigência à própria lógica dicotômica da modernidade que, se por um lado se fundamenta em uma nova lógica de poder baseada em princípios como igualdade e liberdade por outro mantem as desigualdades e opressões anteriores, como de gênero, classe e etnia. Conclui-se que, os avanços normativos continuam fragilizados pela negação prática de direitos, o que pode ser compreendido a partir da própria ambiguidade da modernidade, cujos ideias igualitários estão contraditados pela continuidade de diferentes formas de domínio, discriminação e hierarquias. EDITORA UNIJUI2019-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/848810.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 7 n. 13 (2019): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 280-2992317-5389reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainstname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)instacron:UNIJUIporhttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488/6163Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democraciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSahd, Fabio Bacila2021-03-25T21:27:54Zoai:ojs.revistas.unijui.edu.br:article/8488Revistahttps://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/oai2317-53892317-5389opendoar:2021-03-25T21:27:54Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? OS DIREITOS HUMANOS E SUA EFICÁCIA PROTETIVA NA ENCRUZILHADA: DIREITO À BARBÁRIE OU DIREITOS DOS OPRIMIDOS? |
title |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
spellingShingle |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? Sahd, Fabio Bacila human rights; Modernity; Coloniality. direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade. |
title_short |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
title_full |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
title_fullStr |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
title_sort |
Human rights and their protective efficacy in the spotlight: the right to barbarism or the rights of the oppressed? |
author |
Sahd, Fabio Bacila |
author_facet |
Sahd, Fabio Bacila |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sahd, Fabio Bacila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
human rights; Modernity; Coloniality. direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade. |
topic |
human rights; Modernity; Coloniality. direitos humanos; modernidade; colonialidade. |
description |
This article proposes a bibliographical review and makes critical considerations about the historic, theoretical basis and protective effectiveness of human rights. We contrast the normative advance with the concrete vulnerability and denial of rights of wide segments. The text begins with a brief presentation of the foundations of human rights, and contextualizes its consolidation in the twentieth century. In the sequence, are exposed considerations of different authors about their arbitrary implementation and widespread inefficacy. Finally, starting from the referential of sociology and political philosophy We report the fragility of its validity to the very dichotomous logic of modernity that, if on the one hand it is based on a new logic of power based on principles like equality and freedom on the other Maintains the previous inequalities and oppressions, as of gender, class and ethnicity. It is concluded that normative advances continue to be weakened by the practical negation of rights, which can be understood from the very ambiguity of modernity, whose egalitarian ideas are contradicted by the continuity of different forms of domination, discrimination and hierarchies. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488 10.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299 |
url |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21527/2317-5389.2019.13.280-299 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/direitoshumanosedemocracia/article/view/8488/6163 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDITORA UNIJUI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia; v. 7 n. 13 (2019): REVISTA DIREITOS HUMANOS E DEMOCRACIA; 280-299 2317-5389 reponame:Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia instname:Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) instacron:UNIJUI |
instname_str |
Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
instacron_str |
UNIJUI |
institution |
UNIJUI |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Humanos e Democracia - Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798315162248151040 |