FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Cremasco, Camila P. [UNESP], Putti, Fernando F. [UNESP], Gabriel, Luís R. A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211231
Resumo: The productivity of a crop is related to the water demand inserted in its development. The measurement of water and its optimization directly influences the final costs of crop production for agricultural producers. In this sense, the objective of this study is evaluating the fuzzy modeling in estimating the productivity of the radish crop (fresh phytomass of the tuberous root) affected by different irrigation depths (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%), based on evapotranspiration of the crop (ETc). To measure the results, two fuzzy systems (with triangular and Gaussian membership functions respectively) and a polynomial regression model were developed to perform model validation comparisons. The fuzzy modeling showed a better fit of the data compared to the polynomial regression model, with reduced errors (RMSE with values 6.3 and 6.9 in the fuzzy models versus 8.8 in the regression model) and higher correlation coefficient (0.54 and 0.5 fuzzy versus 0.1 regression). The triangular fuzzy model estimated the best crop yield (31.9 g of fresh phytomass) when using a 100% ETc depth. Also, the curve generated by the fuzzy model accurately represents all the productivity averages in each depth, in addition to this model presenting the smallest errors (compared to the triangular model and the regression model) and the highest R2. However, the Gaussian fuzzy model proved to be more efficient in representing the agronomic reality, as it does not have peaks and valleys, and it is a smooth model in both growth and degrowth.
id UNSP_40072cacb4f3caad1ff86638f08f4a69
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211231
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSISwater optimizationfuzzy logictuberousGaussianThe productivity of a crop is related to the water demand inserted in its development. The measurement of water and its optimization directly influences the final costs of crop production for agricultural producers. In this sense, the objective of this study is evaluating the fuzzy modeling in estimating the productivity of the radish crop (fresh phytomass of the tuberous root) affected by different irrigation depths (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%), based on evapotranspiration of the crop (ETc). To measure the results, two fuzzy systems (with triangular and Gaussian membership functions respectively) and a polynomial regression model were developed to perform model validation comparisons. The fuzzy modeling showed a better fit of the data compared to the polynomial regression model, with reduced errors (RMSE with values 6.3 and 6.9 in the fuzzy models versus 8.8 in the regression model) and higher correlation coefficient (0.54 and 0.5 fuzzy versus 0.1 regression). The triangular fuzzy model estimated the best crop yield (31.9 g of fresh phytomass) when using a 100% ETc depth. Also, the curve generated by the fuzzy model accurately represents all the productivity averages in each depth, in addition to this model presenting the smallest errors (compared to the triangular model and the regression model) and the highest R2. However, the Gaussian fuzzy model proved to be more efficient in representing the agronomic reality, as it does not have peaks and valleys, and it is a smooth model in both growth and degrowth.FFPLRAGFSão Paulo State University, School of AgricultureSão Paulo State University, School of Sciences and EngineeringSão Paulo State University, School of AgricultureSão Paulo State University, School of Sciences and EngineeringFFP: 303923/2018-0LRAGF: 315228/2020-2Associação Brasileira de Engenharia AgrícolaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]Cremasco, Camila P. [UNESP]Putti, Fernando F. [UNESP]Gabriel, Luís R. A. [UNESP]2021-07-14T10:21:14Z2021-07-14T10:21:14Z2021-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article311-318application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 311-318, 2021.0100-69161809-4430http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21123110.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021S0100-69162021000300311S0100-69162021000300311.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEngenharia Agrícolainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-16T06:09:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/211231Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-16T06:09:36Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
title FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
spellingShingle FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]
water optimization
fuzzy logic
tuberous
Gaussian
title_short FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
title_full FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
title_fullStr FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
title_sort FUZZY MODELING OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION DEPTHS ON THE RADISH CROP. PART I: PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS
author Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]
author_facet Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]
Cremasco, Camila P. [UNESP]
Putti, Fernando F. [UNESP]
Gabriel, Luís R. A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Cremasco, Camila P. [UNESP]
Putti, Fernando F. [UNESP]
Gabriel, Luís R. A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Boso, Ana C. M. R. [UNESP]
Cremasco, Camila P. [UNESP]
Putti, Fernando F. [UNESP]
Gabriel, Luís R. A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv water optimization
fuzzy logic
tuberous
Gaussian
topic water optimization
fuzzy logic
tuberous
Gaussian
description The productivity of a crop is related to the water demand inserted in its development. The measurement of water and its optimization directly influences the final costs of crop production for agricultural producers. In this sense, the objective of this study is evaluating the fuzzy modeling in estimating the productivity of the radish crop (fresh phytomass of the tuberous root) affected by different irrigation depths (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125%), based on evapotranspiration of the crop (ETc). To measure the results, two fuzzy systems (with triangular and Gaussian membership functions respectively) and a polynomial regression model were developed to perform model validation comparisons. The fuzzy modeling showed a better fit of the data compared to the polynomial regression model, with reduced errors (RMSE with values 6.3 and 6.9 in the fuzzy models versus 8.8 in the regression model) and higher correlation coefficient (0.54 and 0.5 fuzzy versus 0.1 regression). The triangular fuzzy model estimated the best crop yield (31.9 g of fresh phytomass) when using a 100% ETc depth. Also, the curve generated by the fuzzy model accurately represents all the productivity averages in each depth, in addition to this model presenting the smallest errors (compared to the triangular model and the regression model) and the highest R2. However, the Gaussian fuzzy model proved to be more efficient in representing the agronomic reality, as it does not have peaks and valleys, and it is a smooth model in both growth and degrowth.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-14T10:21:14Z
2021-07-14T10:21:14Z
2021-06-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 311-318, 2021.
0100-6916
1809-4430
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211231
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
S0100-69162021000300311
S0100-69162021000300311.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/211231
identifier_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola. Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, v. 41, n. 3, p. 311-318, 2021.
0100-6916
1809-4430
10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v41n3p311-318/2021
S0100-69162021000300311
S0100-69162021000300311.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 311-318
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789721526534144