Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Corrêa, Camila De Castro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Piña, Sofia Prata [UNESP], Evangelisti, Melania, Villa, Maria Pia, Weber, Silke Anna Theresa [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716569
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206951
Resumo: Introduction  The quality of information on websites about tonsillectomy regarding the knowledge level may be low. Tonsillectomy is a surgical procedure to hypertrophy of the palatine and pharyngeal tonsils. So, it is an invasive procedure with possible complications, which creates insecurity in parents. Significantly, Internet searches have been increased to address possible health concerns, questioning the quality of websites about tonsillectomy. Objective  To evaluate the readability, reliability, and comprehensiveness of the Italian websites dedicated to parental guidance regarding the indications for tonsillectomy in children. Methods  The search engine google.it was used to search the websites. The Gulpease index, which is a widely used readability formula ranging from 0 (difficult) to 100 (easy readability), was employed to evaluate these websites. The Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) was used to assess the quality of information, by taking ethical principles into account, with values ranging from 0 to 13. The content comprehensiveness of the web pages was assessed by assigning points ranging from 1 (very insufficient) to 5 (very satisfying) to each page. A final comparison with previous studies on tonsillectomy published on websites from other countries was performed. Results  Fourteen Italian websites were selected, and the Gulpease index showed a mean average of 40.77 ± 8.45. The mean of the HONcode analysis was 6.00 ± 1.92, in which the principles with the poorest scores were Attribution and Update. As far as the comprehensiveness of the websites is concerned, the resulting mean was 2.57 ± 0.77, in which Indications was the topic with the highest mean, whereas Benefits was the one with the lowest. Conclusion  The Italian websites were characterized by a lower readability level, a middle position regarding ethical principles, and the same (insufficient) comprehensiveness of tonsillectomy when compared with websites from different countries.
id UNSP_483c844fe1296d07c491554ddfe897b0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206951
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Childreninternetpatient informationpatient portalsreadabilitytonsillectomyIntroduction  The quality of information on websites about tonsillectomy regarding the knowledge level may be low. Tonsillectomy is a surgical procedure to hypertrophy of the palatine and pharyngeal tonsils. So, it is an invasive procedure with possible complications, which creates insecurity in parents. Significantly, Internet searches have been increased to address possible health concerns, questioning the quality of websites about tonsillectomy. Objective  To evaluate the readability, reliability, and comprehensiveness of the Italian websites dedicated to parental guidance regarding the indications for tonsillectomy in children. Methods  The search engine google.it was used to search the websites. The Gulpease index, which is a widely used readability formula ranging from 0 (difficult) to 100 (easy readability), was employed to evaluate these websites. The Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) was used to assess the quality of information, by taking ethical principles into account, with values ranging from 0 to 13. The content comprehensiveness of the web pages was assessed by assigning points ranging from 1 (very insufficient) to 5 (very satisfying) to each page. A final comparison with previous studies on tonsillectomy published on websites from other countries was performed. Results  Fourteen Italian websites were selected, and the Gulpease index showed a mean average of 40.77 ± 8.45. The mean of the HONcode analysis was 6.00 ± 1.92, in which the principles with the poorest scores were Attribution and Update. As far as the comprehensiveness of the websites is concerned, the resulting mean was 2.57 ± 0.77, in which Indications was the topic with the highest mean, whereas Benefits was the one with the lowest. Conclusion  The Italian websites were characterized by a lower readability level, a middle position regarding ethical principles, and the same (insufficient) comprehensiveness of tonsillectomy when compared with websites from different countries.Graduation Course of Speech-Language and Hearing Pathology Universidade de BrasíliaGraduation Course of Speech-Language and Hearing Pathology Centro Universitário Planalto Do Distrito Federal (UNIPLAN)Department of Ophthalmology Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Pediatric Sleep Disease Center Child Neurology NESMOS Department School of Medicine and Psychology Sapienza University of Rome Sant'Andrea HospitalCurso de Graduação em Fonoaudiologia Universidade de BrasíliaDepartment of Ophthalmology Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Universidade de Brasília (UnB)Centro Universitário Planalto Do Distrito Federal (UNIPLAN)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Sant'Andrea HospitalCorrêa, Camila De CastroPiña, Sofia Prata [UNESP]Evangelisti, MelaniaVilla, Maria PiaWeber, Silke Anna Theresa [UNESP]2021-06-25T10:46:35Z2021-06-25T10:46:35Z2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716569International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.1809-48641809-9777http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20695110.1055/s-0040-17165692-s2.0-85097446198Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T15:48:30Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/206951Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T15:48:30Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
title Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
spellingShingle Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
Corrêa, Camila De Castro
internet
patient information
patient portals
readability
tonsillectomy
title_short Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
title_full Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
title_fullStr Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
title_full_unstemmed Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
title_sort Quality of the Italian Websites for Parental Guidance on the Indications for Tonsillectomy in Children
author Corrêa, Camila De Castro
author_facet Corrêa, Camila De Castro
Piña, Sofia Prata [UNESP]
Evangelisti, Melania
Villa, Maria Pia
Weber, Silke Anna Theresa [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Piña, Sofia Prata [UNESP]
Evangelisti, Melania
Villa, Maria Pia
Weber, Silke Anna Theresa [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
Centro Universitário Planalto Do Distrito Federal (UNIPLAN)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Sant'Andrea Hospital
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Corrêa, Camila De Castro
Piña, Sofia Prata [UNESP]
Evangelisti, Melania
Villa, Maria Pia
Weber, Silke Anna Theresa [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv internet
patient information
patient portals
readability
tonsillectomy
topic internet
patient information
patient portals
readability
tonsillectomy
description Introduction  The quality of information on websites about tonsillectomy regarding the knowledge level may be low. Tonsillectomy is a surgical procedure to hypertrophy of the palatine and pharyngeal tonsils. So, it is an invasive procedure with possible complications, which creates insecurity in parents. Significantly, Internet searches have been increased to address possible health concerns, questioning the quality of websites about tonsillectomy. Objective  To evaluate the readability, reliability, and comprehensiveness of the Italian websites dedicated to parental guidance regarding the indications for tonsillectomy in children. Methods  The search engine google.it was used to search the websites. The Gulpease index, which is a widely used readability formula ranging from 0 (difficult) to 100 (easy readability), was employed to evaluate these websites. The Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) was used to assess the quality of information, by taking ethical principles into account, with values ranging from 0 to 13. The content comprehensiveness of the web pages was assessed by assigning points ranging from 1 (very insufficient) to 5 (very satisfying) to each page. A final comparison with previous studies on tonsillectomy published on websites from other countries was performed. Results  Fourteen Italian websites were selected, and the Gulpease index showed a mean average of 40.77 ± 8.45. The mean of the HONcode analysis was 6.00 ± 1.92, in which the principles with the poorest scores were Attribution and Update. As far as the comprehensiveness of the websites is concerned, the resulting mean was 2.57 ± 0.77, in which Indications was the topic with the highest mean, whereas Benefits was the one with the lowest. Conclusion  The Italian websites were characterized by a lower readability level, a middle position regarding ethical principles, and the same (insufficient) comprehensiveness of tonsillectomy when compared with websites from different countries.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
2021-06-25T10:46:35Z
2021-06-25T10:46:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716569
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.
1809-4864
1809-9777
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206951
10.1055/s-0040-1716569
2-s2.0-85097446198
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716569
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/206951
identifier_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.
1809-4864
1809-9777
10.1055/s-0040-1716569
2-s2.0-85097446198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1797789685656846336