Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Marcon, A. V., Martins, R. A. [UNESP], Crone, C., Garcia, R. G., Paz, I. C.L.A. [UNESP], Nieto, V. M.O.S., Odakura, A. M., Braz, J. M., Caldara, F. R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN19351
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199149
Resumo: Context: Animals in situations of stress and constant fear exhibit unwanted behaviours for production. Pigs that are afraid of humans tend to associate any management as stressful. The use of environment enrichment for pigs may help to alleviate anxiety and fear, and hence reduce unwanted behaviours during handling. However, provision of appropriate enrichment presents challenges such as the rapid loss of interest in objects by animals. Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of different environmental enrichment strategies on the behaviour of pigs at the nursery stage, maintenance of animal interest in the enrichment objects, and their reflexes when faced with emotionally negative situations. Methods: Piglets (n = 425) were assigned in a completely randomised design with five treatments and five replicates per treatment (17 animal per replicate). The treatments employed were: control, no enriching objects in the environment; WB, wooden box with popcorn and wood shavings; PT, objects made of plastic tubing; WB and PT concurrently; and WB or PT on alternate days. Behavioural observations were made over 10 days for 8 h each day, divided into four periods of 2 h. Piglets from enriched (n = 10) and non-enriched (n = 10) environments were subjected to three fear tests (human approach, novel object and novel arena). Key results: No significant (P > 0.05) effect was found for the type of enrichment provided or strategy adopted (concurrent vs alternating) on the time piglets interacted with the enrichment objects. Animals kept in an environment with no stimulus had higher frequency (P < 0.05) of undesirable behaviours than those with enrichment, regardless of enrichment type or strategy adopted. Piglets reared without enrichment, when isolated in a new environment, had higher frequency of behaviours such as defecating, urinating and attempting escape, as well as more and longer vocalisation events (P < 0.05). Piglets reared in an enriched environment had higher frequency and duration of interaction with a new object, as well as shorter latency time for the first contact with the object (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of enrichment objects in the rearing environment of piglets at the nursery stage reduced undesirable behaviours, suggesting reduced fear and anxiety, and may therefore improve their psychological wellbeing. Implications: Use of enrichment objects during rearing may have implications for alleviation of chronic stress, which leads to constant release of cortisol, an immune suppressor hormone that reduces the health status of the batch and hence production indices.
id UNSP_0b9cf78d7ad9ad4aa9114abad1d0d23e
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199149
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interestbehaviornoveltyswineContext: Animals in situations of stress and constant fear exhibit unwanted behaviours for production. Pigs that are afraid of humans tend to associate any management as stressful. The use of environment enrichment for pigs may help to alleviate anxiety and fear, and hence reduce unwanted behaviours during handling. However, provision of appropriate enrichment presents challenges such as the rapid loss of interest in objects by animals. Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of different environmental enrichment strategies on the behaviour of pigs at the nursery stage, maintenance of animal interest in the enrichment objects, and their reflexes when faced with emotionally negative situations. Methods: Piglets (n = 425) were assigned in a completely randomised design with five treatments and five replicates per treatment (17 animal per replicate). The treatments employed were: control, no enriching objects in the environment; WB, wooden box with popcorn and wood shavings; PT, objects made of plastic tubing; WB and PT concurrently; and WB or PT on alternate days. Behavioural observations were made over 10 days for 8 h each day, divided into four periods of 2 h. Piglets from enriched (n = 10) and non-enriched (n = 10) environments were subjected to three fear tests (human approach, novel object and novel arena). Key results: No significant (P > 0.05) effect was found for the type of enrichment provided or strategy adopted (concurrent vs alternating) on the time piglets interacted with the enrichment objects. Animals kept in an environment with no stimulus had higher frequency (P < 0.05) of undesirable behaviours than those with enrichment, regardless of enrichment type or strategy adopted. Piglets reared without enrichment, when isolated in a new environment, had higher frequency of behaviours such as defecating, urinating and attempting escape, as well as more and longer vocalisation events (P < 0.05). Piglets reared in an enriched environment had higher frequency and duration of interaction with a new object, as well as shorter latency time for the first contact with the object (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of enrichment objects in the rearing environment of piglets at the nursery stage reduced undesirable behaviours, suggesting reduced fear and anxiety, and may therefore improve their psychological wellbeing. Implications: Use of enrichment objects during rearing may have implications for alleviation of chronic stress, which leads to constant release of cortisol, an immune suppressor hormone that reduces the health status of the batch and hence production indices.Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science State University of São Paulo Unesp Campus de Botucatu, Júlio de Mesquita Filho, s/nCollege of Agrarian Sciences Federal University of Grande Dourados, Itahum Highway, Km 12-Unit IIFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Federal University of Mato Grosso Do sul, Av. Costa e Silva, s/nFaculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science State University of São Paulo Unesp Campus de Botucatu, Júlio de Mesquita Filho, s/nUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Grande DouradosFederal University of Mato Grosso Do sulDe Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]Marcon, A. V.Martins, R. A. [UNESP]Crone, C.Garcia, R. G.Paz, I. C.L.A. [UNESP]Nieto, V. M.O.S.Odakura, A. M.Braz, J. M.Caldara, F. R.2020-12-12T01:32:05Z2020-12-12T01:32:05Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN19351Animal Production Science.1836-57871836-0939http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19914910.1071/AN193512-s2.0-8508849932884983472397015590000-0001-6495-731XScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAnimal Production Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T03:22:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/199149Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T03:22:32Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
title Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
spellingShingle Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
De Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]
behavior
novelty
swine
title_short Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
title_full Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
title_fullStr Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
title_full_unstemmed Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
title_sort Environmental enrichment strategies for nursery piglets and efficacy for maintaining interest
author De Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]
author_facet De Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]
Marcon, A. V.
