Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Canton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Luvizutto, Gustavo José, Filho, Pedro Tadao Hamamoto [UNESP], Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP], Modolo, Gabriel Pinheiro [UNESP], Trindade, André Petean [UNESP], Bazan, Rodrigo [UNESP], de Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210142
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234196
Resumo: Background: Neuroimaging is widely used for diagnosis and treatment of stroke. However, little is known about whether the radiation doses received by patients comply with international safety guidelines. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective radiation dose received while in hospital for stroke and analyze its safety according to current guidelines. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 109 patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to evaluate stroke severity, the Bamford clinical classification was used for topography, and the TOAST classification was used for etiology. The computed tomography dose index and size-specific dose estimates were used to calculate the effective radiation dose (ERD) received while in hospital. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ERD received by thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the data with a 95% confidence interval. Results: During the study period, the median ERD received was 10.9 mSv. Length of stay was not associated with radiation exposure. No differences were demonstrated in ERD according to stroke etiology or Bamford clinical classification. Patients who had CT perfusion (only or in addition to CT or angiotomography) received the highest ERD (46.5 mSv) and the difference compared to those who did not (10.8 mSv) was statistically significant (p<0.001). No differences were found in the ERD between thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. There was no correlation between ERD while in hospital and stroke severity. Conclusions: According to the current national guidelines, the protocol for examining images at our stroke unit is safe in terms of the ERD received by the patient while in hospital. There was no difference in the ERD received by patients stratified by thrombolytic treatment or stroke severity.
id UNSP_1d8313010c2ad1ba87e756ba7441cd13
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234196
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalizationSegurança da dose de radiação efetiva recebida durante internação por acidente vascular cerebralCT scanRadiationRadioprotectionStrokeBackground: Neuroimaging is widely used for diagnosis and treatment of stroke. However, little is known about whether the radiation doses received by patients comply with international safety guidelines. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective radiation dose received while in hospital for stroke and analyze its safety according to current guidelines. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 109 patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to evaluate stroke severity, the Bamford clinical classification was used for topography, and the TOAST classification was used for etiology. The computed tomography dose index and size-specific dose estimates were used to calculate the effective radiation dose (ERD) received while in hospital. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ERD received by thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the data with a 95% confidence interval. Results: During the study period, the median ERD received was 10.9 mSv. Length of stay was not associated with radiation exposure. No differences were demonstrated in ERD according to stroke etiology or Bamford clinical classification. Patients who had CT perfusion (only or in addition to CT or angiotomography) received the highest ERD (46.5 mSv) and the difference compared to those who did not (10.8 mSv) was statistically significant (p<0.001). No differences were found in the ERD between thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. There was no correlation between ERD while in hospital and stroke severity. Conclusions: According to the current national guidelines, the protocol for examining images at our stroke unit is safe in terms of the ERD received by the patient while in hospital. There was no difference in the ERD received by patients stratified by thrombolytic treatment or stroke severity.Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, SPDepartamento de Fisioterapia Aplicada Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro – UFTM, MGUniversidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro – UFTMCanton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]Luvizutto, Gustavo JoséFilho, Pedro Tadao Hamamoto [UNESP]Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP]Modolo, Gabriel Pinheiro [UNESP]Trindade, André Petean [UNESP]Bazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]de Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]2022-05-01T13:57:33Z2022-05-01T13:57:33Z2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210142Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, v. 20.1677-73011677-5449http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23419610.1590/1677-5449.2101422-s2.0-85125218625Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJornal Vascular Brasileiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-01T13:57:33Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234196Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-05-01T13:57:33Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
Segurança da dose de radiação efetiva recebida durante internação por acidente vascular cerebral
title Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
spellingShingle Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
Canton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]
CT scan
Radiation
Radioprotection
Stroke
title_short Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
title_full Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
title_fullStr Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
title_full_unstemmed Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
title_sort Safety of the effective radiation dose received during stroke hospitalization
author Canton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]
author_facet Canton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]
Luvizutto, Gustavo José
Filho, Pedro Tadao Hamamoto [UNESP]
Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP]
Modolo, Gabriel Pinheiro [UNESP]
Trindade, André Petean [UNESP]
Bazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]
de Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Luvizutto, Gustavo José
Filho, Pedro Tadao Hamamoto [UNESP]
Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP]
Modolo, Gabriel Pinheiro [UNESP]
Trindade, André Petean [UNESP]
Bazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]
de Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro – UFTM
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Canton, Gregório Platero [UNESP]
Luvizutto, Gustavo José
Filho, Pedro Tadao Hamamoto [UNESP]
Minicucci, Marcos Ferreira [UNESP]
Modolo, Gabriel Pinheiro [UNESP]
Trindade, André Petean [UNESP]
Bazan, Rodrigo [UNESP]
de Souza, Juli Thomaz [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CT scan
Radiation
Radioprotection
Stroke
topic CT scan
Radiation
Radioprotection
Stroke
description Background: Neuroimaging is widely used for diagnosis and treatment of stroke. However, little is known about whether the radiation doses received by patients comply with international safety guidelines. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effective radiation dose received while in hospital for stroke and analyze its safety according to current guidelines. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 109 patients who were hospitalized and diagnosed with ischemic stroke. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to evaluate stroke severity, the Bamford clinical classification was used for topography, and the TOAST classification was used for etiology. The computed tomography dose index and size-specific dose estimates were used to calculate the effective radiation dose (ERD) received while in hospital. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the ERD received by thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyze the data with a 95% confidence interval. Results: During the study period, the median ERD received was 10.9 mSv. Length of stay was not associated with radiation exposure. No differences were demonstrated in ERD according to stroke etiology or Bamford clinical classification. Patients who had CT perfusion (only or in addition to CT or angiotomography) received the highest ERD (46.5 mSv) and the difference compared to those who did not (10.8 mSv) was statistically significant (p<0.001). No differences were found in the ERD between thrombolysed and non-thrombolysed patients. There was no correlation between ERD while in hospital and stroke severity. Conclusions: According to the current national guidelines, the protocol for examining images at our stroke unit is safe in terms of the ERD received by the patient while in hospital. There was no difference in the ERD received by patients stratified by thrombolytic treatment or stroke severity.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
2022-05-01T13:57:33Z
2022-05-01T13:57:33Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210142
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, v. 20.
1677-7301
1677-5449
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234196
10.1590/1677-5449.210142
2-s2.0-85125218625
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210142
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234196
identifier_str_mv Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, v. 20.
1677-7301
1677-5449
10.1590/1677-5449.210142
2-s2.0-85125218625
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792962038403694592