Welding strength of NiTi wires

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Martins, Lídia Parsekian, Martins, Renato Parsekian
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227
Resumo: ABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires.
id UNSP_571eea20bed31b5767f0a9c072201f6a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158227
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Welding strength of NiTi wiresWeldingOrthodontic wireTensile strengthSoldaFio ortodônticoResistência à rupturaABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires.RESUMOObjetivo:identificar a potência mais adequada para solda elétrica em três marcas comerciais de fios de níquel-titânio (NiTi).Métodos: noventa pares de fios ortodônticos de NiTi, de dimensões 0,018” e 0,017” × 0,025’’, foram soldados por resistência elétrica e distribuídos em três grupos: GI (Orthometric, Marília, São Paulo, Brasil), GII (3M, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brasil) e GIII (GAC, Yorque, Pensilvânia, Estados Unidos). Cada grupo foi dividido em subgrupos de cinco pares de fios soldados com diferentes níveis de potência. Nos GI e GII, os fios foram soldados com níveis de potência de 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 e 5; enquanto no GIII as potências utilizadas foram de 2.5, 3, 3.5 e 4. Os pares de fios foram submetidos a um teste de tração até sua ruptura, com registro das forças máximas. Análises de variância (ANOVA) e testes post-hoc foram realizados para determinar qual subgrupo, dentro de cada grupo, obteve a maior força de resistência.Resultados: a potência 2.5 exibiu a menor resistência à ruptura para todos os grupos (43,75 N para o GI; 28,41 N para o GII e 47,57 N para o GIII). A potência 4 mostrou maior resistência à ruptura nos GI e GII (97,90 N e 99,61 N, respectivamente), enquanto no GIII (79,28 N) foi a potência 3.5.Conclusões: os níveis de potência mais adequados variaram para as marcas comerciais, sendo identificados como 4 para Orthometric e 3M, e 3.5 para GAC.Universidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Clínica InfantilUniversidade Estadual Paulista Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara Departamento de Clínica InfantilDental Press InternationalUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Mesquita, Tatyane RibeiroMartins, Lídia ParsekianMartins, Renato Parsekian2018-11-12T17:28:55Z2018-11-12T17:28:55Z2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article58-62application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oarDental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018.2176-9451http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15822710.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oarS2176-94512018000310008S2176-94512018000310008.pdf8223795731605246SciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengDental Press Journal of Orthodontics0,489info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-20T06:31:35Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/158227Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-01-20T06:31:35Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Welding strength of NiTi wires
title Welding strength of NiTi wires
spellingShingle Welding strength of NiTi wires
Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro
Welding
Orthodontic wire
Tensile strength
Solda
Fio ortodôntico
Resistência à ruptura
title_short Welding strength of NiTi wires
title_full Welding strength of NiTi wires
title_fullStr Welding strength of NiTi wires
title_full_unstemmed Welding strength of NiTi wires
title_sort Welding strength of NiTi wires
author Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro
author_facet Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro
Martins, Lídia Parsekian
Martins, Renato Parsekian
author_role author
author2 Martins, Lídia Parsekian
Martins, Renato Parsekian
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mesquita, Tatyane Ribeiro
Martins, Lídia Parsekian
Martins, Renato Parsekian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Welding
Orthodontic wire
Tensile strength
Solda
Fio ortodôntico
Resistência à ruptura
topic Welding
Orthodontic wire
Tensile strength
Solda
Fio ortodôntico
Resistência à ruptura
description ABSTRACTObjective:To identify the appropriate power level for electric welding of three commercial brands of nickel-titanium (NiTi) wires.Methods: Ninety pairs of 0.018-in and 0.017 × 0.025-in NiTi wires were divided into three groups according to their manufacturers - GI (Orthometric, Marília, Brazil), GII (3M OralCare, St. Paul, CA) and GIII (GAC,York, PA) - and welded by electrical resistance. Each group was divided into subgroups of 5 pairs of wires, in which welding was done with different power levels. In GI and GII, power levels of 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5 and 5 were used, while in GIII 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 were used (each unit of power of the welding machine representing 500W). The pairs of welded wires underwent a tensile strength test on an universal testing machine until rupture and the maximum forces were recorded. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted to determine which subgroup within each brand group had the greatest resistance to rupture.Results: The 2.5 power exhibited the lowest resistance to rupture in all groups (43.75N for GI, 28.41N for GII and 47.57N for GIII) while the 4.0 power provided the highest resistance in GI and GII (97.90N and 99.61N, respectively), while in GIII (79.28N) the highest resistance was achieved with a 3.5 power welding.Conclusions: The most appropriate power for welding varied for each brand, being 4.0 for Orthometric and 3M, and 3.5 for GAC NiTi wires.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-12T17:28:55Z
2018-11-12T17:28:55Z
2018-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018.
2176-9451
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227
10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar
S2176-94512018000310008
S2176-94512018000310008.pdf
8223795731605246
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/158227
identifier_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press International, v. 23, n. 3, p. 58-62, 2018.
2176-9451
10.1590/2177-6709.22.3.058-062.oar
S2176-94512018000310008
S2176-94512018000310008.pdf
8223795731605246
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
0,489
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 58-62
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799965673795878912