Martins, R. A. [UNESP]
Crone, C.
Garcia, R. G.
Paz, I. C.L.A. [UNESP]
Nieto, V. M.O.S.
Odakura, A. M.
Braz, J. M.
Caldara, F. R.
author_role author
author2 Marcon, A. V.
Martins, R. A. [UNESP]
Crone, C.
Garcia, R. G.
Paz, I. C.L.A. [UNESP]
Nieto, V. M.O.S.
Odakura, A. M.
Braz, J. M.
Caldara, F. R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Federal University of Grande Dourados
Federal University of Mato Grosso Do sul
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Oliveira, G. F. [UNESP]
Marcon, A. V.
Martins, R. A. [UNESP]
Crone, C.
Garcia, R. G.
Paz, I. C.L.A. [UNESP]
Nieto, V. M.O.S.
Odakura, A. M.
Braz, J. M.
Caldara, F. R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv behavior
novelty
swine
topic behavior
novelty
swine
description Context: Animals in situations of stress and constant fear exhibit unwanted behaviours for production. Pigs that are afraid of humans tend to associate any management as stressful. The use of environment enrichment for pigs may help to alleviate anxiety and fear, and hence reduce unwanted behaviours during handling. However, provision of appropriate enrichment presents challenges such as the rapid loss of interest in objects by animals. Aims: The present study evaluated the effects of different environmental enrichment strategies on the behaviour of pigs at the nursery stage, maintenance of animal interest in the enrichment objects, and their reflexes when faced with emotionally negative situations. Methods: Piglets (n = 425) were assigned in a completely randomised design with five treatments and five replicates per treatment (17 animal per replicate). The treatments employed were: control, no enriching objects in the environment; WB, wooden box with popcorn and wood shavings; PT, objects made of plastic tubing; WB and PT concurrently; and WB or PT on alternate days. Behavioural observations were made over 10 days for 8 h each day, divided into four periods of 2 h. Piglets from enriched (n = 10) and non-enriched (n = 10) environments were subjected to three fear tests (human approach, novel object and novel arena). Key results: No significant (P > 0.05) effect was found for the type of enrichment provided or strategy adopted (concurrent vs alternating) on the time piglets interacted with the enrichment objects. Animals kept in an environment with no stimulus had higher frequency (P < 0.05) of undesirable behaviours than those with enrichment, regardless of enrichment type or strategy adopted. Piglets reared without enrichment, when isolated in a new environment, had higher frequency of behaviours such as defecating, urinating and attempting escape, as well as more and longer vocalisation events (P < 0.05). Piglets reared in an enriched environment had higher frequency and duration of interaction with a new object, as well as shorter latency time for the first contact with the object (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of enrichment objects in the rearing environment of piglets at the nursery stage reduced undesirable behaviours, suggesting reduced fear and anxiety, and may therefore improve their psychological wellbeing. Implications: Use of enrichment objects during rearing may have implications for alleviation of chronic stress, which leads to constant release of cortisol, an immune suppressor hormone that reduces the health status of the batch and hence production indices.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T01:32:05Z
2020-12-12T01:32:05Z
2020-01-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN19351
Animal Production Science.
1836-5787
1836-0939
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199149
10.1071/AN19351
2-s2.0-85088499328
8498347239701559
0000-0001-6495-731X
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN19351
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/199149
identifier_str_mv Animal Production Science.
1836-5787
1836-0939
10.1071/AN19351
2-s2.0-85088499328
8498347239701559
0000-0001-6495-731X
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Animal Production Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965059064004608