Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2002
Outros Autores: Do Amaral, José Luiz Gomes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224508
Resumo: Background and Objectives - Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. Methods - After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. Results - Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. Conclusions - Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent.
id UNSP_3d2eb2d6267ffe4bc975e178d5714fd2
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224508
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivoClinical experience with sedatives in the intensive care unit. A retrospective studyIntensive CareSedationBackground and Objectives - Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. Methods - After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. Results - Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. Conclusions - Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent.Depto. Anestesiologia da FMB-UNESP, Distrito de Rubião Junior, 18618-970 Botucatu, SPDisciplina de Anestesiologia Dor Ter. Inten. Cir. EPM/UNIFESP, Botucatu, SPDepto. Anestesiologia da FMB-UNESP, Distrito de Rubião Junior, 18618-970 Botucatu, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]Do Amaral, José Luiz Gomes2022-04-28T19:56:58Z2022-04-28T19:56:58Z2002-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article747-755Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002.0034-7094http://hdl.handle.net/11449/2245082-s2.0-17144451752Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporengRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:56:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/224508Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462022-04-28T19:56:58Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
Clinical experience with sedatives in the intensive care unit. A retrospective study
title Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
spellingShingle Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]
Intensive Care
Sedation
title_short Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
title_full Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
title_fullStr Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
title_full_unstemmed Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
title_sort Experiência clínica com o uso de sedativos em terapia intensiva. Estudo retrospectivo
author Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]
author_facet Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]
Do Amaral, José Luiz Gomes
author_role author
author2 Do Amaral, José Luiz Gomes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues Jr., Geraldo Rolim [UNESP]
Do Amaral, José Luiz Gomes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Intensive Care
Sedation
topic Intensive Care
Sedation
description Background and Objectives - Among the most frequent indications for Intensive Care Unit patients sedation, one may mention artificial ventilation installation and maintenance, anxiety and uncomfortable or painful procedures. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating most common sedation indications and techniques for severe patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM/UNIFESP) during an 11-month period. Methods - After excluding patients remaining in the ICU for less than 24 hours and those without the necessary evaluation to determine their severity index (APACHE II), the sample was reduced to 307 patients. Most common techniques, sedation indications and neuromuscular blockers association were evaluated. Results - Sedation was administered to 37.4% of patients. Psychiatric disorders, such as delirium, agitation, fear and anxiety, were some indications for sedation and corresponded to 25.77% of all indications. Most ventilated patients also needed sedative agents and mechanical ventilation installation and maintenance represented most indications, or approximately 57.73% of all sedated patients. Procedures, such as tracheal intubation and bronchoscopy, represented 11.34% of all indications and metabolic control (barbiturate coma and tetanus) represented 5.15% of the cases. Most common sedative techniques included opioids alone or associated to benzodiazepines. In this study, fentanyl alone was used in 58% of the cases, and fentanyl plus midazolam in 21.64% of patients. Haloperidol, diazepam, propofol and thiopental added up 19.5%. Neuromuscular blockers were used in 22.7% of mechanically in ventilated patients. Conclusions - Sedation is a common therapeutic resource for intensive care and is widely used to help mechanical ventilation and to treat psychiatric disorders. Fentanyl, alone or in association with midazolam, was the most widely used agent.
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-11-01
2022-04-28T19:56:58Z
2022-04-28T19:56:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002.
0034-7094
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224508
2-s2.0-17144451752
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 52, n. 6, p. 747-755, 2002.
0034-7094
2-s2.0-17144451752
url http://hdl.handle.net/11449/224508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 747-755
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797790069012037632