Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704 |
Resumo: | Among the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program. |
id |
UNISO-1_d6b794abce78f77d317aa0416d03434b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/4704 |
network_acronym_str |
UNISO-1 |
network_name_str |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil Value-added modelLearning outcomesQuality measuresAmong the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program.Unicamp; Uniso2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021)Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 26 n. 2 (2021)1982-57651414-4077reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)instacron:UNISOporhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704/4407Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superiorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Vivian Duarte CoutoMiranda, Gilberto José Alexander , Nicola Pereira, Janser Moura 2021-07-30T22:09:54Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/4704Revistahttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/PUBhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/oai||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br1982-57651414-4077opendoar:2021-07-30T22:09:54Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
title |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto Value-added model Learning outcomes Quality measures |
title_short |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
title_full |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
title_sort |
Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil |
author |
Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto Miranda, Gilberto José Alexander , Nicola Pereira, Janser Moura |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Miranda, Gilberto José Alexander , Nicola Pereira, Janser Moura |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto Miranda, Gilberto José Alexander , Nicola Pereira, Janser Moura |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Value-added model Learning outcomes Quality measures |
topic |
Value-added model Learning outcomes Quality measures |
description |
Among the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704 |
url |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704/4407 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unicamp; Uniso |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unicamp; Uniso |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021) Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 26 n. 2 (2021) 1982-5765 1414-4077 reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online) instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) instacron:UNISO |
instname_str |
Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) |
instacron_str |
UNISO |
institution |
UNISO |
reponame_str |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
collection |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br |
_version_ |
1800219609685557248 |