Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simões, P. S. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carbonari, C. A. [UNESP], Nascentes, R. F. [UNESP], Stasievski, A. [UNESP], Velini, E. D. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169217
Resumo: For the successful execution of chemical weed control in sugarcane crop, the selectivity of herbicides is a factor of great importance to maximize crop yield. Each cultivar may respond differently to the same herbicide in the same dose, and selectivity is not only determined by the visual presence or absence of phytotoxicity. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of herbicides amicarbazone, tebuthiuron, and diuron + hexazinona on the electron transport rate in photosystem II (ETR), along with the development and yield of sugarcane cultivars RB867515, CTC 4, CTC 9, and CTC 17 in greenhouse, and field conditions. Under greenhouse conditions ETR was assessed by a portable fluorometer, aa well as dry weight and phytotoxicity of the plants. In field evaluations, ETR, number of stems, yield and technological characteristics were assessed. In the greenhouse, the tebuthiuron herbicide caused the lowest reduction levels of ETR, phytotoxicity and dry weight of different sugarcane cultivars, followed by amicarbazone, and diuron + hexazinona. The effects of herbicides in ETR and phytotoxicity were more intense in greenhouse conditions than in field conditions for all cultivars. Herbicides tebuthiuron, amicarbazone and diuron + hexazinoa were selective for all evaluated cultivars, and reductions in the ETR after herbicide application did not affect the yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.
id UNSP_60e15535b7f9bc027e331d3086971011
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169217
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcarSelectivity of herbicides inhibitors of photosystem II for sugarcane cultivarsAmicarbazoneDiuronElectron transport rateHexazinonaSaccharum sppTebuthiuronFor the successful execution of chemical weed control in sugarcane crop, the selectivity of herbicides is a factor of great importance to maximize crop yield. Each cultivar may respond differently to the same herbicide in the same dose, and selectivity is not only determined by the visual presence or absence of phytotoxicity. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of herbicides amicarbazone, tebuthiuron, and diuron + hexazinona on the electron transport rate in photosystem II (ETR), along with the development and yield of sugarcane cultivars RB867515, CTC 4, CTC 9, and CTC 17 in greenhouse, and field conditions. Under greenhouse conditions ETR was assessed by a portable fluorometer, aa well as dry weight and phytotoxicity of the plants. In field evaluations, ETR, number of stems, yield and technological characteristics were assessed. In the greenhouse, the tebuthiuron herbicide caused the lowest reduction levels of ETR, phytotoxicity and dry weight of different sugarcane cultivars, followed by amicarbazone, and diuron + hexazinona. The effects of herbicides in ETR and phytotoxicity were more intense in greenhouse conditions than in field conditions for all cultivars. Herbicides tebuthiuron, amicarbazone and diuron + hexazinoa were selective for all evaluated cultivars, and reductions in the ETR after herbicide application did not affect the yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’ (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Simões, P. S. [UNESP]Carbonari, C. A. [UNESP]Nascentes, R. F. [UNESP]Stasievski, A. [UNESP]Velini, E. D. [UNESP]2018-12-11T16:44:57Z2018-12-11T16:44:57Z2016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article803-814application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021Planta Daninha, v. 34, n. 4, p. 803-814, 2016.0100-8358http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16921710.1590/S0100-83582016340400021S0100-835820160004008032-s2.0-85005943511S0100-83582016000400803.pdf98554934481617020000-0003-0431-5942Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPlanta Daninha0,365info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-15T06:14:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/169217Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462023-11-15T06:14:55Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
Selectivity of herbicides inhibitors of photosystem II for sugarcane cultivars
title Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
spellingShingle Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
Simões, P. S. [UNESP]
Amicarbazone
Diuron
Electron transport rate
Hexazinona
Saccharum spp
Tebuthiuron
title_short Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
title_full Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
title_fullStr Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
title_full_unstemmed Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
title_sort Seletividade de herbicidas inibidores do fotossistema II para cultivares de cana-de-açúcar
author Simões, P. S. [UNESP]
author_facet Simões, P. S. [UNESP]
Carbonari, C. A. [UNESP]
Nascentes, R. F. [UNESP]
Stasievski, A. [UNESP]
Velini, E. D. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Carbonari, C. A. [UNESP]
Nascentes, R. F. [UNESP]
Stasievski, A. [UNESP]
Velini, E. D. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simões, P. S. [UNESP]
Carbonari, C. A. [UNESP]
Nascentes, R. F. [UNESP]
Stasievski, A. [UNESP]
Velini, E. D. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Amicarbazone
Diuron
Electron transport rate
Hexazinona
Saccharum spp
Tebuthiuron
topic Amicarbazone
Diuron
Electron transport rate
Hexazinona
Saccharum spp
Tebuthiuron
description For the successful execution of chemical weed control in sugarcane crop, the selectivity of herbicides is a factor of great importance to maximize crop yield. Each cultivar may respond differently to the same herbicide in the same dose, and selectivity is not only determined by the visual presence or absence of phytotoxicity. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of herbicides amicarbazone, tebuthiuron, and diuron + hexazinona on the electron transport rate in photosystem II (ETR), along with the development and yield of sugarcane cultivars RB867515, CTC 4, CTC 9, and CTC 17 in greenhouse, and field conditions. Under greenhouse conditions ETR was assessed by a portable fluorometer, aa well as dry weight and phytotoxicity of the plants. In field evaluations, ETR, number of stems, yield and technological characteristics were assessed. In the greenhouse, the tebuthiuron herbicide caused the lowest reduction levels of ETR, phytotoxicity and dry weight of different sugarcane cultivars, followed by amicarbazone, and diuron + hexazinona. The effects of herbicides in ETR and phytotoxicity were more intense in greenhouse conditions than in field conditions for all cultivars. Herbicides tebuthiuron, amicarbazone and diuron + hexazinoa were selective for all evaluated cultivars, and reductions in the ETR after herbicide application did not affect the yield and technological characteristics of sugarcane cultivars.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-01
2018-12-11T16:44:57Z
2018-12-11T16:44:57Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021
Planta Daninha, v. 34, n. 4, p. 803-814, 2016.
0100-8358
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169217
10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021
S0100-83582016000400803
2-s2.0-85005943511
S0100-83582016000400803.pdf
9855493448161702
0000-0003-0431-5942
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/169217
identifier_str_mv Planta Daninha, v. 34, n. 4, p. 803-814, 2016.
0100-8358
10.1590/S0100-83582016340400021
S0100-83582016000400803
2-s2.0-85005943511
S0100-83582016000400803.pdf
9855493448161702
0000-0003-0431-5942
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha
0,365
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 803-814
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799964945171873792