Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Braz, L. T. [UNESP], Castoldi, R. [UNESP], Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo de conferência
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_22.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70777
Resumo: Two tests were performed. In the first, resistance to Didymella bryoniae was determined for the following genotypes: the pumpkins 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki' and 'Shelper', watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 3a, 5a, 1b, 2b, 3b and 5b, and 'Gherkin' (C. anguria). The plants were inoculated with the fungus during transplanting. The evaluations of the test were performed every 15 d according to a scoring scale adopted by Dusi et al. (1994). The second test examined compatibility among the rootstocks x grafts, and their effects on production. The rootstocks, 5 pumpkins including 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', six watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, and one 'Gherkin', were planted one week before planting of the grafted 'Bônus No. 2' melon. The experiments were carried out with 12 treatments, including the control ('Bônus No. 2') with 3 replications with 14 grafted plants per each replication. For the first test, the first three evaluations (at 15, 30 and 45 d after inoculation) did not show characteristic lesions of stem canker, but progeny 3b was found to be susceptible in evaluations performed at 60 and 75 d after inoculation. Progeny 3a demonstrated intermediate susceptibility, while progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres', and 'Gherkin', showed resistance to Didymella bryoniae. In the second test, watermelon progenies 1a, 5a, 1b and 2b, and the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres' showed a level of grafting success of 100%, while results with progenies 2a and 5b, and 'Gherkin' were different in grafting success, respectively 91.67, 98.33 and 43.33%. For other fruit parameters, weight, longitudinal and transverse diameters, pulp thickness and level of total soluble solids, there were no differences among the treatments.
id UNSP_4db843fad1761a7191a8c8241ce2aff6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70777
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivationCucumis meloDidymella bryoniaeProductionRootstockCitrullus lanatus var. lanatusCucumisCucumis anguriaCucurbitaFungiTwo tests were performed. In the first, resistance to Didymella bryoniae was determined for the following genotypes: the pumpkins 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki' and 'Shelper', watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 3a, 5a, 1b, 2b, 3b and 5b, and 'Gherkin' (C. anguria). The plants were inoculated with the fungus during transplanting. The evaluations of the test were performed every 15 d according to a scoring scale adopted by Dusi et al. (1994). The second test examined compatibility among the rootstocks x grafts, and their effects on production. The rootstocks, 5 pumpkins including 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', six watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, and one 'Gherkin', were planted one week before planting of the grafted 'Bônus No. 2' melon. The experiments were carried out with 12 treatments, including the control ('Bônus No. 2') with 3 replications with 14 grafted plants per each replication. For the first test, the first three evaluations (at 15, 30 and 45 d after inoculation) did not show characteristic lesions of stem canker, but progeny 3b was found to be susceptible in evaluations performed at 60 and 75 d after inoculation. Progeny 3a demonstrated intermediate susceptibility, while progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres', and 'Gherkin', showed resistance to Didymella bryoniae. In the second test, watermelon progenies 1a, 5a, 1b and 2b, and the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres' showed a level of grafting success of 100%, while results with progenies 2a and 5b, and 'Gherkin' were different in grafting success, respectively 91.67, 98.33 and 43.33%. For other fruit parameters, weight, longitudinal and transverse diameters, pulp thickness and level of total soluble solids, there were no differences among the treatments.Departamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal-São Paulo StateDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal-São Paulo StateUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ito, L. A. [UNESP]Braz, L. T. [UNESP]Castoldi, R. [UNESP]Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:23:46Z2014-05-27T11:23:46Z2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject151-155http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_22.htmActa Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 151-155.0567-7572http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70777WOS:0002613311000222-s2.0-58149141394Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengActa Horticulturae0,198info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T21:41:36Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/70777Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462021-10-23T21:41:36Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
title Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
spellingShingle Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstock
Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Fungi
title_short Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
title_full Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
title_fullStr Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
title_full_unstemmed Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
title_sort Response of rootstocks to stem canker and the production and quality of melon under protected cultivation
author Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
author_facet Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ito, L. A. [UNESP]
Braz, L. T. [UNESP]
Castoldi, R. [UNESP]
Charlo, H. C O [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstock
Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Fungi
topic Cucumis melo
Didymella bryoniae
Production
Rootstock
Citrullus lanatus var. lanatus
Cucumis
Cucumis anguria
Cucurbita
Fungi
description Two tests were performed. In the first, resistance to Didymella bryoniae was determined for the following genotypes: the pumpkins 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki' and 'Shelper', watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 3a, 5a, 1b, 2b, 3b and 5b, and 'Gherkin' (C. anguria). The plants were inoculated with the fungus during transplanting. The evaluations of the test were performed every 15 d according to a scoring scale adopted by Dusi et al. (1994). The second test examined compatibility among the rootstocks x grafts, and their effects on production. The rootstocks, 5 pumpkins including 'Ikky', 'Agroceres', 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', six watermelon progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, and one 'Gherkin', were planted one week before planting of the grafted 'Bônus No. 2' melon. The experiments were carried out with 12 treatments, including the control ('Bônus No. 2') with 3 replications with 14 grafted plants per each replication. For the first test, the first three evaluations (at 15, 30 and 45 d after inoculation) did not show characteristic lesions of stem canker, but progeny 3b was found to be susceptible in evaluations performed at 60 and 75 d after inoculation. Progeny 3a demonstrated intermediate susceptibility, while progenies 1a, 2a, 5a, 1b, 2b and 5b, the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres', and 'Gherkin', showed resistance to Didymella bryoniae. In the second test, watermelon progenies 1a, 5a, 1b and 2b, and the pumpkins 'Kirameki', 'Shelper', 'Ikky' and 'Agroceres' showed a level of grafting success of 100%, while results with progenies 2a and 5b, and 'Gherkin' were different in grafting success, respectively 91.67, 98.33 and 43.33%. For other fruit parameters, weight, longitudinal and transverse diameters, pulp thickness and level of total soluble solids, there were no differences among the treatments.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
2014-05-27T11:23:46Z
2014-05-27T11:23:46Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_22.htm
Acta Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 151-155.
0567-7572
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70777
WOS:000261331100022
2-s2.0-58149141394
url http://www.actahort.org/books/771/771_22.htm
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/70777
identifier_str_mv Acta Horticulturae, v. 771, p. 151-155.
0567-7572
WOS:000261331100022
2-s2.0-58149141394
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Horticulturae
0,198
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 151-155
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1792961635364634624