Predicting beef carcass retail products of Mediterranean buffaloes by real-time ultrasound measures

• Main Author: Jorge, Andre Mendes [UNESP]
• Publication Date: 2007
• Other Authors: Andrighetto, C. [UNESP], De Lima Francisco, C. [UNESP], Polizel Neto, A. [UNESP], De Castro Mourao, R. [UNESP], Bianchini, W. [UNESP], Rodrigues, E. [UNESP], De Amorim Ramos, A. [UNESP]
• Format: Article
• Language: eng
• Source: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.4081%2Fijas.2007.s2.1157; http://www.aspajournal.it/index.php/ijas/article/view/ijas.2007.s2.1157; http://hdl.handle.net/11449/37153
• topic: Mediterranean buffaloes; Carcass retail cut; Ultrasound evaluation

Twenty eight Mediterranean buffaloes bulls were scanned with real-time ultrasound (RTU), slaughtered, and fabricated into retail cuts to determine the potential for ultrasound measures to predict carcass retail yield. Ultrasound measures of fat thickness, ribeye area and rump fat thickness were recorded three to five days prior to slaughter. Carcass measurements were taken, and one side of each carcass was fabricated into retail cuts. Stepwise regression analysis was used to compare possible models for prediction of either kilograms or percent retail product from carcass mesaurements and ultrasound measures. Results indicate that possible prediction models for percent or kilograms of retail products using RTU measures were similar in their predictive power and accuracy when compared to models derived from carcass measurements. Both fat thickness and ribeye area were over-predicted when measured ultrasonically compared to measurements taken on the carcass in the cooler. The mean absolute differences for both traits are larger than the mean differences, indicating that some images were interpreted to be larger and some smaller than actual carcass measurements. Ultrasound measurements of REA and FT had positive correlations with carcass measures of the same traits (r=.96 for REA and r=.99 for FT). Standard errors of prediction currently are being used as the standard to certify ultrasound technicians for accuracy. Regression equations using live weight (LW), rib eye area (REAU) and subcutaneous fat thickness (FTU) between 12(th) and 13 (th) ribs and also over the biceps femoris muscle (FTP8) by ultrasound explained 95% of the variation in the hot carcass weight when measure immediately before slaughter.