Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tahmasebi, Behroz Khalil
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Alebrahim, Mohammad Taghi, Roldan-Gomez, Rafael A., Silveira, Hellen Martins da, Carvalho, Leonardo Bianco de [UNESP], Alcantara-de la Cruz, Ricardo, De Prado, Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160482
Resumo: Glyphosate has been applied in European countries for over a decade between rows in olive groves and grape vineyards to control Conyza species [hairy fleabane (C. bonariensis), horseweed (C. canadensis) and Sumatran fleabane (C. sumatrensis)], however poor control has been observed in recent years. Glyphosate susceptible (GS) or resistant (GR) populations were assayed in each species. In addition, Conyza spp. control with alternative herbicides (alone or in mixture with glyphosate) over two years was also assessed. The GS populations of the three species were controlled with glyphosate field doses (1080 g ae ha(-1)). The GR hairy fleabane, horseweed and Sumatran fleabane populations were 15.0, 15.7 and 19.8 times more resistant, respectively, than their respective GS population. The shikimic accumulation of GS populations was 4-6 times higher compared with the GR Conyza populations, confirming the glyphosate resistance of the latter ones. The increase in the glyphosate dose did not control the GR Conyza populations, despite providing a higher dry growth reduction. Glufosinate and flazasulfuron, alone or mixed with glyphosate, were the effective options to control GR and GS populations of hairy fleabane and Sumatran fleabane. However, the GR horseweed population might have evolved multiple resistance to glyphosate and flazasulfuron in Hungary. The other herbicides (PSI, auxinic and PPO) showed an additive effect together with the control provided by glyphosate in the GS and GR populations; however generally, these herbicides could be applied alone at the rosette stage. Effective herbicides with modes of action different from glyphosate, except flazasulfuron for controlling horseweed, should be used to delay the selection of herbicide resistance in perennial crops in Europe.
id UNSP_1c67fe56047f2ec6a5e5af4682f1efcf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/160482
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistanceAlternative weed controlConyza genusChemical controlGlyphosate resistancePerennial cropsGlyphosate has been applied in European countries for over a decade between rows in olive groves and grape vineyards to control Conyza species [hairy fleabane (C. bonariensis), horseweed (C. canadensis) and Sumatran fleabane (C. sumatrensis)], however poor control has been observed in recent years. Glyphosate susceptible (GS) or resistant (GR) populations were assayed in each species. In addition, Conyza spp. control with alternative herbicides (alone or in mixture with glyphosate) over two years was also assessed. The GS populations of the three species were controlled with glyphosate field doses (1080 g ae ha(-1)). The GR hairy fleabane, horseweed and Sumatran fleabane populations were 15.0, 15.7 and 19.8 times more resistant, respectively, than their respective GS population. The shikimic accumulation of GS populations was 4-6 times higher compared with the GR Conyza populations, confirming the glyphosate resistance of the latter ones. The increase in the glyphosate dose did not control the GR Conyza populations, despite providing a higher dry growth reduction. Glufosinate and flazasulfuron, alone or mixed with glyphosate, were the effective options to control GR and GS populations of hairy fleabane and Sumatran fleabane. However, the GR horseweed population might have evolved multiple resistance to glyphosate and flazasulfuron in Hungary. The other herbicides (PSI, auxinic and PPO) showed an additive effect together with the control provided by glyphosate in the GS and GR populations; however generally, these herbicides could be applied alone at the rosette stage. Effective herbicides with modes of action different from glyphosate, except flazasulfuron for controlling horseweed, should be used to delay the selection of herbicide resistance in perennial crops in Europe.Asociacion Agroquimicos y Medio Ambiente (Spain)Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Dept Agron & Plant Breeding, Ardebil 5613156491, IranUniv Cordoba, Dept Agr Chem & Edaphol, E-14071 Cordoba, SpainUniv Fed Vicosa, Dept Fitotecnia, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, BrazilUniv Fed Vicosa, Dept Entomol BIOAGRO, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, BrazilElsevier B.V.Univ Mohaghegh ArdabiliUniv CordobaUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Tahmasebi, Behroz KhalilAlebrahim, Mohammad TaghiRoldan-Gomez, Rafael A.Silveira, Hellen Martins daCarvalho, Leonardo Bianco de [UNESP]Alcantara-de la Cruz, RicardoDe Prado, Rafael2018-11-26T16:04:39Z2018-11-26T16:04:39Z2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article350-355application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021Crop Protection. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 112, p. 350-355, 2018.0261-2194http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16048210.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021WOS:000440961000047WOS000440961000047.pdf5570172701557172[4]Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCrop Protection0,820info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-13T06:03:39Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/160482Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-10-13T06:03:39Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
title Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
spellingShingle Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
Tahmasebi, Behroz Khalil
Alternative weed control
Conyza genus
Chemical control
Glyphosate resistance
Perennial crops
title_short Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
title_full Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
title_fullStr Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
title_sort Effectiveness of alternative herbicides on three Conyza species from Europe with and without glyphosate resistance
author Tahmasebi, Behroz Khalil
author_facet Tahmasebi, Behroz Khalil
Alebrahim, Mohammad Taghi
Roldan-Gomez, Rafael A.
