Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Gustavo A.
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Santos, Leonardo D. T., Ferreira, Guilherme A. de P., Cruz, Leandro R. da [UNESP], Machado, Vitor D., Rocha, Leonardo M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185129
Resumo: Variations in environmental conditions, such as the availability of light, can affect the efficacy of herbicides because they alter the biological characteristics of plants including those that are related to the plant's sensitivity to herbicides. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the influence of environments with different light availabilities, and of the application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl (separately or in combination) on the morphophysiology and control of Macroptilium atropurpureum. An experimental design of randomized blocks with five replicates was used, with treatments arranged in a split-plot design. The plots were composed of three levels of shading (full sunlight, 50% shading, and 70% shading); within each plot there were sub-plots, one for each of the two herbicides (glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl), used either separately or in combination. The doses of gtyphosate + carfentrazone- ethyl applied in the treatments were 0+40 g ha(-1) of carfentrazone-ethyl, 1.440+0 g ha(-1) of glyphosate, 1.080+30 g ha(-1 )of glyphosate + carfentrazone-ethyl, and there was an additional - treatment that did not include the application of an herbicide. Plants of M. atropurpureum cultivated under shading exhibited higher sensitivity to the herbicides, greater leaflet area, and lower photosynthetic rates than plants cultivated under full sunlight conditions. Under shading, both herbicides applied separately or in combination were effective in controlling M. atropurpureum, which indicates a greater susceptibility of this species to these herbicides in environments with light restriction. The species was tolerant to the two tested herbicides, used either alone or in combination, when grown under full sunlight conditions.
id UNSP_3d8c4ee8caa2a94fd814f2899ce04b5f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185129
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureumphysiologysiratrophotosynthetic rateleaf areaVariations in environmental conditions, such as the availability of light, can affect the efficacy of herbicides because they alter the biological characteristics of plants including those that are related to the plant's sensitivity to herbicides. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the influence of environments with different light availabilities, and of the application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl (separately or in combination) on the morphophysiology and control of Macroptilium atropurpureum. An experimental design of randomized blocks with five replicates was used, with treatments arranged in a split-plot design. The plots were composed of three levels of shading (full sunlight, 50% shading, and 70% shading); within each plot there were sub-plots, one for each of the two herbicides (glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl), used either separately or in combination. The doses of gtyphosate + carfentrazone- ethyl applied in the treatments were 0+40 g ha(-1) of carfentrazone-ethyl, 1.440+0 g ha(-1) of glyphosate, 1.080+30 g ha(-1 )of glyphosate + carfentrazone-ethyl, and there was an additional - treatment that did not include the application of an herbicide. Plants of M. atropurpureum cultivated under shading exhibited higher sensitivity to the herbicides, greater leaflet area, and lower photosynthetic rates than plants cultivated under full sunlight conditions. Under shading, both herbicides applied separately or in combination were effective in controlling M. atropurpureum, which indicates a greater susceptibility of this species to these herbicides in environments with light restriction. The species was tolerant to the two tested herbicides, used either alone or in combination, when grown under full sunlight conditions.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Inst Ciencias Agr, Montes Claros, MG, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Meihoramento & Prod Vegetal, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Minas Gerais, Montes Claros, MG, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Fac Ciencias Agron, Dept Meihoramento & Prod Vegetal, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Federal Campina GrandeUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Costa, Gustavo A.Santos, Leonardo D. T.Ferreira, Guilherme A. de P.Cruz, Leandro R. da [UNESP]Machado, Vitor D.Rocha, Leonardo M.2019-10-04T12:32:58Z2019-10-04T12:32:58Z2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article819-824application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 22, n. 12, p. 819-824, 2018.1807-1929http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18512910.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824S1415-43662018001200819WOS:000451644600002S1415-43662018001200819.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambientalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T15:59:06Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/185129Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T15:59:06Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
title Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
spellingShingle Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
Costa, Gustavo A.
physiology
siratro
photosynthetic rate
leaf area
title_short Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
title_full Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
title_fullStr Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
title_full_unstemmed Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
title_sort Levels of shading and application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ehyl in the control of Macroptilium atropurpureum
author Costa, Gustavo A.
author_facet Costa, Gustavo A.
Santos, Leonardo D. T.
Ferreira, Guilherme A. de P.
Cruz, Leandro R. da [UNESP]
Machado, Vitor D.
Rocha, Leonardo M.
author_role author
author2 Santos, Leonardo D. T.
Ferreira, Guilherme A. de P.
Cruz, Leandro R. da [UNESP]
Machado, Vitor D.
Rocha, Leonardo M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Gustavo A.
Santos, Leonardo D. T.
Ferreira, Guilherme A. de P.
Cruz, Leandro R. da [UNESP]
Machado, Vitor D.
Rocha, Leonardo M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv physiology
siratro
photosynthetic rate
leaf area
topic physiology
siratro
photosynthetic rate
leaf area
description Variations in environmental conditions, such as the availability of light, can affect the efficacy of herbicides because they alter the biological characteristics of plants including those that are related to the plant's sensitivity to herbicides. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the influence of environments with different light availabilities, and of the application of glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl (separately or in combination) on the morphophysiology and control of Macroptilium atropurpureum. An experimental design of randomized blocks with five replicates was used, with treatments arranged in a split-plot design. The plots were composed of three levels of shading (full sunlight, 50% shading, and 70% shading); within each plot there were sub-plots, one for each of the two herbicides (glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl), used either separately or in combination. The doses of gtyphosate + carfentrazone- ethyl applied in the treatments were 0+40 g ha(-1) of carfentrazone-ethyl, 1.440+0 g ha(-1) of glyphosate, 1.080+30 g ha(-1 )of glyphosate + carfentrazone-ethyl, and there was an additional - treatment that did not include the application of an herbicide. Plants of M. atropurpureum cultivated under shading exhibited higher sensitivity to the herbicides, greater leaflet area, and lower photosynthetic rates than plants cultivated under full sunlight conditions. Under shading, both herbicides applied separately or in combination were effective in controlling M. atropurpureum, which indicates a greater susceptibility of this species to these herbicides in environments with light restriction. The species was tolerant to the two tested herbicides, used either alone or in combination, when grown under full sunlight conditions.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-01
2019-10-04T12:32:58Z
2019-10-04T12:32:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824
Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 22, n. 12, p. 819-824, 2018.
1807-1929
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185129
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824
S1415-43662018001200819
WOS:000451644600002
S1415-43662018001200819.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/185129
identifier_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental. Campina Grande Pb: Univ Federal Campina Grande, v. 22, n. 12, p. 819-824, 2018.
1807-1929
10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n12p819-824
S1415-43662018001200819
WOS:000451644600002
S1415-43662018001200819.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agricola E Ambiental
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 819-824
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Univ Federal Campina Grande
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965579969298432