EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Goncalves, C. G., Scarano, M. C. [UNESP], Pereira, M. R. R., Martins, D. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184070
Resumo: The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha(-1)) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter acctunulat ion of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha(-1) dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate.
id UNSP_328b20ccd09e0199d38529a582b4d4b0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184070
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIALheibicidewater deficitweedPanicum maximumThe action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha(-1)) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter acctunulat ion of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha(-1) dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate.Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilAuburn Univ, Auburn, AL USAFac Tecnol Fatec, Capao Bonito, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Jaboticabal, SP, BrazilUniv Federal VicosaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Auburn UnivFac Tecnol FatecSilva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]Goncalves, C. G.Scarano, M. C. [UNESP]Pereira, M. R. R.Martins, D. [UNESP]2019-10-03T18:19:43Z2019-10-03T18:19:43Z2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article12application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121Planta Daninha. Vicosa: Univ Federal Vicosa, v. 36, 12 p., 2018.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18407010.1590/S0100-83582018360100121S0100-83582018000100320WOS:000448835000001S0100-83582018000100320.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-10T06:08:15Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/184070Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-10T06:08:15Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
title EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
spellingShingle EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
Silva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]
heibicide
water deficit
weed
Panicum maximum
title_short EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
title_full EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
title_fullStr EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
title_sort EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON GUINEAGRASS SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SOIL WATER POTENTIAL
author Silva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]
author_facet Silva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]
Goncalves, C. G.
Scarano, M. C. [UNESP]
Pereira, M. R. R.
Martins, D. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Goncalves, C. G.
Scarano, M. C. [UNESP]
Pereira, M. R. R.
Martins, D. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Auburn Univ
Fac Tecnol Fatec
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Jr, A. C. [UNESP]
Goncalves, C. G.
Scarano, M. C. [UNESP]
Pereira, M. R. R.
Martins, D. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv heibicide
water deficit
weed
Panicum maximum
topic heibicide
water deficit
weed
Panicum maximum
description The action of herbicides on weeds that develop under water deficit can be compromised, because the routes of penetration of hydrophilic herbicides are reduced due to the lower hydration of the cuticle in these plants. Moreover, hydrophobic compounds found in the epicuticular wax coating of plants under water stress, hinder the penetration of hydrophilic compounds. This study evaluated the control efficiency of glyphosate on guineagrass plants when submitted to different water deficits. The study was conducted in a greenhouse, and treatments were composed of guineagrass plants submitted to three soil water conditions [low water deficit (13%), intermediate water deficit (10%) and high water restriction (8%)], three doses of glyphosate (0.0, 270.0 and 540.0 g ha(-1)) and two phenological stages of plant development (4-6 leaves and 1-3 tillers). The water management started when plants presented two developed leaves. Visual evaluations were performed 7, 14, 21 and 35 days after the application of the herbicide; the morpho-physiological parameters of the specific leaf area, stomatal conductance and the difference between the environment temperature and the leaf temperature on the day of the herbicide application were also analyzed at the end of the study, as well as the dry matter of shoot and root. With the increase of the water restriction, there was a decrease in the analyzed morpho-physiological parameters, as well as in the dry matter acctunulat ion of the shoot and roots of the studied plants. Plant control was more efficient when a 540 g ha(-1) dose of glyphosate was applied, and when they were controlled at their vegetative stage of 1-3 tiller, and with a water management of 13%. It is possible to state that guineagrass under water restriction have less control efficacy when treated with glyphosate.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
2019-10-03T18:19:43Z
2019-10-03T18:19:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121
Planta Daninha. Vicosa: Univ Federal Vicosa, v. 36, 12 p., 2018.
0100-8358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184070
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121
S0100-83582018000100320
WOS:000448835000001
S0100-83582018000100320.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/184070
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha. Vicosa: Univ Federal Vicosa, v. 36, 12 p., 2018.
0100-8358
10.1590/S0100-83582018360100121
S0100-83582018000100320
WOS:000448835000001
S0100-83582018000100320.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 12
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Vicosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Vicosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964878528577536