Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Antuniassi, Ulisses Rocha [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137396
Resumo: The application technology shows many parameters related to the quality of the application, one is the droplet spectrum, which is influenced by the spray nozzles and the adjuvant used. Therefore, the objective of this work was estimate the behavior of the droplet spectrum generated with different nozzles and different adjuvants. The experiment was installed containing four solutions from different type adjuvant dilution, as vegetal oil, mineral oil, surfactant and drift reduction, which were applied with two nozzle, one pre-orifice flat fan (DG 8003 VS) and other of air induction flat fan (AI 8003 VS), totaling 8 treatments with 3 repetitions. The experiment was realized in ideal weather conditions for spraying. The treatments averages were compared using Confidence Interval at 95% probability and the correlations between variables were analyzed using Pearson at 5% of probability. The analysis of droplet spectrum showed different behavior for each adjuvant and nozzle. The surfactant treatment showed VMD superior for all treatments when sprayed with AI nozzles. For the %vol.<100 µm the lowest value found was for the AI nozzle in combination with the surfactant. The significant correlations found for the nozzles AI and DG were negative between VMD and %vol.<100 µm. It can be concluded that the values of DMV and %vol.<100 µm showed that the nozzle with pre-orifice have droplet spectrum more prone to drift. The surfactant showed to be the best drift reduction technique when combined with the AI nozzle.
id UNSP_3e5f30c7cb5c0263b99a2a1f5e7112af
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137396
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverizaçãoDroplet spectrum generated by different adjuvants and spray nozzlesApplication technologyDriftSurfactantTecnologia de aplicaçãoDerivaSurfatanteThe application technology shows many parameters related to the quality of the application, one is the droplet spectrum, which is influenced by the spray nozzles and the adjuvant used. Therefore, the objective of this work was estimate the behavior of the droplet spectrum generated with different nozzles and different adjuvants. The experiment was installed containing four solutions from different type adjuvant dilution, as vegetal oil, mineral oil, surfactant and drift reduction, which were applied with two nozzle, one pre-orifice flat fan (DG 8003 VS) and other of air induction flat fan (AI 8003 VS), totaling 8 treatments with 3 repetitions. The experiment was realized in ideal weather conditions for spraying. The treatments averages were compared using Confidence Interval at 95% probability and the correlations between variables were analyzed using Pearson at 5% of probability. The analysis of droplet spectrum showed different behavior for each adjuvant and nozzle. The surfactant treatment showed VMD superior for all treatments when sprayed with AI nozzles. For the %vol.<100 µm the lowest value found was for the AI nozzle in combination with the surfactant. The significant correlations found for the nozzles AI and DG were negative between VMD and %vol.<100 µm. It can be concluded that the values of DMV and %vol.<100 µm showed that the nozzle with pre-orifice have droplet spectrum more prone to drift. The surfactant showed to be the best drift reduction technique when combined with the AI nozzle.A tecnologia de aplicação apresenta muitos parâmetros relacionados à qualidade da aplicação, um deles é o espectro de gotas, o qual é influenciado pelas pontas de pulverização e pelos adjuvantes utilizados. Portanto, o objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o comportamento do espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes pontas de pulverização e diferentes adjuvantes. O ensaio foi instalado com quatro caldas provenientes da diluição de diferentes tipos de adjuvantes a base de óleo vegetal, óleo mineral, surfatante e redutor de deriva, as quais foram aplicadas com duas pontas de pulverização, sendo uma de jato plano com pré-orifício (DG 8003 VS) e outra de jato plano com indução de ar (AI 8003 VS), totalizando 8 tratamentos com 3 repetições. O trabalho foi realizado em condições climáticas ideais para pulverização. As mé- dias dos tratamentos foram comparadas pelo Intervalo de Confiança, ao nível de 95% de probabilidade e as correlações entre as variáveis do espectro de gotas, através do coeficiente de Pearson a 5% de probabilidade. A análise do espectro de gotas demonstrou diferentes comportamentos para cada tipo de adjuvante e ponta de pulverização. O tratamento com surfatante apresentou DMV superior aos demais tratamentos quando pulverizado com pontas AI. Para a %vol.<100 µm, o menor valor encontrado foi para a ponta AI em combinação com o surfatante. As correlações significativas, encontradas para as pontas DG e AI, foram negativas entre as variáveis DMV e % vol.<100 µm. Pode-se concluir que os valores de DMV e %vol.