The 2010-2012 trienium and the new evaluation of capes periodicals

• Autor(a) principal: Mesquita, Rafael Fernandes de
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Outros Autores: Medeiros, Ana Karine Lima de, Sena, Augusto Marcos Carvalho de, Silva, Mirele Cavalcante da, Gomes, Vládia Maria Pereira
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Revista Educação Ciência e Cultura
• Texto Completo: https://revistas.unilasalle.edu.br/index.php/Educacao/article/view/1298
• topic: Graduate evaluation; Qualis-Capes Journals; PPDAs; Educação; Ciências Sociais Aplicadas; Avaliação; Capes; Pós-Graduação

To study the advances in the Brazilian scientific production and the consequent implications for the academic community, especially as regard to aspects relating to the evaluations of the graduate programs in Business Administration – PPGAs held every three years by CAPES, which classify and punctuate the publications of scientific journals of the permanent professors of the programs can assist the formation and development of new researchers as well as consolidate groups or individuals already experienced in research. In this sense, the aim of this study is to investigate whether the new classification of academic journals in the Qualis-CAPES system, with reference to the previous classification, benefited or not, the centers of diffusion of research in administration located in the southeastern states, when compared to programs in the Northeast. The methodological approach used is descriptive and quantitative and the data collection occurred in the months of April and May 2013. As main results, considering the two classifications, it is evidenced that there was no drop in score of the northeasterners teachers of PPGAs, nor significant variations in the quantitative punctuation of the teachers of PPGAs located in southeastern Brazil.