Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Harter, C. J. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Lima, L. D. [UNESP], Silva, H. G. O. [UNESP], Castagnino, D. S. [UNESP], Rivera, A. R. [UNESP], Resende, K. T. [UNESP], Teixeira, I. A. M. A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1490
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165770
Resumo: It has been suggested that maintenance requirements are similar among animals of different physiological stages; however, important physiological changes occur in the maternal body during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the energy and protein requirements for the maintenance of pregnant dairy goats and to estimate their efficiency of energy and protein utilization for maintenance and pregnancy. We used 66 multiparous pregnant goats having 49.0 +/- 1.59 kg initial BW (around the third or fourth parturition) arranged in a randomized block design with a 3 x 3 factorial scheme including slaughter at different days of pregnancy (DOP; 80, 110, and 140 d) and feed restriction (0, 20, and 40% feed restriction). The comparative slaughter technique was used to estimate energy and protein maintenance requirements. Goats slaughtered at 140 DOP were subjected to digestibility trials at around 80, 110, and 140 DOP to estimate diet metabolizability and N balance (NBAL). Metabolizability decreased with feed restriction and was 63.3 +/- 2.16, 55.7 +/- 2.35, and 58.2 +/- 2.30% at 0, 20, and 40% of feed restriction, respectively (P < 0.01). There was no effect of DOP on NEm or the requirements of ME for maintenance (MEm), which were 197 and 315 kJ/kg empty body weight (EBW) 0.75, respectively, and the efficiency of ME utilization for maintenance (k(mE)) was 0.63. Similarly, DOP did not affect thedaily net protein requirements for maintenance (NPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique (1.38 +/- 0.512 g/kg EBW0.75; P = 0.003) or the NPm estimated using NBAL (2.49 +/- 0.594 g/kg EBW0.75; P < 0.01). The MP requirement for maintenance (MPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique was not affected by DOP and was 3.22 g MP/kg EBW0.75 (P < 0.01). The efficiency of MP utilization for maintenance (k(mP)) was 0.43. The efficiency of ME utilization for pregnancy (k(pE)) increased with the progress of pregnancy and was 0.058, 0.10, and 0.19 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. Similarly, the efficiency of MP utilization for pregnancy (k(pP)) increased with DOP and was 0.12, 0.21, and 0.43 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. There was no evidence that pregnancy affected NEm, MEm, NPm, and MPm or k(mE) and k(mP), which were also unaffected by DOP. However, kpE and kpP increased with pregnancy progress as a response to the physiological changes that pregnant females are subjected to.
id UNSP_2a328e0a2853129e5bf8ebd404bcbdb4
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/165770
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of useefficiencymetabolizable energymetabolizable proteinnutritional demandsIt has been suggested that maintenance requirements are similar among animals of different physiological stages; however, important physiological changes occur in the maternal body during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the energy and protein requirements for the maintenance of pregnant dairy goats and to estimate their efficiency of energy and protein utilization for maintenance and pregnancy. We used 66 multiparous pregnant goats having 49.0 +/- 1.59 kg initial BW (around the third or fourth parturition) arranged in a randomized block design with a 3 x 3 factorial scheme including slaughter at different days of pregnancy (DOP; 80, 110, and 140 d) and feed restriction (0, 20, and 40% feed restriction). The comparative slaughter technique was used to estimate energy and protein maintenance requirements. Goats slaughtered at 140 DOP were subjected to digestibility trials at around 80, 110, and 140 DOP to estimate diet metabolizability and N balance (NBAL). Metabolizability decreased with feed restriction and was 63.3 +/- 2.16, 55.7 +/- 2.35, and 58.2 +/- 2.30% at 0, 20, and 40% of feed restriction, respectively (P < 0.01). There was no effect of DOP on NEm or the requirements of ME for maintenance (MEm), which were 197 and 315 kJ/kg empty body weight (EBW) 0.75, respectively, and the efficiency of ME utilization for maintenance (k(mE)) was 0.63. Similarly, DOP did not affect thedaily net protein requirements for maintenance (NPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique (1.38 +/- 0.512 g/kg EBW0.75; P = 0.003) or the NPm estimated using NBAL (2.49 +/- 0.594 g/kg EBW0.75; P < 0.01). The MP requirement for maintenance (MPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique was not affected by DOP and was 3.22 g MP/kg EBW0.75 (P < 0.01). The efficiency of MP utilization for maintenance (k(mP)) was 0.43. The efficiency of ME utilization for pregnancy (k(pE)) increased with the progress of pregnancy and was 0.058, 0.10, and 0.19 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. Similarly, the efficiency of MP utilization for pregnancy (k(pP)) increased with DOP and was 0.12, 0.21, and 0.43 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. There was no evidence that pregnancy affected NEm, MEm, NPm, and MPm or k(mE) and k(mP), which were also unaffected by DOP. However, kpE and kpP increased with pregnancy progress as a response to the physiological changes that pregnant females are subjected to.