Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Miranda, Gilberto José, Alexander , Nicola, Pereira, Janser Moura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704
Resumo: Among the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program.
id UNISO-1_d6b794abce78f77d317aa0416d03434b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/4704
network_acronym_str UNISO-1
network_name_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil Value-added modelLearning outcomesQuality measuresAmong the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program.Unicamp; Uniso2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021)Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 26 n. 2 (2021)1982-57651414-4077reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)instacron:UNISOporhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704/4407Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superiorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Vivian Duarte CoutoMiranda, Gilberto José Alexander , Nicola Pereira, Janser Moura 2021-07-30T22:09:54Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/4704Revistahttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/PUBhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/oai||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br1982-57651414-4077opendoar:2021-07-30T22:09:54Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
title Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
spellingShingle Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto
Value-added model
Learning outcomes
Quality measures
title_short Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
title_full Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
title_fullStr Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
title_sort Value-added in Higher Education: a new methodology for undergraduate programs in Brazil
author Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto
author_facet Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto
Miranda, Gilberto José
Alexander , Nicola
Pereira, Janser Moura
author_role author
author2 Miranda, Gilberto José
Alexander , Nicola
Pereira, Janser Moura
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Vivian Duarte Couto
Miranda, Gilberto José
Alexander , Nicola
Pereira, Janser Moura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Value-added model
Learning outcomes
Quality measures
topic Value-added model
Learning outcomes
Quality measures
description Among the quality indicators released by the Brazilian Higher Education Assessment System (Sinaes), the Indicator “Difference between Observed and Expected Performance” (IDD) has the purpose of measuring the contribution of the course to student achievement during undergraduate programs. The research presented here offers a new methodology for calculating the IDD (Model IDD-VDCF), examining the philosophical and statistical underpinnings of quality measures, focusing on those that capture the value-added as a student achievement growth. The survey included a sample of 30,668 students, from 911 accounting undergraduate programs in Brazil. The insertion of control variables (at the student and at the institution level) reduced the bias of the IDD estimate associated with the student's selection in specific Accounting Sciences courses. The results call attention to the need to consider the students' learning context when one wants to compare the performance between institutions based on standardized tests. The major contribution of this work is the development of a measure that disentangles more fully what the contribution of program is to student learning, and what merely is a reflection of the capacity that a student brought to the program.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704
url https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/4704/4407
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2021)
Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 26 n. 2 (2021)
1982-5765
1414-4077
reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron:UNISO
instname_str Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron_str UNISO
institution UNISO
reponame_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
collection Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br
_version_ 1800219609685557248