<100 µm demonstram que a ponta DG tem o espectro de gotas mais sujeito a deriva. O surfatante representou a melhor tecnologia para redução de deriva quando combinado com a ponta AI.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Departamento de Engenharia Rural, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu, Botucatu, Rua José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, Lageado, CEP 18610307, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Departamento de Engenharia Rural, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas de Botucatu, Botucatu, Rua José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, Lageado, CEP 18610307, SP, BrasilUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]Antuniassi, Ulisses Rocha [UNESP]2016-04-01T18:45:29Z2016-04-01T18:45:29Z2012info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article130-142application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142Energia na Agricultura, v. 27, n. 3, p. 130-142, 2012.1808-8759http://hdl.handle.net/11449/13739610.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142ISSN1808-8759-2012-27-03-130-142.pdf9,7548510295485E+015Currículo Lattesreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporEnergia na Agriculturainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T14:01:19Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/137396Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-04-30T14:01:19Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
Droplet spectrum generated by different adjuvants and spray nozzles
title Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
spellingShingle Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]
Application technology
Drift
Surfactant
Tecnologia de aplicação
Deriva
Surfatante
title_short Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
title_full Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
title_fullStr Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
title_full_unstemmed Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
title_sort Espectro de gotas gerado por diferentes adjuvantes e pontas de pulverização
author Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]
author_facet Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]
Antuniassi, Ulisses Rocha [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Antuniassi, Ulisses Rocha [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chechetto, Rodolfo Glauber [UNESP]
Antuniassi, Ulisses Rocha [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Application technology
Drift
Surfactant
Tecnologia de aplicação
Deriva
Surfatante
topic Application technology
Drift
Surfactant
Tecnologia de aplicação
Deriva
Surfatante
description The application technology shows many parameters related to the quality of the application, one is the droplet spectrum, which is influenced by the spray nozzles and the adjuvant used. Therefore, the objective of this work was estimate the behavior of the droplet spectrum generated with different nozzles and different adjuvants. The experiment was installed containing four solutions from different type adjuvant dilution, as vegetal oil, mineral oil, surfactant and drift reduction, which were applied with two nozzle, one pre-orifice flat fan (DG 8003 VS) and other of air induction flat fan (AI 8003 VS), totaling 8 treatments with 3 repetitions. The experiment was realized in ideal weather conditions for spraying. The treatments averages were compared using Confidence Interval at 95% probability and the correlations between variables were analyzed using Pearson at 5% of probability. The analysis of droplet spectrum showed different behavior for each adjuvant and nozzle. The surfactant treatment showed VMD superior for all treatments when sprayed with AI nozzles. For the %vol.<100 µm the lowest value found was for the AI nozzle in combination with the surfactant. The significant correlations found for the nozzles AI and DG were negative between VMD and %vol.<100 µm. It can be concluded that the values of DMV and %vol.<100 µm showed that the nozzle with pre-orifice have droplet spectrum more prone to drift. The surfactant showed to be the best drift reduction technique when combined with the AI nozzle.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
2016-04-01T18:45:29Z
2016-04-01T18:45:29Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142
Energia na Agricultura, v. 27, n. 3, p. 130-142, 2012.
1808-8759
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137396
10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142
ISSN1808-8759-2012-27-03-130-142.pdf
9,7548510295485E+015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/137396
identifier_str_mv Energia na Agricultura, v. 27, n. 3, p. 130-142, 2012.
1808-8759
10.17224/EnergAgric.2012v27n3p130-142
ISSN1808-8759-2012-27-03-130-142.pdf
9,7548510295485E+015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Energia na Agricultura
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 130-142
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Currículo Lattes
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965086388846593