Silveira, Hellen Martins da
Carvalho, Leonardo Bianco de [UNESP]
Alcantara-de la Cruz, Ricardo
De Prado, Rafael
author_role author
author2 Alebrahim, Mohammad Taghi
Roldan-Gomez, Rafael A.
Silveira, Hellen Martins da
Carvalho, Leonardo Bianco de [UNESP]
Alcantara-de la Cruz, Ricardo
De Prado, Rafael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili
Univ Cordoba
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tahmasebi, Behroz Khalil
Alebrahim, Mohammad Taghi
Roldan-Gomez, Rafael A.
Silveira, Hellen Martins da
Carvalho, Leonardo Bianco de [UNESP]
Alcantara-de la Cruz, Ricardo
De Prado, Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative weed control
Conyza genus
Chemical control
Glyphosate resistance
Perennial crops
topic Alternative weed control
Conyza genus
Chemical control
Glyphosate resistance
Perennial crops
description Glyphosate has been applied in European countries for over a decade between rows in olive groves and grape vineyards to control Conyza species [hairy fleabane (C. bonariensis), horseweed (C. canadensis) and Sumatran fleabane (C. sumatrensis)], however poor control has been observed in recent years. Glyphosate susceptible (GS) or resistant (GR) populations were assayed in each species. In addition, Conyza spp. control with alternative herbicides (alone or in mixture with glyphosate) over two years was also assessed. The GS populations of the three species were controlled with glyphosate field doses (1080 g ae ha(-1)). The GR hairy fleabane, horseweed and Sumatran fleabane populations were 15.0, 15.7 and 19.8 times more resistant, respectively, than their respective GS population. The shikimic accumulation of GS populations was 4-6 times higher compared with the GR Conyza populations, confirming the glyphosate resistance of the latter ones. The increase in the glyphosate dose did not control the GR Conyza populations, despite providing a higher dry growth reduction. Glufosinate and flazasulfuron, alone or mixed with glyphosate, were the effective options to control GR and GS populations of hairy fleabane and Sumatran fleabane. However, the GR horseweed population might have evolved multiple resistance to glyphosate and flazasulfuron in Hungary. The other herbicides (PSI, auxinic and PPO) showed an additive effect together with the control provided by glyphosate in the GS and GR populations; however generally, these herbicides could be applied alone at the rosette stage. Effective herbicides with modes of action different from glyphosate, except flazasulfuron for controlling horseweed, should be used to delay the selection of herbicide resistance in perennial crops in Europe.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-26T16:04:39Z
2018-11-26T16:04:39Z
2018-10-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021
Crop Protection. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 112, p. 350-355, 2018.
0261-2194
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160482
10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021
WOS:000440961000047
WOS000440961000047.pdf
5570172701557172[4]
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/160482
identifier_str_mv Crop Protection. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 112, p. 350-355, 2018.
0261-2194
10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.021
WOS:000440961000047
WOS000440961000047.pdf
5570172701557172[4]
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Crop Protection
0,820
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 350-355
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964539872083968