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2013/04758-5FAPESP: 2009/10125-0FAPESP: 2007/58239-8Amer Soc Animal ScienceUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Harter, C. J. [UNESP]Lima, L. D. [UNESP]Silva, H. G. O. [UNESP]Castagnino, D. S. [UNESP]Rivera, A. R. [UNESP]Resende, K. T. [UNESP]Teixeira, I. A. M. A. [UNESP]2018-11-28T19:21:53Z2018-11-28T19:21:53Z2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article4181-4193application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1490Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 95, n. 9, p. 4181-4193, 2017.0021-8812http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16577010.2527/jas2017.1490WOS:000410813900036WOS000410813900036.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Animal Science0,848info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-06T06:09:46Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/165770Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-06T06:09:46Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
title Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
spellingShingle Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
Harter, C. J. [UNESP]
efficiency
metabolizable energy
metabolizable protein
nutritional demands
title_short Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
title_full Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
title_fullStr Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
title_full_unstemmed Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
title_sort Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of dairy goats during pregnancy and their efficiencies of use
author Harter, C. J. [UNESP]
author_facet Harter, C. J. [UNESP]
Lima, L. D. [UNESP]
Silva, H. G. O. [UNESP]
Castagnino, D. S. [UNESP]
Rivera, A. R. [UNESP]
Resende, K. T. [UNESP]
Teixeira, I. A. M. A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lima, L. D. [UNESP]
Silva, H. G. O. [UNESP]
Castagnino, D. S. [UNESP]
Rivera, A. R. [UNESP]
Resende, K. T. [UNESP]
Teixeira, I. A. M. A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Harter, C. J. [UNESP]
Lima, L. D. [UNESP]
Silva, H. G. O. [UNESP]
Castagnino, D. S. [UNESP]
Rivera, A. R. [UNESP]
Resende, K. T. [UNESP]
Teixeira, I. A. M. A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv efficiency
metabolizable energy
metabolizable protein
nutritional demands
topic efficiency
metabolizable energy
metabolizable protein
nutritional demands
description It has been suggested that maintenance requirements are similar among animals of different physiological stages; however, important physiological changes occur in the maternal body during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the energy and protein requirements for the maintenance of pregnant dairy goats and to estimate their efficiency of energy and protein utilization for maintenance and pregnancy. We used 66 multiparous pregnant goats having 49.0 +/- 1.59 kg initial BW (around the third or fourth parturition) arranged in a randomized block design with a 3 x 3 factorial scheme including slaughter at different days of pregnancy (DOP; 80, 110, and 140 d) and feed restriction (0, 20, and 40% feed restriction). The comparative slaughter technique was used to estimate energy and protein maintenance requirements. Goats slaughtered at 140 DOP were subjected to digestibility trials at around 80, 110, and 140 DOP to estimate diet metabolizability and N balance (NBAL). Metabolizability decreased with feed restriction and was 63.3 +/- 2.16, 55.7 +/- 2.35, and 58.2 +/- 2.30% at 0, 20, and 40% of feed restriction, respectively (P < 0.01). There was no effect of DOP on NEm or the requirements of ME for maintenance (MEm), which were 197 and 315 kJ/kg empty body weight (EBW) 0.75, respectively, and the efficiency of ME utilization for maintenance (k(mE)) was 0.63. Similarly, DOP did not affect thedaily net protein requirements for maintenance (NPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique (1.38 +/- 0.512 g/kg EBW0.75; P = 0.003) or the NPm estimated using NBAL (2.49 +/- 0.594 g/kg EBW0.75; P < 0.01). The MP requirement for maintenance (MPm) estimated using the comparative slaughter technique was not affected by DOP and was 3.22 g MP/kg EBW0.75 (P < 0.01). The efficiency of MP utilization for maintenance (k(mP)) was 0.43. The efficiency of ME utilization for pregnancy (k(pE)) increased with the progress of pregnancy and was 0.058, 0.10, and 0.19 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. Similarly, the efficiency of MP utilization for pregnancy (k(pP)) increased with DOP and was 0.12, 0.21, and 0.43 at 80, 110, and 140 DOP, respectively. There was no evidence that pregnancy affected NEm, MEm, NPm, and MPm or k(mE) and k(mP), which were also unaffected by DOP. However, kpE and kpP increased with pregnancy progress as a response to the physiological changes that pregnant females are subjected to.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
2018-11-28T19:21:53Z
2018-11-28T19:21:53Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1490
Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 95, n. 9, p. 4181-4193, 2017.
0021-8812
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165770
10.2527/jas2017.1490
WOS:000410813900036
WOS000410813900036.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1490
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/165770
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 95, n. 9, p. 4181-4193, 2017.
0021-8812
10.2527/jas2017.1490
WOS:000410813900036
WOS000410813900036.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Animal Science
0,848
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 4181-4193
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Animal Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Amer Soc Animal Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789625983434752